Notes from an "alternate universe". Introduction to a new way of thinking.

The "social 9/11"

But much bigger.

They Live.

It's kind of funny that some people think "Q" is Donald John Titor Trump (or his son)

Like the "Q" in In-Q-Tel, they're just some white hat "analysts" at a particular agency. Good guys who pull out the Mickey Mouse now and then.

Plausible deniability is great for real-life, physical situations.

But what do you need on the internet?

Mickey Mouse.

1. Interesting to hear JT referenced in this context. I was aware of the B. Trump theories, but didn't give them much thought at the time.

John Titor's stuff, on the other hand, is right up there with ecsys for hours spent in research-mode. Funny how I was so focused on finding archived material that I missed the present day connections.

2. When you refer to Mickey, what context is he in? And how would you describe the image in your mind? What characteristics are most Mickey-ish?

For those who don’t know this reference:
[link to en.m.wikipedia.org (secure)]

I can go with the idea of They Live except radio signals seems a little archaic for what's available for transmissions. How about it's just our subconscious speaking to us?

"...who discovers that the ruling class are [_______] concealing their appearance and manipulating people to spend money, breed, and accept the status quo with subliminal messages in mass media."

...in order to enslave others without their knowing. A "chaotic order".

Not aliens, per se, but they are humans that believe they are descended from aliens (Sirians, as noted on the other thread). They believe they are special, and have an inalienable right to rule over all life on Earth.

How is no one quoting this nonsense? This is not even new-age talk, this is pure neo-advaita religious gibberish. How this troll even says this is "scientific fact"??? This is a trolling act or what?

The sun is not a "self" and it's not another "you". The sun is the sun and you do actually perceive it how it is, otherwise you perceive what? Even if you didn't perceive it entirely how it is (indirect realism) the sun would still not be another yourself, this is made up religious advaita-talk added by him. Pure nonsense.

Those who claim that personal awareness and individual consciousness are illusions do not know what they are talking about.



Last Edited by demantix on 08/09/2018 05:46 PM

I disagree.
Each person creates his or her own sun in their mind.

You perceive a limited scope of colors within 3 dimensions, via your eyes. That input gets translated in your brain. It is nowhere near a subjective unchanging sun we perceive. And we cannot even “see” all of it.

That statement was about not being able to perceive the Sun directly (for what it is). When you perceive the Sun you are interpreting signals, not perceiving directly.

That is, indeed, scientific fact. It's how the senses work.

But welcome back. If you really thought it was religious alphabeta talk, I suppose you wouldn't continue to visit.

By the way, I'm sure you know this already but you edited my quote to suit your own argument. That's too funny!

Real quote: "When you're perceiving the Sun, for example, you're actually perceiving yourself, not how the Sun actually is. "

You quoted: "When you're perceiving the Sun, for example, you're actually perceiving another yourself"

Let's do it again :) That was fun!

Yo Kore!

When is the next nexus? Anything of 'note' coming up?

Whenever you want it to be, actually.

Just pick a date and relate things with it. Same as all ways.

We don't sense, we interpret :)

How about September 9th?



Sure. What do you want to come up?

Gonna help me interpret my way to that Bronze Chest with gold nuggets and a dragon coat bracelet?!?

Sure, but could you begin by restating that in a way that makes sense from your current reality?

Let's make it logical to your perspective :)

I need to adjust my interactions with maps in order to analyze an important possibility that allows me to solve Fenn's 9 clues in order, by putting an X on a map, but be confident enough in my solve, to retrieve it immediately.

Nothing about it will be accidental. It is our fate to find the chest. But how can I make its discovery more logical to my current perspective?

Fenn does have this to say:
"It seems logical to me that a deep thinking treasure searcher could use logic to determine an important clue to the location of the treasure. Is someone doing that now and I don’t know it? It’s not what they say on the blogs that may be significant, it’s what they whisper.”"

Make it logical for the answer to be in the clue.

For example, you could interpret "It’s not what they say on the blogs that may be significant, it’s what they whisper." to be something that is not taken seriously on the blogs.

Then your job would be to read 'the blogs' to find out what is talked about but not taken seriously.

You create reality as you go along (because you are interpreting it anew)

I've put up the old Ecsys website on the new website, here: [link to www.qmetaphysics.com]

Indeed, one had figured out such things. Whenever, where ever, always coming up.


September 9th works for me.

Sense vs Interpret, roger that. That makes 'sense'

Let me get back to you.

Last Edited by LKing on 08/30/2018 09:39 AM

Greatness.

So i had a little think.


What I thought of is this, to devise an event where everyone who decides to take part meets up together inside Chaols library and they remember the experience and share their version of that memory with the 'Kore' group.

Fuck lurkers and stragglers.

Well, it worked for me.

I have heard from 1 other who it worked for also.

Did anything interesting happen on September 9?

Yes, it works. But it works best not when there is focus, but 'unfocus'

When we focus on something that we 'want' to happen, the focus satisfies the reality.

WHen we make it so that we have no choice by to experience it, then it is much more likely to happen because it has not yet been satisfied.

What do you mean it works but it works best??

What would be different when there is not focus but unfocus?

Yes, and why now?

"Reality = False
All of it is "fake"
Truth is beyond perception.
Realizing this is the first step to manipulating it however you want.
The idea is to perceive less and find the patterns in the less that is perceived.
discover things where you are all ready."

I realize the dream world is an illusion with a reality check. The dream is exposed as an illusion and free will becomes activated.

The reality check is a reality bending technique that provides concrete proof the dream is an illusion.

My questions

Is there a reality check for the waking reality?

Can you have a reality realization to the same degree you can achieve in a dream? 

Even though I know dream reality is an illusion I am not aware of it 100% and manipulating it however I want. I must first have the concrete realization through a reality check which is plug nose with hand and breathing in.

What would make me have the “concrete” realization that reality is an illusion just as the dream world?