My feeling is, that the safest place to be is under water. Perhaps deep in the ocean. Perhaps with biodomes built down there, away from the average prying eyes...so secretive, that no one without cosmic clearance is able to go there...

Perhaps underwater cities are being built. Haven't we always heard of space craft coming out of the water?

It's just a feeling I have. Imagine what "they" aren't telling us. Denver Airport paints a picture of what that holocaust for humanity might look like. Perhaps they are building high tech bio domes under the ocean, where it would be safer from the affects of nuclear fallout and other possible biological and chemical warfare, on the surface.

Thots?
------------------------------------------------------
A nuke-powered sub

Any underwater place will not be a safe haven. Subs and biodomes are high technology devices which require resupply, from technologically advanced sources. The safest place will be a large land mass that is not close to a targeted area and is sparsely populated by a people that are used to living with no technology and at a low subsistence level. A place where one can hunt and farm food. It would need to have mountain areas that rise far above sea level. There are a few such places. The center of Borneo is one and Papua New Guinea is another. The region if Irian Jaya is less desirable because the population includes highly fanatical religious zealots.


-------------------------------------------------------

But, considering the nuclear arsenal that we possess here on earth, we can blow earth to kingdom come...and no where will be safe from radiation.

Ever seen "Threads"? Fascinating movie about this subject...a nuke goes off and it even shows what the affects of radiation has on the planet

VERY disturbing movie

Threads (1984)

"Documentary style account of a nuclear holocaust and it's affect on the working class city of Sheffield, England; and the eventual long run affects of nuclear war on civilization."



[link to www.moviesfoundonline.com]


.
.
.


While humans may have a significant arsenal, they are not aimed at random places. There is a specific protocol for using all military weapons and the nuclear weapons that are carried on missiles are aimed at very specific targets. If bombs are dropped from planes, the planes are in general flying specific missions with the intent of destroying specific targets. There is no reason to bombard certain insignificant places. Every thing has a probability, including survival. What you want to do is identify those places that have the statistically highest probability of survival. The majority of targets for nuclear weapons are in the northern hemisphere. There is no reason to target anything near the places I have mentioned. It is true there will be a small amount of radioactive particles that will fall on just about anywhere on earth, but most of it will be in the upper atmosphere circling Europe, Canada, Russia and the US for long enough that the half life will have rendered it essentially harmless by the time it falls into the seas and sea currents carry it to these places. Also being inland away from the seas will minimize exposure to sea borne pollutants.