True medical state of Stephen Hawking

Before reading this thread, it can be useful if you have a quick look in the thread "Stephen Hawking is a fraud", skipping straight down to page 3 thereof to see my posting there MLM User ID 794093. Little response there so far, perhaps because the earlier postings in that thread are partly insulting, so few people read down to there. My posting there is serious.
We must distinguish clearly betweenb Einstein and Hawking. Einstein was an honest man who said himelf that something is lacking in his relativity theory, but he did not find it until the end of his life, and until then he was in good health ensuring clarity of mind. In sharp contrast, Hawking suffers from a progressive disease which destroys brain cells responsible for controlling the muscles of the body (motor neurons) and is still alive 40 years after the diagnosis, whereas the average life expectancy in such a situation is only a few years; cases longer than ten years are very rare. Motor neuron decay is often cited together with other progressive diseases involvig brain cell decay, in particular the Alzheimer disease, which goes hand in hand with irreversible destruction of clarity of mind. I still need to know of an authentic medical publication proving that the motor neuron disease is so specific as regards what kind of brain cells it destroys, that full clarity of mind to the extent of great thinking for the progress of science is possble - especially after forty years of it, when the life expectancy is well under ten years. Maybe it is so specific; I would be interested to read such a medical case analysis. Lacking that, it is not unreasonable to ask whether there is something strange about the "Hawking culture". Let us stay polite and not call it "fraud" right at the outset, unless we find proof that fraud is involved, and if so, with what motivation. I am a trained physicist competent to speak the candid truth about what we know of the origin and workings of the universe to the present day, so please let me clarify the situation on that issue before continuing with some medical conjecture. I am not a trained medical doctor, so less competent to say anything in that field.
It is improper to accusee Hawking of incompetence because he is following the Einstein paradigm of relativity. He must follow that paradigm, because relativity theory is basically true, and all attempts made to debunk Einstein originate from amateur thinking and not from well-informed physicists. Hoever, it is true that in detail Einstein's relativity theory urgently needs some profound revision in the light of astrophysical observations made since his death. That's the answer to Einstein's own realisation, that there were still missing links until his death. By the way, it is also impertinently insulting to Einstein to accuse him of what the start of the thread "Stephen Hawking is a fraud" asserts. Of course there were some precursor ideas on which Einstein built, but his great mathematical formalism was his work and not stolen from elsewhere. Regarding Hawking, I can only say with confidence after 28 years of intensive work on cosmology, that his chief contributions, namely the birth of the Universe allegedly in a huge explosion (big bang) at the moment of birth, and disintegration of the universe into black holes cut off from the remainder of the universe, are physical nonsense in the sense that nothing such whatsoever happened or exists.
This is no reason, however, to insult Hawking by alleging that he has no common sense. His book "A brief history of time from the big bang to black holes" it very well written in the literary sense, also especially in the historical scientific sense, and it is quite witty and well constructed with common sense. However, and I state this my opinion as a trained scientist, his ideas about the universe beyond Einstein are totally incorrect and blatently flout fundamental laws of physics which have never let us down. Scientists today are aware of this problem and the standard apology is that the laws of physics were being created too with the universe. I profoundly disagree with that and assert thet Stephen Hawking is scientifically wrong, in the sense that physical reality of the universe is not what he writes in his book and other publications.
It is up to Stephen Hawking and Cambridge University UK to prove the contrary, if they are sure that I am wrong. On the Internet site "Cambridge Cosmology" they list nine important questions as "Shortcomongs of the Standard Model" (the Hawking concept). I have the full answers to these and many other questions in an impressively consistent mutual agreement of the details without any exotic ideas or violation of known principles of physics. I am game for a scientific dialogue, but prerequisite is that Cambridge takes note of what I am saying instead of ignoring it.Please prove me wrong , if you can! The proper and lasting way to do this is to do it publicly. I am looking for a publisher willing to take my manuscript and publish it quickly, so that it is a public showdown between Hawking's book and mine. This is as good as certain to become a best seller. I say the following at the outset: My line after 28 years of intensive study is that we need to return to the opinions of the former parson on the chair at Cambridge UK which Hawking holds today, namely Paul Dirac together with the Astronomer Royal Sir Arthur Eddington. Their cosmology of continuous matter creation instead of all-of-a-sudden in a Big Bang moment of no duration at a point of no size, was "defeated" at the time in favour of the present Big Bang Black Holes because they required that matter creation would still be going on today, now at a furious rate which no astronomer sees directly or indirectly. Dirac-Eddington had no way to stop further matter creation when enough had appeared. My alternative to Hawking, essentially debunking him, is not just a warm-up of the former Dirac-Eddington dish. It brings the mechanism of stopping matter creation when enough had appeared, and numerous other important common-sense features gleaned from astrophysical observations of astronomers world wide to the present day. It thereby turns out that Einstein's special relatovity is 100 percent correct, but my results add some surprising new meaning. And Einstein's general relativity is unfortunately only an approximation, a good approximation, for conditions of mild gravity but unable to explain what happens under conditions of extreme gravity. Because there neverwas a big band at the moment of birth of the universe, nor are there any black holes in the universe, Hawkings "corollary" discoveries also fall flat. Sorry! There were explosions in the making of the universe, but not at the moment of birth.

Now regarding the medical side and conceivable possibilities that fraud might be involved, if not at the outset, possibly in the meantime for still supporting the "aurora of the Hawking paradigm" which in my opinion and that of an increasing number of other scientists too, is explaining nothing about the universe and holding up progress in this field. Regarding possible motivation, there is a lot of money in the mass media. Whatever, the scientific content is nonsense. My wife suffers from the Alzheimer syndrome since about 4 years and is now in an old age nursing home mixed with person ranging from a worse state of Alzheimer than hers, to almost normal, just old, people. The Alzheimer cases are all progressively losing clarity of mind. Alzheimer is a progressive disease of brain cell decay in which the affected kind of brain cells is diffuse, whereas in Hawking's disease allegedly only motor neuron cells, i.e. those controlling the muscles of the body, are destroyed. I need proof of such specificality in relevant medical publications to believe that this specific course of the disease does not affect clarity of mind.