In September 2003 the British government was effectively overthrown

[link to pages.123-reg.co.uk]


Would you believe that in September 2003 the British government was effectively overthrown by one person using an old computer printer and some office stationery? This is the big British secret that´s been increasingly difficult to contain, and now it´s being blown wide open!
He took a sheet of A4 paper and typed. He attached a copy of a police complaint he had filed a year earlier, and mailed these two sheets to 3000 people and institutions at the top of British society - MPs, police, judiciary, the military, universities, media, and celebrities and famous people. He didn´t use his name because he wasn´t seeking personal publicity and everyone knew who he was from the police complaint. And when he got angry about six months later, in March 2004 he sent them another sheet - like the Pied Piper when he wasn´t paid. So two mailshots in all. Three sheets of paper. Read them for yourself on the left, reproduced here exactly as they first appeared.
But the British people have to ask themselves why they could only find out about this - the most important event ever to hit their nation - on a website.

I have to tell the British people that the powerful and the famous treat them as they have always done - with utter contempt. They regard you as ´the great unwashed´. You don´t need to know anything. You just need to keep your heads down and toil. The BBC think that all you want in life is to become famous, which can never happen, and that they hold the power over that. They take billions in licence fees, have the biggest news organization in the country, and what do British viewers get for news at 6pm on BBC1? Two idiots alternating government friendly headlines over silly drums. It´s total nonsense - but also a total scandal. Shouldn´t they have told you that three sheets of A4 have turned the entire country on its head? If you don´t pay the licence fee you go to jail. By law they HAVE to tell you the news; they can´t censor it and feed you tripe. For this alone the BBC must be axed. ITN and ITV are supposed to be regulated too. They have all seriously breached their charters and licences in every way. They have to inform, educate and entertain, without bias or censorship against any individual, group or party. In fact there´s no point tuning in anywhere or buying a copy of anything. There´s been a total news blackout for over twelve months and they´ll never be able to explain that away in the future. Whether it´s the Government or Establishment or Royals, or the media, TV, film and entertainment world - all anyone´s been talking about for the last year is those three sheets of paper. But you have to remain in the dark; left outside, with your noses pressed up against the glass, to keep them where they are.

(The media blackout has totally undermined democracy. I have turned the country on it´s head, yet the public have been kept in the dark. How can the electorate vote now when they have been misinformed? Parliamentary democracy has been invalidated at a stroke. How can police tell protesters to demonstrate peacefully and use the ballot box instead of violence when there´s been a news blackout? News of me might have influenced the public to vote differently or forced political parties to change their policies even more. And say I wanted to stand for parliament as an independent. I´ve changed the country more in the last twelve months than Tony Blair has in the last seven years, yet I´m unknown to the public, and the media are biased in the intense extreme against me due to petty professional jealousy - they have everything to lose. [In fact, the BBC has a duty to provide the highest quality programming possible for the money they have. If they could continue improving their output by giving me more and more money, they are obligated to do that, until no further money paid could achieve further cost-effective gains in quality, innovation, entertainment value etc. Even if it meant paying me one percent of their total budget])

Since September 2003 the country has been revolving around those three bits of paper. You may not have been told anything, but now you know why people on TV have been behaving so oddly or appearing so gloomy. Many are depressed. Some are suicidal. Some worry about the country. Most worry about themselves. If there´s somebody out there that can do all this, then shouldn´t he do everything and run everything? No need for celebrities or actors or politicians to feel superior to the masses. Compared to him they´re ordinary! (Sept 04)

Update, Nov 04
The point about this website is that you can be really mischievous about the most deadly serious matters in the world, because it´s all HILARIOUS!
Even the police complaint - it´s a serious complaint about a serious matter, but isn´t it funny?
The bit that´s really eating away at people is Sheet 3, para 1-3. The bit about 1960. The best bit! So they´re trying to make their own jokes about ´medication´ and ´men in white coats´. I know that obviously some of you are a bit slow. The rest of you - look around you. Look at people. Give it a week. Notice anything?
Every word of this website is true; that´s why the secret service needn´t bother. I think I´ll die laughing!

Notes

1. The first sheet was a photocopy of a complaint against the Metropolitan Police I made a year earlier, details as follows: It was filed in person at Ilford Police Station on 6 October 2002 and also by post to both the Police Complaints Authority, 10 Great George Street SW1 and to the Metropolitan Police Commissioner Sir John Stevens at New Scotland Yard. I received a letter from Ilford Police Station, dated 7 October 2002 informing me that a Chief Superintendent Johnson was arranging a full reply, and one dated 24 October from a Detective Chief Inspector C. Ramsay of Internal Investigations Command, Edmonton, which said my complaint was being forwarded to Borough Commander Redbridge, and that an officer from the borough would contact me by 6 November. Then another letter from Ilford Police Station dated 31 October asked for a meeting with a Sergeant Graeme Brown. He gave me the numbers of the two officers I had complained about as PC553JI and PC627JI both of Ilford Police Station. On November 8 I received a telephone call from the Duty Officer from Ilford Police Station for another meeting, and I met this Inspector that day. I then received a letter from a Detective Inspector J Chamberlain requesting a meeting which then took place for two hours at Internal Investigation Command, Edmonton Police Station on 19 December 2002, where I also met with an officer Roman Jacyna.
I received a letter dated 25 February 2003 from a David Delaney of the Police Complaints Authority telling me they had received the file of the completed investigation from the police into my complaint against them, that my reference number was 2003/303/001179, and that I would be receiving their final verdict later. I received the final letter, dated 17 March 2003 from a Marcus G Williams, Member of the Police Complaints Authority telling me that he was satisfied that my complaint had been properly investigated and that he was ´not satisfied that there is a realistic prospect that a tribunal would find that the conduct of the officers fell below the required standard´ and that he was ´minded to conclude that misconduct proceedings cannot be justified´.

2. The second sheet was written in August 2003, using smaller print to fit onto the two sides of a single sheet of paper. The first and second sheet were put together into white self-seal envelopes, eventually 3000 of which were posted second class during the first two weeks of September 2003.

3. The third sheet, a single side of A4, was written and posted in March 2004.




2000 copies to: The Police, the Government, the media, and you

Read the enclosed complaint against the police I filed on 6 October 2002 in person at Ilford Police Station and by post to Met Commissioner Sir John Stevens and the PCA. For over a year now I have been relentlessly stalked in a huge, extremely intense and totally sinister secret service operation. I am a total genius - the type that you only find in fiction - and just like in fiction, the State wants me dead. I want 50M compensation for: 1. Over a dozen serious attempts on my life, and dozens more hopeful attempts (e.g. a varied fleet of dangerous heavy vehicles swarming round me every time I get into my car, awaiting ahead of me to suddenly pull out, swerve, fatally collide etc); 2. A year of crazy surveillance, which when coupled with assassination attempts, was meant to intimidate and mentally torture; 3. Twenty years ago, during the seventies and eighties, examiners being verbally instructed to downmark all Asian candidates; and 4. The secret service blackballing my career in painting when I left college because I was ´a security threat´ - wasn´t white and could draw and paint better than everyone else.

I was born and educated in London. I am not from a Muslim family, don´t bother to vote or protest or go on demonstrations, don´t believe in violence, and think that even minor laws and byelaws should be obeyed. There is no reason for the secret service two levels above MI6, with their infinite resources , to harass me from June 2002 onwards just because they think I´m the cleverest person in the world. All these years I have been on benefits and minded my own business. When, out of the blue, I suddenly began to be followed about, I realized that I had been blacklisted years ago. I put notices on my windscreen asking for compensation for sixteen years´ loss of earnings. Then I started to photograph them. They panicked, and tried to set me up. But they also started to try and kill me.




So? What is all this? It´s no use people telling themselves ´He has to be mad because if he isn´t, it´s the end of life as we know it´. That´s like the scientific establishment saying ´The occult and paranormal has to be nonsense, because if it isn´t, that´s all of us and two hundred years of established scientific thinking down the drain´. So what if the drain´s blocked with them all? I´m no fruitcake. Anyway, just what sort of a country is this? Downmark Asian children, discriminate against them later on in life, and particularly blacklist any geniuses so they go on the dole, then stalk and intimidate them and try and kill them? The Queen warns Paul Burrell that "There are forces at work of which we have no knowledge." Carole Caplin´s mother is reported in the press as becoming reclusive and no longer wanting to go to Chequers after the Peter Foster affair because of ´shadowy´ forces stalking her. Al Fayed is emigrating to Switzerland because he is "forced out by the establishment´s invisible forces". The FBU leader reports during the strike of being stalked by ´person or persons unknown´. The Mail of 9 August reports of James Hewitt: ´He takes one last look through the heavy, ornate drapes. (He´s been periodically looking out of the window all evening.) "They´re everywhere," he tells me. "They watch my every move. And I´m not just talking about the press." He hints at being followed by certain shadowy forces, but won´t be drawn when I ask him to say more. "I don´t know who they are. MI5, MI6, News of the World, you tell me."´ June 10 Channel Four News reporting on the JIC about the Iraq dossiers, shows a document listing a table of the intelligence agencies and their representatives contributing information. We see, typewritten, agencies like MI5, MI6, GCHQ, and also ----. The reporter ends the report with amused consternation, "...and which intelligence agency is too secret even to have a name?" as we close in on one line in the table which is just a row of ---- (hyphens).

On the morning of Sunday 29 September 2002 at 8.20am, the secret service blew my rear left tyre out at 70mph near junction 3 westbound on the M4. Within days they then used the police to frame me for ´photographing young girls´. On top of this, if there can be a top of this, the two police officers and security guard from Harrison Gibson made racist jokes about me. This was nightmare persecution by the state in the extreme. I was called in to police stations for discussion on three occasions where they put extreme pressure on me to withdraw the complaint and accept an unofficial apology. I was told that they completely believed my account but I was educated, clever; the offenders simple coppers etc. How come it was then pooh-poohed by the PCA? The Police Complaints Authority is a totally corrupt arm of the state. Not worthless; of negative worth. And where is the secret service complaints authority? These people sabotage passenger aircraft. They don´t go to prison. They get handsomely paid. MI6 headquarters could be converted to an instant prison, cheaply and practically; concrete up the exits during a working day, in the guise of repairs, with them all inside, and presto! You´ve really saved taxpayers some cash. (And saved some taxpayers a crash.) The top brass police are now actively seeking my assassination. Yes, police. Money is on the table for my execution. With all this going on, it´s time for... footy...




I am a better footballer than George Best ever was, so how come they get 100K a week and I get Income Support? On receipt of my PCA rejection in March, I sent a circular to the press, TV, FA and Prime Minister outlining all the corruption in football. I wrote that as well as all the other corruption and fixing and foreign betting and phoney England free-kicks in the last minute, all the money in football comes from the top teams appearing on TV, and that match officials are paid to make games exciting. 1-0 becomes 1-1 rather than 2-0 etc. Refs make Manchester United win the title because it is more lucrative for the FA. To complete the picture now, let me add that the Premiership is rigged to squeeze out as much money and maintain as much all round interest as possible. There is just SO MUCH money at stake that all the players are on the same side, performing display-like show games. What about the secret John Fashanu tapes made by The News of the World? (July 27 and Aug 3) Why haven´t the police been investigating, let alone the FA? Why haven´t TV news covered this ground-breaking story? (Other sports are bent too. I remember the Nat West triangular tournament a couple of years ago, and umpire Shepherd allowing England one no ball after another - unreachable even with the tip of the bat - to try and prevent the visitors make winning runs in the last over; and umpires at Wimbledon always help Henman to proceed as far as he can.) But it´s football that´s rotted through. Spot the Ball should be replaced with Spot the Brown Paper Bag (using off-pitch photos). After I sent those letters, everyone in football became very gloomy; but you shouldn´t have deceived all the fans. How could the government have allowed clubs to think of themselves as businesses? Do fans support Tesco or ICI? Pay dearly for them to succeed? Football clubs belong to fans, and the locality. The FA took football off terrestrial TV to line their pockets and now kids on council estates couldn´t watch. Sky built themselves on taking football off TV, and ruined football by starting wage escalation, a spiral which then forced clubs to extort money. Let me introduce now the main principle, not just in football, by which the public are cheated. It´s a Del Boy principle that´s easy to understand. Whenever vast sums change hands in business deals, a percentage is creamed off and split both ways into back pockets, and easily covered by fake accounting. As sums got bigger, everyone´s back pocket prospered, except the poor fans´. (Small shopkeepers keep two books, the self-employed don´t declare their earnings, and when a newspaper recently handed in sixteen coats containing cash and owner´s details to London railway stations, only five were returned. Take that up a few steps, and wherever large deals take place, the public is cheated. Add to that the fact that, as an ex-MI6 officer described, the very purpose of MI6 is to bribe foreigners - above MI6 the secret service bribe everyone [from paying football personalities to pretend to put their own money into a football club and to talk and write favourably about football, to paying TV executives for favourable royal reviews and getting complete non-starters like the Queen Mother funeral off the ground by endless live broadcasting; from paying political TV correspondents to say ´Good performance today by the government at the Hutton Enquiry´, to paying for some news story to suddenly break and take the Queen or PM off the headlines - ´Posh Kidnap Foiled´ or ´Rowdy fans force plane to land in Cardiff´ etc] and since the secret service are busy bribing everyone and lining their own pockets, so that´s a green light for everyone at the top of society to grab the cash on the table in a complete free-for-all, while the public work hard all day every day for 20 or 30K to pay for it all.)

Splitting the railways up wasn´t great. And the track was in a terrible state through ´decades of underinvestment´. Railtrack was a solid company doing an impossible job. If Network Rail perform some track maintenance and replacement for £12M or £15M; and Railtrack did it for 6M (of which £4M was a subsidy from government), and made a profit to shareholders of £0.5M - that´s still a good deal for rail users, however bad the service seemed. Stephen Byers used spin to highlight the subsidy and the profit Railtrack made, and asked a judge to put it in administration - all bogus. He effectively renationalized without paying shareholders, in broad daylight, announcing it as the Allies started bombing Afghanistan. Experienced engineers and managers, owners of the shares, left in droves. Byers´ action cost taxpayers tens of billions. Lawyers and others made billions. The cost of running the railways hasn´t increased, but multiplied. Private money, no longer keen, is again invited to fund everything but because of the risk, only if taxpayers guarantee greater profits and underwrite it. The subsidy which Byers used as an excuse is now peanuts to the colossal cost/waste to the taxpayer. Everyone has creamed off hundreds of millions. And now its possible to continue creaming money off every new bit of new expenditure because it´s public funds. And they needlessly close lines all weekend because they no longer have the know-how. Everywhere you look in society; nothing but corruption. Why fuss about ´health tourism´ when you have a worse scandal; all the needless new hospitals everywhere? ´Pssst! Build a new hospital, accept our tender of £150M and we´ll put £15M in your back pockets.´ Think of how that money could transform patient treatment and care while keeping the old and perfectly good hospital building. A needless new Paddington hospital is going to cost a billion. The country stinks.




"This is my boss, Dodi Fayed; his dad´s a self-made millionaire. He´s quite a guy... This´ll be Mrs F; she´s gorgeous! She´s one lady who knows how to take care of herself. By the way, my name is Henri Paul; I take care of both of them, which ain´ easy, ´cos when they met... it was moider!"
"You don´t believe it was a simple accident?" "There´s more to it than that - there´s more to it - but I don´t have access to that kind of information." (Paul Burrell, BBC1, 11pm, 27 May.) Audiotel International, communications consultant John Nelson and audio expert Martin Colloms all concluded that the Squidgygate tapes were not just normal mobile phone calls picked up accidently by two separate radio enthusiasts. A 50 hertz hum on the tape suggested a tap on an ordinary landline; spectrum analysis showed this was made up in places of two separate signals indicating two separate tapes mixed down to one - doctoring. Phoney ´pips´ or data-bursts had been added at eleven second intervals to make it seem like a mobile call. Real pips would have been filtered out at the nearest exchange prior to Cellnet transmission. ´The recording must have been made as a result of local tapping of the telephone line somewhere between the female party´s telephone itself and the local exchange,´ reported the experts. (Only secret service had access to Diana´s direct line at Sandringham and to the palace´s own exchange.) Cellnet confirmed that it had come to these exact same conclusions during its own internal investigation of August 1992. Their spokesman Willliam Ostrom said the conversation was definately not recorded off air but was an example of sophisticated eavesdropping on a landline. The call was recorded by the enthusiasts on Jan 4, four days after the conversation took place, so a third party recorded the call and rebroadcast it on the Cellnet frequency over and over until enthusiasts picked it up. "It was done to discredit me in a serious manner, " said Diana on Panorama.
Henri Paul´s salary - 20K; cost of his flying lessons - 150K; huge amounts deposited in bank account before crash, 2K found on body; boasted of working for foreign secret services, confirmed by friend Claude Garrec and ex-MI6 officer Richard Tomlinson; all 17 traffic cameras strangely malfunctioned/ switched off for first time ever; blinding flash witnessed before crash; highly equipped hospitals expected crash victims within 2-3 min. but Diana ´treated´ on the spot for almost ONE HOUR, then put in ambulance to furthest hospital, which crawled and kept stopping; journey of 4 miles along barren streets took amazing FORTY-THREE minutes (average 6mph !); ambulance ´lost´ police escort, stopped for ten minutes several hundred yards from hospital (!), and guaranteed her death; effectively dead on arrival at operating theatre; surgeons say she should have easily survived - simple to speed her to hospital (while still receiving whatever treatment she supposedly received) and open up her chest - routine procedure; crash tunnel was disinfected, scrubbed clean, opened in 4 hours - destroying all forensic evidence; at Henri Paul´s supposed blood alcohol level of 1.75 g/l impossible to drive at all; supposed carbon monoxide level of 20.7% - associated with vomiting, headache and difficulty in standing; James Andanson drove white Fiat whose paint samples exactly matched those found at crash, was an MI6 agent within paparazzi, flew out of Paris 6 hours after crash, was implicated in ´suicide´ of French PM in 1993; Andanson found dead in burnt out car in June 2000; initially ´suicide´, later police agreed murdered. There are a few further points. On the night of Sept 3 1997 the flat of Sipa Agency photographer Lionel Cherruault in North London was professionally broken into and computer equipment taken; detectives astonished him next morning by telling him he ´had not been burgled´. "Special Branch, MI5, MI6, call it what you like..." said the officer. Weeks after Andanson was murdered in 2000, armed men took over the Paris Sipa Agency office (Andanson´s latest agency) for three hours. They, also, took away computers, unconcerned for the arrival of police, who never came despite urgent calls. Hostages were convinced the men were from some branch of the French secret service. Most important of all, ex-MI6 officer Richard Tomlinson reveals that back in 1992 he saw a document suggesting assassinating the Serbian leader President Milosevic by causing his personal limousine to crash with a strobe flash, in a tunnel because there the proximity of concrete close to the road would ensure a sufficiently violent crash and also reduce the chance of witnesses. He says, "The plan was fully typed, and attached to a yellow ´minute board´, signifying that this was a formal and accountable document. It will therefore still be in existence. Dr. N. Fishwick, MI6, in charge of planning Balkan operations, had annotated that this document be circulated to the following senior MI6 officers: M. Kendwrick-Piercey, head of Balkan operations; J. Ridde, security officer for Balkan operations; R. Fletcher, head of Eastern European Controllerate; and A. Petty, personal secretary to Chief of MI6 Colin McColl." (Search ´Richard Tomlinson Affidavit´ on the net.)




The Burrell trial was a farce. The Queen sitting in the back of a car with Charles suddenly ´remembers´ a conversation with Burrell, and that stops a mammoth trial? Why wasn´t the Queen questioned before the trial? What was the funny rule by which the judge could halt the trial and have discussions behind closed doors? The whole justice system is a pompous charade. I was always taught that the Queen was just a figurehead for the tourists and that this was a modern democracy where every citizen was equal to the Queen. That was nonsense, wasn´t it? Why do MPs, police, armed forces and everybody swear loyalty to the Queen and not the people? Why aren´t we told the exact constitution? You can´t murder left, right and centre. NO! It´s now obvious that the State murdered the Princess of Wales with taxpayers money. All these people must be brought to justice. The Queen was obviously consulted on the murder. If the Queen were guilty of conspiracy to murder, how would the machinery cope? Is she above the law? WHY? Why are all prosecutions brought in the name of the Queen?

The CPS is a totally corrupt arm of the state, which is now becoming mentally deranged. I have made them sick of life, it seems. They don´t want to send anyone to jail any more because they want me in jail! I know it´s silly! Look at the John Leslie trial. Worse is the Brian Stevens trial. I´m photographing sinister stalkers in a busy public square, and I´m threatened with arrest for ´photographing young girls´; and a policeman whose credit card details the FBI passed on for accessing a paedophile website, whose laptop downloaded the images, who posed as a thirteen year old girl in an internet chatroom, who´s accused of assaulting two schoolgirls, goes free? How come an experienced paedophile detection unit is to be broken up? How come a judge suddenly rules that police can´t trap international drug traffickers by using undercover money? Corruption in the police and the judiciary. Did I say the country stinks? How did the MOD find the Deepcut deaths to be suicide? How did Surrey Police agree? ´Cover up´ is too soft an expression. These men are liars,aren´t they? Only an independent expert, commissioned by relatives, uncovered the blatantly obvious truth. Do all crime victims have to now commission their own experts and investigators because the police are liars? If this is how the MOD investigates their own deaths, what kind of investigation will they make of those rolls of film given for processing containing images of British troops torturing / abusing Iraqis?



Why did we attack Iraq? Why did we attack Afghanistan? Now we´re all at risk. Churchill first gassed the Kurds over seventy years ago. Why is he the Greatest Briton and not Chemical Churchill? And armed by the West, Saddam Hussein gassed the Kurds fifteen years ago - but was our ally; I would see the horrible reports on Newsnight and Panorama. Why did all the Labour Front Bench vote against motions against Saddam Hussein at the time? Iraq is in such a run down state because of ten years of brutally crippling sanctions. And the US needs vast quantities of oil and has none; for Saudi oil they had 30,000 troops stationed there. They´re terrified that no one will sell them any because they´re hated. Bomb Iraq to bits safely from the air, get extremely lucrative contracts to rebuild it (giving none to other countries) - already a winner - and take Iraqi oil instead of cash - brilliant! US defence contracts were already booming - already loads of backhanders to US officials. More rebuilding contracts; more backhanders - and an enormous backhander to Bush from the mystery Middle Eastern countries that wanted Saddam out. You need Blair onside for the war though, so? All together: Give him a backhander! Leave the mess of Iraq now totally to the US (and UK). [Twenty-five years ago the CIA went into liberal Afghanistan and stirred them to become fundamentalist and violent to force the Russians to try and stabilize it all by invading; they then pumped millions into building training camps and urging Bin Laden and Muslims to become soldiers and fight them. $51M was spent 1984 - 1994 just on ´education´ programs; books teaching children to count with pictures of tanks, missiles and landmines, and with pictures like one showing a resistance fighter with ammo belts and a Kalashnikov over his shoulders - but his head missing - and above a Koran verse and below a Pashtu tribute to the mujaheddin who are described as obedient to Allah: ´Such men will sacrifice their wealth and life itself to impose Islamic law on the government.´ (Former director of CIA Robert Gates in his memoirs, From the Shadows; former National Security Advisor to President Carter Zbigniew Brzezinski in interview with French magazine Le Nouvel Observateur; and Stephens and Ottaway of the Washington Post; From the USA, the ABCs of jihad)]

The Hutton Enquiry is a sham. Why did he cry ´Shut that door!´ to the TV cameras? The old trick of holding a long, drawn out and tedious enquiry, and when the story´s dead, a quiet verdict of ´Blame on both sides, blah blah blah; lessons to be learnt, no deliberate wrongs, no further action´. It´s completely corrupt and fixed. Forget Hutton´s verdict. We can see for ourselves. Where are the WMD? Two ice cream vans, and that´s it? A couple of ´Mind that child´ signs, in Arabic, and they´ll be completely harmless. Now we´re told that the 45 minute claim was hearsay, and related to battlefield mortars and small ordnance? Words fail me. Almost. The truth is that the backhander is the basic payment of the MP, not his salary or expenses. They look on it as the basic perk that makes them do the job. The Cabinet was paid off to go to war. Full stop. When the document that incriminated George Galloway for taking payments from Saddam was found in Iraq, nobody batted an eyelid. That´s what MPs do. The corrupt establishment looks on the public with contempt. Freemasonry and secret societies should be declared by law in public life. Abolish the honours system. It´s quite disgraceful. Tony Blair and Jack Straw have been on the waiting list for five years to join a select dining club called Nobody´s Friends. It´s ridiculous!

Two final points. 1. It will make many sick; but AIDS was engineered. A ´final solution´ to ´overpopulation, defectives and selected racial groups´. 2. The big one. There´s something that governments really should have told the public ever since the late 1940s.



Imagine some far off country where every baby born after 00.00hrs on 1st January 1960 was unintelligent, and the majority of them were actually stupid! Nothing but stupid people born from 1960 to the present! Imagine that! And imagine if immigrant races were unaffected; imagine if only the indigenous majority race were affected! So if a mother in this country gave birth on one side of midnight (1959) - normal baby, maybe brilliant baby; other side of midnight (1960) - unintelligent baby, maybe really stupid baby! A mother on one side of the country´s borders - baby thicko; but over the other side - normal birth! Imagine this scenario continuing year after year, decade after decade, on and on... A person´s intelligence shows in the features; a stupid country would be there for all to see! A few of the 1960+ group might be quite clever. A few would be good at what they do. And the effect would be less noticable in women than men. Nevertheless, we are talking about potato doom.

As the intelligent, pre-1960 generation aged, immigrants would more and more desperately be required to flood in and keep everything going. But these people would have to be warned about the following issues: Immigrant couples where both were also of a different race (colour and racial type) to the host nation would give birth to normal babies in their new country and wouldn´t be affected at all. However, mixed race couples, where one was different race but the other was of host race colour and racial type (either native or foreign) would have partially affected babies, and more affected if this host race parent was native instead of foreign. Immigrants who were both foreign, but both of same race as host nation, would have partially affected babies, but more so than the previous case. Both these couples would benefit from going abroad to have their babies. Non-immigrant, native couples would partially benefit from this tactic, if any chose to.

Just picture this land, then. Imagine whole schools, away from immigrant areas, up and down the country, packed with stupid children. And stupid teachers. Vital positions filled by stupid graduates for twenty years. Stupid doctors, nurses, barristers, planners having had many years to be stupid in. Policemen not just getting younger. Firemen stupid. Ambulance crews stupid. Stupid emergency personnel putting stupid lives at risk. Essential businesses and services running down and crippling the nation. Drinking houses full. Libraries empty. Bookshops stocked with dumbed-down pap. New road layouts that worsen congestion. Rubbish TV... and so on, and on, and on... ...A stupid knock on the door? That would mean a stupid court, stupid evidence, stupid forensics, stupid jury... Demand a jury of immigrants and pensioners! Unless guilty. Stupid army. Stupid air force. Stupid navy. Stupid secret service. Got funds to invest? Stupid stock market. Stupid engineers, scientists, technicians - all to be let loose on everything from loading calculations for bridges to redesigning the national grid. At every tenuous link in a once modern, technological society; from the design and manufacture of the tiniest and most basic component or commodity to the organization of the simplest trade or business - the layout of a supermarket car park or queueing system at a bank or railway station - the successive and culminative effect of one incompetent decision after another making the simple experience of living, or existing, increasingly tedious, even impossible...

The moral of this story is : Always pay your way. Clear your debts. Pay your dues. Theft doesn´t pay, in the end.




Do you like my 1960 fable? Only a total genius could have created it. Do you see now why you should never have taunted or attempted to fight the total genius? I didn´t want to have to write about such a dark and brutal thing, but I´ve really lost patience. Over a million copies of that open letter I wrote seven months ago are now circulating around Britain. It explained everything, yet the authorities, media - everyone - has decided to dump all the core human values of civilization, and instead try to gang up on me. All I get from every quarter is the most incredible jealousy you could imagine. Really snide unpleasantness. Today (17 March 2004), MI5 had a contract out on me; I think a knife attack was planned. How can this continue to be allowed? Do you know that over fifty MPs want me killed, and a dozen are actually lobbying for my assassination? (Still doggedly insisting I´m mad as you read this? "Barking. Totally... barking." But, in the circumstances, isn´t that a bit... mad?)

After I wrote that September letter, Britain started to collapse. And America has gone slightly strange. Yes, I can see all that. But I still had to write this. Why has the secret service still been trying to run my younger brother and me over in the road? Why still all the silly surveillance? Why all the aircraft still buzzing overhead? And , most irritatingly, WHY ARE YOU STILL GOADING ME THROUGH THE MEDIA? Accept total, total genius. Accept that this is a two dimensional world filled with two dimensional people. You. You´re all flat. Only the total genius isn´t. I am putting all these ideas to you in an unpleasant way because you have been very unpleasant indeed. There is just one total genius, and all fictional characters, all heroes, all mythology is based on him (and his younger brother). He gave you science, law, government, philosophy, art, music - everything. He runs through history like Brighton rock. All he ever received in return was intense jealousy, but still he gave you these things. Today, nothing has changed. He´s here again, and still he finds the same two dimensional people; but television and cinema have come along and, strangely, the simple folk have started identifying the simple actors with the parts they´re playing!



Look: In real life, when an actor fills his car with fuel, he drives into the petrol station, fills up, walks over, pays, engages in simple small talk, and leaves; just like everybody else who fills up. In a screen role though, a nerdy geek of a writer has been drafting and redrafting this petrol station scene all afternoon. Others have then sat round a table and made improvements to the scenario; made the hero´s dialogue even wittier, cooler; added more stylish ways of getting out of the car, of glancing around, of flicking the props about etc etc. This has all then been professionally staged, lit and photographed in a carefully chosen location; and then an experienced actor has memorized all the dialogue of all the players in advance, rehearsed it over and over, and then in his carefully selected costume, he´s been expertly directed through every move. This has then been skilfully edited and put to music! But this actor is more boring than boredom itself. In real life, except for the total genius, everyone is boring. Pop, fashion, art - it´s all rubbish! Unless he does these things. (By the way, artists invented modern art because of fear of photography. And you fell for it! The human brain thinks in images, not abstract shapes. Any thought you have; any idea, any memory, all will be thought in mental images. You think of your childhood. In images. You think of a loved one. In images. You think of what to have for dinner. In images. Every thought you´ll ever have - image after image. What does an abstract shape mean to a human being? NOTHING! It´s valueless. And dishonest. In society certain people are always drawn toward deception; they become modern artists. Everyone else is too honest. Tell every member of the public that they can give up their jobs to be modern artists, and you´ll have millions of works - all as good as the professionals´ - and all rubbish! And yes, we all marvel at technology and industrial processes and materials, but why bring it all into an art gallery? It´s meaningless. Anyone can spend time and money creating these displays.)



Supposedly, in this world, merit and excellence are celebrated. But I can do everything better than everyone else on earth. Why do I have to apologize for it? Isn´t it supposed to be amazing? And Britain is a terribly racist country; the most racist in the entire world; isn´t it a bit late to try and suddenly remedy it just because you found out about me? Why didn´t you put Asians in adverts before? In football? In popular culture? If Asians make up a tenth of the population, you don´t put an Asian in every tenth bit part or as every tenth extra, but in every tenth lead role on TV, every tenth pop act, every tenth top job.

Finally, I want to say that I posted my open letter to everyone at the beginning of September 2003. Nearly seven months ago. Not only was it urgent that my issues were immediately addressed by government and media, but it was also the most amazing document. You all ganged together and pretended to look the other way! Don´t I exist, then? I asked for fifty million pounds. That is mine by right, and until it´s paid, not only will Britain sink through the floor and continue to sink and sink, but also your own lives will continue to worsen. You can´t spite me by letting the country rot and withdrawing to retire on your ill-gotten gains. I am telling you that it is much better to pay me now, and quickly, to minimize your own personal suffering. I shouldn´t have had to write this! You looked the other way for seven months. You should have told the public. Not live a lie! Now look what I´ve done! Your television programmes are rubbish. Your television channels are rubbish. Your newspapers are rubbish. Your government is rubbish. Your art is rubbish. Your music is rubbish. And because you looked the other way, and told yourselves I didn´t exist or would go away, you must think that you are rubbish.



[link to pages.123-reg.co.uk]