Godlike Productions - Discussion Forum
Users Online Now: 2,030 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 1,714,708
Pageviews Today: 2,372,277Threads Today: 588Posts Today: 10,925
06:25 PM


Rate this Thread

Absolute BS Crap Reasonable Nice Amazing
 

Ancient skeletons discovered in Georgia could overturn theory of evolution

 
The Unknown
User ID: 758236
United States
09/10/2009 11:46 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Ancient skeletons discovered in Georgia could overturn theory of evolution
Idol1
For generations, scientists have believed Africa was the cradle of mankind.

Now a stunning archaeological discovery suggests our primitive ancestors left Africa to explore the world around 800,000 years earlier than was previously thought before returning to their home continent.

It was there - hundreds of thousands of years later - that they evolved into modern humans and embarked on a second mass migration, researchers say.

Archaeologists have unearthed six ancient skeletons dating back 1.8 million years in the hills of Georgia which threaten to overturn the theory of human evolution.

The Georgian bones - which include incredibly well preserved skulls and teeth - are the earliest humans ever found outside Africa.

The remains belong to a race of short early humans with small primitive brains who walked and ran like modern people.

They were found alongside stone tools, animal remains and plants - suggesting that they hunted and butchered meat.

Prof David Lordkipanidze, the direct of the Georgian National Museum, said: 'Before our findings, the prevailing view was that humans came out of Africa almost 1million years ago, that they already had sophisticated stone tools, and that their body anatomy was quite advanced in terms of brain capacity and limb proportions. But what we are finding is quite different'

He said Africa was still the unchallenged cradle of mankind. But he added: 'Georgia may have been the cradle of the first Europeans.'

Their discovery muddies the already complicated history of mankind.

Archaeologists believe that the first true humans - a race of squat people called Homo habilis - evolved in Africa around 2.5 million years ago. The were followed by a taller athletic species called Homo erectus who migrated out of Africa to colonise Europe and Asia.

Outside Africa their descendents are thought to have died out. But in Africa, they turned into modern man who began a second wave of migration around 120,000 years ago.

The new finds suggest Homo erectus left Africa far earlier than was previously estimated and lived for a while in Eurasia.

The new ancestors - found in Dmanisi - were around 150cm tall, and had brains half the size of modern people's.

'While the Dmanisi people were almost modern in their body proportions, and were highly efficient walkers and runners, their arms moved in a different way and their brains were tiny compared to ours,' he told the British Science Festival at Surrey University.

'Their brain capacity is about 600 cubic centimetres. The prevailing view before this discovery was that the humans who first left Africa had a brain size of about 1,000 cubic centimetres.

'Nevertheless they were sophisticated tool makers with high social and cognitive skills.'

The first Dmanisi fossils were found in 2001. The most recent has only just been unearthed and its details have yet to be published in a scientific journal.

Prof Lordkipanidze said the Dmanisi bones may have belonged to an early Homo erectus which lived in Georgia before moving on to the rest of Europe.

Or the early humans may then have returned to Africa, eventually giving rise to our own species, Homoe sapiens, he said.

'The question is whether Homo erectus orginated in Africa or Eurasia, and if in Eurasia, did we have vice-versa migrations? This idea looked very stupid

________________________________________________________

These findings does not differ from biblical text.
It never did.

I know we are looking for earlier Europeans(humans with no melanin). Anciant africans became European later after their migration from Africa. Due too harsh condition they mutated into other races. There is nothing wrong with that.

Base on the Bible Adam and Eve are still Ethiopic figures base on the Biblical location and descriptions.

Whether we found skeletons in Africa, Europe etc Ancient man will be still characterize as blacks African, coons, N...o, N...ers, C...orls, Aliens & Gods etc...

We must accept where we came from.

Adamah(meanns reddish brown earth in Hebrew) hence it was a decription on how the anciant man look like. They Looked dark brown like the Africans.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 767973
United States
09/10/2009 11:51 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Ancient skeletons discovered in Georgia could overturn theory of evolution
When they get to the top of Truth Mountain they'll find the Bible.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 767301
United States
09/11/2009 03:52 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Ancient skeletons discovered in Georgia could overturn theory of evolution
But humans are only about 6,000 years old (since Creation), right? Isn't that what we've been taught all along? So is the OP trying to bend that tradition to fit something that's completely foreign? Or could it be that the Bible was written by MAN to fit MAN'S agenda? Naw, say it isn't so. LOL!
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 728812
United Kingdom
09/11/2009 04:00 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Ancient skeletons discovered in Georgia could overturn theory of evolution
interesting
The Unknown (OP)
User ID: 758236
United States
09/12/2009 01:06 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Ancient skeletons discovered in Georgia could overturn theory of evolution
But humans are only about 6,000 years old (since Creation), right? Isn't that what we've been taught all along? So is the OP trying to bend that tradition to fit something that's completely foreign? Or could it be that the Bible was written by MAN to fit MAN'S agenda? Naw, say it isn't so. LOL!
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 767301

Idol1

While most of the stories of the Bible have their historical
place, they do not represent the absolute beginning.
Yes, historians and explorer have unearth many biblical places which are remarkably beautiful.However the time of creation is man bad interpretation of infinity and relativity.

There is a section in the Bible where the author is trying to explain infinity and relativity. This concept does make sense. If GOD is infinite and omnipotent therefore 1 minutes for what is infinite(GOD) would be equal to so many years to what is finite(man)

In the bible,It is written that a day in paradise is equal to 1000 years. However since ancient did not understand the concept of 0 and decimal places, this number is inacurate.
The concept of zero was denoted in India in 1700BC but was accepted in the 7th century AD.
There is no reference to years of creation. Hence the biggest mistake is to say that 1 day of creation is 1000 years therefore God created man in 6000 years+ The 6000 years is our interpretation of time not actual.

Mankind invented zero to measure his level of conciousness in an Infinite Universe(GOD).
This means that there is no starting point for the universe.
The universe is infinite. There is no big bang.Logically if a huge piece of matter exploded to create the Universe then what place the matter there. The question never ends.Just like 1 divided by close to 0 is = infinity. God is infinity and we can't measure it.





GLP