Sorcha Faal is Booth´s Daughter Rachal..

While you´re at it, you should also expose Emperor Kent there as well!

How is the Emperor like Sorcha? He goes by no other disguise, like Superego, that we´re aware of.

Sure he does, by ac alter-egos.

<>

Every GLP poster has at one time or another utilized the AC device.

But his name is Kent Steadman isn´t it?

Superego, perhaps you should provide yours to give your own self some credibility.

As far as that is concerned, perhaps you should do the same. At least I´m registered.

Let stick to Sorcha... I mean Rachal.... Kent´s no threat to anyone in anyway that I can see.... but the Sorcha thing has been going on for some time now... and it´s nothing more than Rachal´s latest construct.... Speak up Rachel!! We know you lurk and read here.... You´re hooked and you can´t let go.... hence the Sorcha crap.... Speak up woman, you have in the past here...

Yes, and because you´e registered you should set the example so others can follow.

super egos are at the root of just about every problem in this troubled world......

egos are a product of the psuedo creation,superegos the archons of the dark side.

I presume the Booth family are Jewish. Not a healthy thing in a conspiracy world.

But where is substantial evidence that Sorcha is Rachel?

Ok, ok, ok. I agree. It´s no big deal. Kent is harmless, I know. The real issue and danger is Sorcha, which I myself have been saying for sometime now, albeit, in other venues, under a different guise!

Why is Sorcha a danger? Does she tell the truth?

No, b/c she´s a fraud.

AC ID:1132..... believe me dude, anyone that has followed the Booth thing, and was here, as I was, for the Rachal postings etc... will immediately put this one together.... once pointed out, as I have just done, it just jumps right out at you...

Sorcha Faal
__rcha___al
__rachal___
sofa = remaining letters
fosa
foas
faos
asof.... I dunno, but her last name is not Booth and I don´t recall what is was, but you have fun sorting out the last 4 letters...

N.E.L.E. going to bed and checking in tomorrow...

<>


You seem to be hanging labels on people without evidences. Not good form!!

Why is she a danger?

How is it she is a fraud?

Apart from a play on words, what other evidences exist that Sorcha is Rachel?

AC:1132... the first thing you need to get clear is that her name is ´Rachal´ not Rachel.... note the spelling... someone help me out here would ya... I know there has got to be at least one ´original´ poster from ´back in the good ´ol days´ reading this...

<<´Rachal´ not Rachel>>

It´s irrelevant. Rob or Bob? Billy or Willy?

It´s relevant to the word play.

<>

Okay...then let´s do a word play on superego.

If you want to, be my guest. Kind of shame to waste the time though, since Superego already has independent meaning unto itself, and only by luck would it have scrambled relevance to me!

The real issue and danger is Sorcha,

The real danger is when people believe anything and everything on the net.

<>

People have been believing anything and everything for centuries, long before the internet. Santa Claus and Easter Bunny are two instances.

How has that been dangerous?

Ok then, let´s replace Santa with Sorcha. I´m sure the kids will love it.

"Ok then, let´s replace Santa with Sorcha."

So explain to us how Santa is dangerous?

I never said he was. You were the first to make the comparison. I merely pointed that out.

apples and lemons.

apples and lemons.


Okay, so tell us about the dangers of hanging labels on people?

1099: remember Hitler?

Labeling can be quite dangerous. No doubt about that. But sometimes it´s necessary.

Your honesty is unusually refreshing, but your attitude is scary.

Thank you in part.

<>

Good form.

I presume you allude to the latter, part B.

And thank you.