Godlike Productions - Discussion Forum
Users Online Now: 1,964 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 224,071
Pageviews Today: 663,122Threads Today: 414Posts Today: 8,214
12:16 PM


Rate this Thread

Absolute BS Crap Reasonable Nice Amazing
 

G1.9 : comet or supernova? Sorcha Faal weighs in

 
divisiontheory
User ID: 845302
United States
01/04/2010 10:34 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
G1.9 : comet or supernova? Sorcha Faal weighs in
January 3, 2010

Russia Prepares For Asteroid Strike As New Comet Nears Sun

By: Sorcha Faal, and as reported to her Western Subscribers

Russian scientists are reporting today that our Sun’s worst Deep Solar Minimum in 100-years has been broken by a newly discovered comet currently plunging towards its surface that has increased this past months Sunspot Number to 15.7, the highest it has been in Solar Cycle 24 since March, 2008, and has caused a massive eruption of C-Class flares for the past 16 days.

Solar physicist David Hathaway of the NASA Marshall Space Flight Center had previously declared in 2008 about Solar Cycle 24 that it was “the blankest year of the space age”, a declaration he revised in 2009 when he stated “This is the quietest sun we've seen in almost a century”.

So powerful has this Deep Solar Minimum been during this cycle that scientists have reported a 50-year low in solar wind pressure, a 55-year low in solar radio emissions, and, most importantly, a 12-year low in solar “irradiance”; the sun's brightness which has dropped by 0.02% at visible wavelengths and 6% at extreme UV wavelengths since the solar minimum of 1996.

The critical danger to our Earth with the dropping of our Sun’s brightness lies in its “irradiance” levels being long associated with periods of Global cooling, including the catastrophic period between the 16th and 19th centuries named the Little Ice Age, a fact which American scientists have been accused of hiding from the public so as to further advance their now discredited theories of Planetary warming.

But to the greatest danger facing our World it is not from the horrific effects a massive Global Cooling event would have upon us, warn Russian scientists, but rather it is from the rising potential of our Earth being struck by, or “electrically interacting” with, a comet emanating from the currently destabilizing Oort Cloud from which these ‘space missiles’ are being increasingly hurled into our Solar System.

One such “electrical interaction” between these Oort Cloud “space missiles” plunging into our inner Solar System towards the Sun is occurring now, and offering further evidence supporting these Russian scientists claims after its discovery this week by Australian amateur astronomer Alan Watson who found this ‘new comet’ while inspecting images obtained by NASA’s STEREO-A's Hemispheric Imager. [Photo top left]

Important to note at this point are that Russian scientists stand adamantly opposed to their American counterparts over what constitutes a comet and defines their interactions in space. Where the American scientists state in their theories that comets are ‘dirty snowballs’ whose tails are formed by the ejection of an icy mass, Russian scientists ascribe to the theory of their being made of iron, and other such metals, and whose tails are formed by the electromagnetic interaction between them and the Sun. This is known as the Electric Comet Theory.

The comet currently plunging into the Sun whose arrival was ‘announced’ over a fortnight ago with the breaking of the Deep Solar Minimum and the mass ejection of solar flares supports the Russian scientist’s theories beyond all doubt, a fact, however, which the Americans will not acknowledge as their theories have never been designed for truth, but rather for the social engineering of their public to keep them as unaware as possible to what the future holds for our Earth.

And to what the American scientists fear above all else is their public becoming aware of the giant planetary body named G1.9 that is heading towards us and is now just 60 AU’s [1 AU=the distance from the Sun to Earth] from our Planet and growing in size.

Though not known to the American people about G1.9 is that since its discovery NASA has continued to maintain that it is the remnant of a supernova explosion that occurred about 140 years ago, an explanation deemed “absurd” by Russian scientists who point out, correctly, that for a supernova to have exploded in our own Solar System in the mid 1800’s it would have been not only visible to the entire Earth, it would have been extensively documented too.

Supporting these Russian scientists who state that G1.9 was never a supernova but either a new planet to our Solar System or a brown dwarf sun are their Spanish astrophysicist counterparts whose findings we can read:

“G1.9 was first identified as a "supernova remnant" in 1984 by Dave Green of the University of Cambridge and later studied in greater detail with NRAO's Very Large Array radio telescope in 1985. Because it was unusually small for a supernova it was thought to be young -- less than about 1000 years old.

But in 2007, X-ray observations made with NASA's Chandra X-ray Observatory revealed that the object was much larger than the last time it was observed! It had grown in size by 16%. Puzzled by this observation, the Very Large Array repeated its observations of 23 years ago and verified that it had increased in size considerably. Knowing that supernova do not expand this quickly, unless they have just exploded, they explained that G1.9 must be a "very young" supernova -- perhaps not more than 150 years old. But no record of a visible supernova has been found corresponding to that historical period (about the time of the American Civil War).

Spanish astronomers have tracked this object with great interest because they were anticipating its appearance. Gravitational anomalies have been appearing in the Oort Cloud for some time, suggesting the perturbations were caused by a nearby object with considerable mass. The announcement that G1.9 had increased in size was no mystery to them. It is exactly what they would expect as the object moved closer to Earth.”

To the potential catastrophic danger posed to our Earth by G1.9 was evidenced in July, 2009, when the Planet Jupiter was hit by a large comet that entered its planetary zone unexpectedly, despite the efforts of astronomers to track these dangerous objects. Russian and Spanish astronomers contend that the comet that struck Jupiter was perturbed by the trajectory of G1.9, which until now, was not recognized and accounted for.

Though the Americans contend, also, that G1.9 has reached its closest approach to Earth in its orbit, Russian scientists couldn’t disagree more and point to the fact that NASA has so ‘continually failed’ in their explanations for this giant, and growing, “as yet unknown” space object as to have lost all credibility in any discussion of it.

And so alarmed have these Russian scientists become that this past week that Anatoly Perminov, head of Russia’s space agency, told Voice of Russia radio that they were ‘gearing up’ to protect our Earth from these ‘space missiles’, including the Apophis asteroid many believe could strike our Planet in the 2030’s.

In the reporting of these events it is also important to note that the ancient peoples of our Earth spoke many times about a G1.9 type object in our solar system (Marduk, Nibiru, Planet X) and warned that when it approached our inner Solar System chaos and catastrophe always ensued.
Anonymous Coward (OP)
User ID: 845302
United States
01/04/2010 10:39 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: G1.9 : comet or supernova? Sorcha Faal weighs in
Sorcha Faal has a point, that any supernova in the skies in 1870 would have been widely noticed, reported, and documented all over the world.

No such supernova was reported.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 317023
United States
01/04/2010 11:13 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: G1.9 : comet or supernova? Sorcha Faal weighs in
So what's the expected fly-by date of G1.9? Anyone taking any guesses?
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 835911
United States
01/04/2010 11:16 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: G1.9 : comet or supernova? Sorcha Faal weighs in
So what's the expected fly-by date of G1.9? Anyone taking any guesses?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 317023

Start reading
Thread: spanish astronomers has found out, that NASA make a mistake.
Full Circle

User ID: 856074
Canada
01/04/2010 11:17 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: G1.9 : comet or supernova? Sorcha Faal weighs in
I knew I was excited by that NASA announcement on G1.9 for a reason.
Born into this World
We create echoes of our inward yearnings
And Shift along the Axis
From matter to Spirit
- Scott Mutter
Guest
User ID: 860127
United States
01/08/2010 11:45 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: G1.9 : comet or supernova? Sorcha Faal weighs in
Ok nut jobs, read and learn.
Nasa measures the age of nove events to be from when the light of the event first reaches Earth.
The 140 year old super nova occured roughly 20,000 years ago, but it's x-rays reached earth about 140 years ago. The reason no one noticed this supernove 140 years ago is that the star in question resides near the galactic core, and is obscured by dust. Chandra looks for x-rays which pass through dust clouds, (hence the name "Chandra X-ray Observatory").
The size of the supernova remnants are expanding, because thats what happens when things blow up in space. It is not because the star or some planetary mass is flying towards us.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 859931
Germany
01/08/2010 11:54 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: G1.9 : comet or supernova? Sorcha Faal weighs in
So what's the expected fly-by date of G1.9? Anyone taking any guesses?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 317023

21 dec 2012
Anonymous 843492

User ID: 843492
United Kingdom
01/08/2010 12:05 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: G1.9 : comet or supernova? Sorcha Faal weighs in
If comets are made of iron, why does the earth pass through debris left over from them (meteor showers) and why can we read the chemical signature of the comets to tell what they are made of?

Probably more iron in a bowl of corn flakes, pound for pound. lol
If you tolerate this your children will be next.
Thats Great!
User ID: 862448
United States
01/11/2010 03:51 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: G1.9 : comet or supernova? Sorcha Faal weighs in
So what's the expected fly-by date of G1.9? Anyone taking any guesses?

21 dec 2012
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 859931

I laughed so hard when I saw your comment/answer! I really hope your answer was meant to be funny! lolsign
DarthSinstar666

User ID: 1213338
United States
01/01/2011 02:55 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: G1.9 : comet or supernova? Sorcha Faal weighs in
I am very interested in all of this.I have an open mind,but from the evidence I have seen so far I am leaning a little toward thinking this thing might just be a brown dwarf and close by.To be fair I want to point out I did read an article saying the scientist that support the supernova remnant theory claim the reason it would not have been seen in the 1800's is because it was close to the center of the galaxy and would have been obscured.I am not sure I buy that,but I wanted to point it out that they did have an explanation for why it wasn't seen,just maybe not a very good one.

Last Edited by DarthSinstar666 on 01/01/2011 03:00 AM





GLP