The pictures look fake, and the rocks are all too much like earth rocks--so similar, in fact, that NASA and the geological community have been arguing for decades as to what is or is not a moon rock:

[link to en.wikipedia.org]
---
From the 1950s through the 1990s, NASA aerodynamicist Dean R. Chapman and others advanced the "lunar origin" theory of tektites.
...
O'Keefe [of NASA] suggested explosive, hydrogen-driven lunar volcanoes as the original source of tektites.
...
Regardless, O'Keefe said that "If 14425 was found in Antarctica instead of Fra Mauro (on the Moon), it would probably have been accepted as a tektite."
---

In other words, "moon rocks" look a lot like the product of hydrogen bomb explosions. Of course, only the military-industrial-intelligence complex has access to hydrogen bomb explosions, so the geological community has no way to compare the products of such explosions against the "moon rocks."