The Moon is Hollow: NASA provides all the information to prove it.

I would think this thread would definitly attract some reponses on this forum, since I know many here are highly interested in this theory.

I guess now´s the time to have "Dave" try to acess the thread from New York.

Interesting indeed!

No repsonse, several "views">

Come on BABB fucktards~!

I knew you wouldnt let this thread actually appear in the forum to anyone but me.

Now I expect some disclaimers from posers, if the pattern holds out

OK...title="The Moon is Hollow..."

Article="The theoretic "inner core" has a radius of"


So is it hollow or what?


Websters definition of "hollow"

an unfilled space : CAVITY, HOLE

The moon was dragged here by ETs.

AC, Let me try to condense it down to a few sentences so you dont lose your train of though reading through several paragraphs.

NASA´s value for the overall density of the moon is 3.3 grams per cubic centemeter, and thats the same density approximately as the surface material.
Since NASA claims the moon gets denser toward the core as per thier siesmic experiments, a contradiction exists in the evidence.
If the planets overall density is approximately equal to it´s surface density and it gets denser toward the center, it has to be hollow (or hollowed out to some extent) to explain the overall density.

"The moon was dragged here by ETs."

I have developed a simple program to keep track of who is replying to my threads, and it´s a short list.

So now youre changing your profession from head shrinker to simple fucktard, huh psycho?

ahhh, thanks 9277


I see where your goin now

Absolutly hollow. It´s a Kontrol ship used in cojunction with the harmonic grid on earth

You don´t seem to understand satire, do you, Paranoid Dim Wit, as well as most of physics and astronomy?

There is an intelligent design to creation that the Phil Plaits of the world do not understand or even try to comprehend.
They are without souls, believeing in false savant prophets as gods.

Ice floats making life possible, making it the only known element that expands upon solidification. Is the moon neccesary to life on Earth?
Think about it for awhile and the moons purpose and nessecity becomes evident

"You don´t seem to understand satire, do you,"

I understand satire, I just don´t appreciate satire without depth or intelligent meaning

In 1655, three hundred fifty years ago on this date, Dutch astronomer Christiaan Huygens discovered Luna Saturni - now known as Saturn´s moon Titan. To celebrate, consider this intriguing picture of his telescope lens, all that remains of the instrument he used, designed and constructed in collaboration with his brother, Constantijn Huygens. The lens itself measures 57 millimeters (just over 2 inches) in diameter and is inscribed along the border "X 3 FEBR. MDCLV": its focal length (10 Rhineland feet) and the date of its final polishing, 3 February 1655. It also bears a verse from the Roman poet Ovid, "Admovere Oculis Distantia Sidera Nostris" (They brought the distant stars closer to our eyes). Huygens used the verse as part of an anagram announcing his discovery. The use of an anagram, a practice common in his time, established a date for his discovery but kept its details secret until he wished to reveal them. Decoded and translated, his anagram reads "A moon revolves around Saturn in 16 days and 4 hours.", a good agreement with the modern value for Titan´s orbital period.
[link to antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov]

I´m afraid I dont understand the significance of that post about Titan being discovered, but maybe I missed something.
Please elaborate.

Are you implying scientists sometimes hide thier discoveries crypticly?

Links, Data & radar images would be a bonus to back this up. I would think some type of lava chambers, tubes like on earth. But totally hollow? Possible

Thomas, i do not think its a thin , hollow sphere, I think that may be a misinterpretation of what I´m actually saying.

The moon MUST have voids withen it, or large areas of very low density material internally, but siemic data indicates a gradually increasing density toward the core.

It is probable the moon is not terrestrial in origin based on it´s composition, dispite what you might have been told.

I think Nancy lives inside it, or maybe the plant x people do.

the moon is a control ship of the reptilia for the earth... it is hollow and it has exact mathematics for its placement that were to make it a control ship.. Dr. Plickta. is excellent on this.. yes, there are reptiles.. and some humans.. and other critters.. on the moon..
several of the moon missions were faked..

ah ho WIO

STRANGE MOON FACTS
-------------------------------------------------------------​-------------------

Compiled by Ronald Regehr

The moon is the Rosetta stone of the planets." —Robert Jastrow,
First Chairman, NASA Lunar Exploration Committee

After hundreds of years of detailed observation and study, our closest companion in the vast universe, Earth’s moon, remains an enigma. Six moon landings and hundreds of experiments have resulted in more questions being asked than answered. Among them:
1. Moon’s Age: The moon is far older than previously expected. Maybe even older than the Earth or the Sun. The oldest age for the Earth is estimated to be 4.6 billion years old; moon rocks were dated at 5.3 billion years old, and the dust upon which they were resting was at least another billion years older.
2. Rock’s Origin: The chemical composition of the dust upon which the rocks sat differed remarkably from the rocks themselves, contrary to accepted theories that the dust resulted from weathering and breakup of the rocks themselves. The rocks had to have come from somewhere else.
3. Heavier Elements on Surface: Normal planetary composition results in heavier elements in the core and lighter materials at the surface; not so with the moon. According to Wilson, "The abundance of refractory elements like titanium in the surface areas is so pronounced that several geologists proposed the refractory compounds were brought to the moon’s surface in great quantity in some unknown way. They don’t know how, but that it was done cannot be questioned." (Emphasis added).
4. Water Vapor: On March 7, 1971, lunar instruments placed by the astronauts recorded a vapor cloud of water passing across the surface of the moon. The cloud lasted 14 hours and covered an area of about 100 square miles.
5. Magnetic Rocks: Moon rocks were magnetized. This is odd because there is no magnetic field on the moon itself. This could not have originated from a "close call" with Earth—such an encounter would have ripped the moon apart.
6. No Volcanoes: Some of the moon’s craters originated internally, yet there is no indication that the moon was ever hot enough to produce volcanic eruptions.
7. Moon Mascons: Mascons, which are large, dense, circular masses lying twenty to forty miles beneath the centers of the moon’s maria, "are broad, disk-shaped objects that could be possibly some kind of artificial construction. For huge circular disks are not likely to be beneath each huge maria, centered like bull’s-eyes in the middle of each, by coincidence or accident." (Emphasis added).
8. Seismic Activity: Hundreds of "moonquakes" are recorded each year that cannot be attributed to meteor strikes. In November, 1958, Soviet astronomer Nikolay A. Kozyrev of the Crimean Astrophysical Observatory photographed a gaseous eruption of the moon near the crater Alphonsus. He also detected a reddish glow that lasted for about an hour. In 1963, astronomers at the Lowell Observatory also saw reddish glows on the crests of ridges in the Aristarchus region. These observations have proved to be precisely identical and periodical, repeating themselves as the moon moves closer to the Earth. These are probably not natural phenomena.
9. Hollow Moon: The moon’s mean density is 3.34 gm/cm3 (3.34 times an equal volume of water) whereas the Earth’s is 5.5. What does this mean? In 1962, NASA scientist Dr. Gordon MacDonald stated, "If the astronomical data are reduced, it is found that the data require that the interior of the moon is more like a hollow than a homogeneous sphere." Nobel chemist Dr. Harold Urey suggested the moon’s reduced density is because of large areas inside the moon where is "simply a cavity." MIT’s Dr. Sean C. Solomon wrote, "the Lunar Orbiter experiments vastly improved our knowledge of the moon’s gravitational field . . . indicating the frightening possibility that the moon might be hollow." In Carl Sagan’s treatise, Intelligent Life in the Universe, the famous astronomer stated, "A natural satellite cannot be a hollow object."
10. Moon Echoes: On November 20, 1969, the Apollo 12 crew jettisoned the lunar module ascent stage causing it to crash onto the moon. The LM’s impact (about 40 miles from the Apollo 12 landing site) created an artificial moonquake with startling characteristics—the moon reverberated like a bell for more than an hour. This phenomenon was repeated with Apollo 13 (intentionally commanding the third stage to impact the moon), with even more startling results. Seismic instruments recorded that the reverberations lasted for three hours and twenty minutes and traveled to a depth of twenty-five miles, leading to the conclusion that the moon has an unusually light—or even no—core.
11. Unusual Metals: The moon’s crust is much harder than presumed. Remember the extreme difficulty the astronauts encountered when they tried to drill into the maria? Surprise! The maria is composed primarily illeminite, a mineral containing large amounts of titanium, the same metal used to fabricate the hulls of deep-diving submarines and the skin of the SR-71 "Blackbird". Uranium 236 and neptunium 237 (elements not found in nature on Earth) were discovered in lunar rocks, as were rustproof iron particles.
12. Moon’s Origin: Before the astronauts’ moon rocks conclusively disproved the theory, the moon was believed to have originated when a chunk of Earth broke off eons ago (who knows from where?). Another theory was that the moon was created from leftover "space dust" remaining after the Earth was created. Analysis of the composition of moon rocks disproved this theory also. Another popular theory is that the moon was somehow "captured" by the Earth’s gravitational attraction. But no evidence exists to support this theory. Isaac Asimov, stated, "It’s too big to have been captured by the Earth. The chances of such a capture having been effected and the moon then having taken up nearly circular orbit around our Earth are too small to make such an eventuality credible."
13. Weird Orbit: Our moon is the only moon in the solar system that has a stationary, near-perfect circular orbit. Stranger still, the moon’s center of mass is about 6000 feet closer to the Earth than its geometric center (which should cause wobbling), but the moon’s bulge is on the far side of the moon, away from the Earth. "Something" had to put the moon in orbit with its precise altitude, course, and speed.
14. Moon Diameter: How does one explain the "coincidence" that the moon is just the right distance, coupled with just the right diameter, to completely cover the sun during an eclipse? Again, Isaac Asimov responds, "There is no astronomical reason why the moon and the sun should fit so well. It is the sheerest of coincidences, and only the Earth among all the planets is blessed in this fashion."
15. Spaceship Moon: As outrageous as the Moon-Is-a-Spaceship Theory is, all of the above items are resolved if one assumes that the moon is a gigantic extraterrestrial craft, brought here eons ago by intelligent beings. This is the only theory that is supported by all of the data, and there are no data that contradict this theory.





Greek authors Aristotle and Plutarch, and Roman authors Apolllonius Rhodius and Ovid all wrote of a group of people called the Proselenes who lived in the central mountainous area of Greece called Arcadia The Proselenes claimed title to this area because their forebears were there "before there was a moon in the heavens." This claim is substantiated by symbols on the wall of the Courtyard of Kalasasaya, near the city of Tiahuanaco, Bolivia, which record that the moon came into orbit around the Earth between 11,500 and 13, 000 years ago, long before recorded history.
1. Ages of Flashes: Aristarchus, Plato, Eratosthenes, Biela, Rabbi Levi, and Posidonius all reported anomalous lights on the moon. NASA, one year before the first lunar landing, reported 570+ lights and flashes were observed on the moon from 1540 to 1967.
2. Operation Moon Blink: NASA’s Operation Moon Blink detected 28 lunar events in a relatively short period of time.
3. Lunar Bridge: On July 29, 1953, John J. O’Neill observed a 12-mile-long bridge straddling the crater Mare Crisium. In August, British astronomer Dr. H.P. Wilkens verified its presence, "It looks artificial. It’s almost incredible that such a thing could have been formed in the first instance, or if it was formed, could have lasted during the ages in which the moon has been in existence.
4. The Shard: The Shard, an obelisk-shaped object that towers 1½ miles from the Ukert area of the moon’s surface, was discovered by Orbiter 3 in 1968. Dr. Bruce Cornet, who studied the amazing photographs, stated, "No known natural process can explain such a structure."
5. The Tower: One of the most curious features ever photographed on the Lunar surface (Lunar Orbiter photograph III-84M) is an amazing spire that rises more than 5 miles from the Sinus Medii region of the lunar surface.
6. The Obelisks: Lunar Orbiter II took several photographs in November 1966 that showed several obelisks, one of which was more than 150 feet tall. ". . . the spires were arranged in precisely the same was as the apices of the three great pyramids."

Don Ecker, Long Saga of Lunar Anomalies, UFO magazine, Vol. 10, Nol 2 (March/April 1995), p. 23.
Ibid., p. 24
Ibid.
Six Mysterious Statuesque Shadows Photographed on the Moon by Orbiter, The Washington Post, Nov. 22, 1966, p. 1.

[link to www.geocities.com]

Nobel prize winner Harold Urey said that the moon must be hollow in places, too. So, if Phil Plait´s crowd shows up, you can demolish them with this information.

The moon is also made of cheeze

Thank you for your research and for posting it here. I had read some of this somewhere, but couldnt rememeber where, so I wasnt wanting to drop names an get called on it.

The fact is I can determine independantly the moon is hollow, and every intelligent person who anylyses the data will reach the same conclusion.
I find it telling all of the BABBlers thought I was a lunatic for saying the moon was hollow(pun intended, though maybe not effective)

rubbing it in:

"NASA scientist Dr. Gordon MacDonald stated, "If the astronomical data are reduced, it is found that the data require that the interior of the moon is more like a hollow than a homogeneous sphere."

Nobel chemist Dr. Harold Urey suggested the moon’s reduced density is because of large areas inside the moon where is "simply a cavity." MIT’s Dr. Sean C. Solomon wrote, "the Lunar Orbiter experiments vastly improved our knowledge of the moon’s gravitational field . . . indicating the frightening possibility that the moon might be hollow." In Carl Sagan’s treatise, Intelligent Life in the Universe, the famous astronomer stated, "A natural satellite cannot be a hollow object."

Seems I have a lot of company in my "insane, paranoid fantasies"

choke on it.
superior race my ass, now shut your fucking ignorant/stupid trap


ignorance/ stupidity = BABB

-----
Ice floats...
-----

True (Ignorant Dim Wit got one right!)

-----
...making life possible...
-----

Hey! IDW gets another one (Two in one post - may be a new record)

-----
...making it the only known element...
-----

Back on form.

Water is NOT an ELEMENT. Water is a MOLECULE, made up of two parts (by volume) of Hydrogen - H2 (an ELEMENT) and one part of Oxygen - O (another ELEMENT).

-----
...that expands upon solidification.
-----
While expansion upon solidification is rare, water is NOT unique in this respect.

very interesting!

very interesting!

mAKING A TYPOGRAPHICAL ERROR SUCH AS TYPING "ELEMENT" WHERE "COMPOUND" SHOULD HAVE NEEM DOES NOT COME CLOSE TO GOING ON PAGE AFTER PAGE MAKING A TOTAL FUCKTARD OUT OF YOURSELF AND IN THE END BEING PROVEN TOTALLY WRONG.

DIHYDOMONOXIDE-H20

"While expansion upon solidification is rare, water is NOT unique in this respect."


HORSESHIT


Name one compound or element that expands upon solidification from the liquid state.
Just one, fucktard

should read:

Name one NATURALLY OCCURING compound or element that expands upon solidification from the liquid state.
Just one, fucktard


note emphasis through capitolization