Godlike Productions - Discussion Forum
Users Online Now: 2,064 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 545,387
Pageviews Today: 1,252,045Threads Today: 832Posts Today: 14,004
04:10 PM

Back to Forum
Back to Forum
Back to Thread
Back to Thread
Message Subject Clear concrete proof that 'GOD' of Bible/Koran/Talmud is false.
Poster Handle Anonymous Coward
Post Content
This entity Apollonius of Tyana is the central figure of a certain religious order that was prevalent at that time in Rome and his life was incorporated into the Holy Roman religion or Catholic version of the Christian epic which became the official Roman religion in approximately 300 AD.

There was also energies of several other spiritual leaders of Roman religious sects whose stories were also brought in and there were those spiritual personalities or deities from other Roman religious orders whose histories or religious myths came from other cultures

Krishna for example, of India, was one of the religious cults and groups in Rome, and his story was merged with that of Apollonius of Tyana. The story of Krishna as that entity who came into the earth born of a virgin and who attempted to save people from error and sin, but who was hanged for his efforts

this was incorporated in the story of Jesus and the Apollonius story was also part of this story, and there were also entities whose religion was that of sun worshipping, wherein there was the sun and the 12 houses or signs, and these sun worshippers had their story of Jesus in which the sun god had 12 disciples and these 12 disciples of course reflected the 12 signs of those who were the sun worshippers in Rome. This was of course an astrological religion.

the combination of the many different Roman religious orders or organizations, the different religious sects, forming a composite in which the central heroic character was the Son of God, having 12 disciples, being born of a virgin, whose intent and purpose was to help save mankind, and for his efforts, the entity was slain and put upon a cross; the entity also having certain miraculous powers, including that of those who can heal by touch, or raise from the dead or move into states of suspended animation, such as some of the masters of India have demonstrated in various times throughout history.

Thus, one aspect of this composite known as Jesus moved west to India, and into Kashmir, and was recorded as having been the entity known as Jesus, and lived there to a ripe age. Another aspect of this composite moved eastward along with the Holy Family, and bore a child through Mary Magdalene

this was known as the Holy Family, which the Catholic Church made every effort to eradicate and destroy and remove any trace of the information surrounding that entity, but which the Templars made every effort to preserve and to promote and carry on that Holy Bloodline, even to the point of some hundred years later, taking the Holy Family, the descendants of the Holy Family into the New World, through Newfoundland and into what was later to be called the United States

the entity that contributed to the composite known as Jesus went westward, while another entity who contributed to the composite known as Jesus went eastward.
there were of course, still others.
Attempting to discuss the story of Jesus in a traditional way opens a Pandora's Box of discrepancies, when you approach or seek the truth of the matter, because the Jesus of the Bible, being a composite of many different entities, or several different entities, is not the true story


Christianity nearly dominated the entire world for 300 years long before Rome was ever invented, so to try to begin all Christian history at 325 AD is just pure deception. Go back and take a course in Church History. Not all Christians followed Rome, and neither do they now.

Pagans were infiltrating the early Church and even though it took over 300 years to do it, they finally suceeded in taking over Rome. However, all of Christianity does not lay in Rome, and never will. Time to stop deceiving people with long winded lies.
 Quoting: Wingedlion

But what was called Christianity then bears no resemblence to what after the Church was established and began to use the word. The Catholic Church took the word Christian and made it about a belief in Jesus instead of its original which was those who fought against the established order for more progressive ideas, for change. The ones the Church later called 'early Christians' were Nazarenes, Essenes, Pythagoreans, Buddhists, Krishnas, Those of 'The Way', & others all of whom at various times incurred the wrath of the Roman Emperors and were persecuted and martyred for their beliefs.
When the Roman Church was established, Jesus Christ was invented and the followers of the new religion became known as Christians, taking over the meaning of the name from what it had been before (but still implying progressive, new,change, etc.) If you've ever read or perused the Lives of the Saints, you'll notice that the stories of the Saints from prior to the Church's establishment are very vague in detail, since their beliefs really weren't about any man called Jesus. Whereas the ones after the Church's establishment very clearly state the beliefs they proclaimed and were martyred for and their lives are much more detailed. It's very interesting to see that.
Please verify you're human:

Reason for copyright violation: