NASA Caught Doctoring SOHO Images - Red Handed!

A very active thread on the Pole Shift ning resulted, where these 1999 images were examined. What was discovered was obvious signs of doctoring in the 1999 images. Checking the NASA archives for SOHO, it was discovered that even the official archives have these doctored SOHO images, an inside job! The doctoring, a cut-and-paste job, showed up in many different analyses. One analysis was to note the smeared appearance, which does not appear on C3 images that are legit and untouched. In fact, the doctored appearance on the image posted on the German debunker site has a DIFFERENT appearance than the doctored appearance on the NASA archives for SOHO. Note also the dark blue area under the paste, which is not consistent with the sunrays coming from the Sun.

IMAGE: August 15, 1999 17:18 Doctored [link to www.zetatalk.com]
IMAGE: March 27, 2009 3:18 Comparison [link to www.zetatalk.com]

Another approach used to identify that the 1999 images were doctored was to color enhance. The pasted material emerged with a different blue background on the doctored C3 SOHO image than the surrounding area, but in fact has the same appearance that the pasted date that all SOHO images contained.

I did an enhancement from one of the posted images dated 1999/08/15. The grouping around the main body from 1999 shows a different pattern grouping of material than the pattern grouping of material of analysis of current SOHO images of Planet X that I've enhanced. The enhancement that I used to show the grouping pattern of PX came from a blog entitled "Lasco C2 Frame 2010/01/22 11:54". The enhanced picture shown is Lasco C2 Frame 2010/01/22 11:54.

IMAGE: Color Enhanced [link to www.zetatalk.com]

loony

Doctored SOHO C2 images likewise showed the smeary effect, when the colors were reversed. Plus the C2 image on the German site for August 15, 1999 2:30 was again DIFFERENT from that drawn from the SOHO archives maintained by NASA. For comparison, a SOHO C2 image for January 21, 2010 at 7:31 show what a color reversal on a non-doctored image looks like.

IMAGE: Color Reversed [link to www.zetatalk.com]
IMAGE: Nondoctored Reversal [link to www.zetatalk.com]

The Zetas have long maintained that SOHO Images were being airbrushed to hide the presence of Planet X, but this airbrushing takes place prior to the final image capture, before the images are made available to the public. Nevertheless, this attempt to hide the presence of Planet X had been noticed,
[link to www.youtube.com]
as vertical edit lines would appear, and one observer caught that Saturn disappeared from a frame, then reappeared last December 4, 2009.

IMAGE: Saturn Disappears [link to www.zetatalk.com]

fruitbat

The airbrushing of SOHO images was implied when Planet X would only show up sporadically.

Hello, I would like to know why in SOHO's photos we can see Planet X just only in one image? [link to sohowww.nascom.nasa.gov] Is it possible that NASA has missed such an image? If it is so, then why haven't they corrected their mistake and why hasn't this image been improved?

ZetaTalk Comment 6/20/2009:
[link to www.zetatalk.com]
Once the image is out, they fear to replace it as that would surely scream of a cover-up. We have mentioned in the past that there are computer programs in place that replace the location where Planet X is expected to be with something normal. Each image is quickly set right, in this way, in time to provide it to the public in the timely manner they have come to expect. But Planet X is not always where the computer programs expect it to be. It is not so much that Planet X itself moves, and quickly, but that the satellite taking images moves. There are many particle flows bombarding the area of Earth at this time, most unknown to man, and satellites far out in space move aside or are attracted. Those monitoring SOHO images are also distracted, some despondent about the cover-up, and miss these exceptions in any audits they do until it is too late. If out in the public, or feared out in the public, then best left alone, is the logic.

NASA’s recent reaction to the frequent appearance of Planet X on SOHO has been downtime, and no comment.

SOHO C3 was down from 12/07 15:18 to 12/09 00:18, close to 36 hours with no explanation. SOHO C2 was down from 12/07 15:08 to 12/09 00:06 also. SOHO EIT's (closeup of sun surface) were not down at all, so it was not the satellite. Stereo COR1 and COR2 did not have down time either.


ZetaTalk Comment 12/12/2009:
[link to www.zetatalk.com]
The downtime was due to consternation at NASA and JPL over what to say about the continuing appearance of the Planet X complex on the various satellites maintained by the US and its partners. When Planet X blundered into the SOHO red image on December 23, 2007, replete with streaming tail, the establishment decided to pretend it never happened and ignore it. Since many copies of this appearance of Planet X were out and about on the Internet, to withdraw or airbrush that image would imply a cover-up. So they ignored it. But in 2009 these accidents kept coming, with increasing frequency, starting on March 21, 2009 with the dramatic appearance of the Winged Globe. Then the Stereo Ahead showed Planet X as the Red Cross of yor on December 4-5, 2009. Of course, the many spies out and about on the Internet reported that this too was a flaming subject, another example of how their airbrush programs are failing to keep pace with the bobbling about that the satellites, the Earth, and Planet X are doing these days. Their choices were few - shut down the SOHO and Stereo service, improve the airbrushing programs, or continue to ignore the occasional appearance of Planet X. After heated discussion in smoke filled rooms, the decision was to continue to live with the status quo.

But for outright doctoring of the SOHO images on the NASA archives is new. What does this mean?

ZetaTalk Prediction 1/25/2010:
[link to www.zetatalk.com]
In the past month, those at NASA have been almost frantic about the appearance of Planet X on their SOHO images. The decision to simply ignore this, or to assert that the WISE scan has picked up an increasing number of asteroids in the area, has seemed too light a response. Certainly the argument could be made, as it was on the German site, that asteroids never looked like this in the past, with a drifting tail and wings. Those at NASA fear their participation in the cover-up will be revealed, and as the arm of the US government responsible for monitoring space, they would be the likely scapegoats. Angry mobs at their gates, an inability to go home, and no place to run as it is not yet time to dash to the bunkers. Gripped by fear, some at NASA made stupid decisions, allowing the SOHO archives to be doctored, or should we say allowing doctored images to replace the original. The plan was to get the buzz on the Internet in their favor, that what is being interpreted to be Planet X on SOHO images lately have been around a long time, thus are likely some sort of asteroid swarm. Rather than go to message boards Nancy frequents, they took a side path, posting these on a German site. What was not expected was how quickly the obvious doctoring would be identified, so quickly that the asteroid swarm excuse could not take hold. What now? They will attempt to utilize the media, claiming that any electromagnetic interference is due to the mild activity of the Sun, and hammering the story that asteroids newly discovered by their WISE probe are swarming about. By this, they hope that those in the populace who can be led like sheep will dismiss any Internet buzz that asserts otherwise. This is not a wise move on the part of NASA, however, as other evidence of Planet X and its vast tail have already been noted - such as the Norway swirl, neon clouds, and the recent Australian radar circles. We have hinted that there are MORE things pending, which will discombobulate the establishment and put rips in the cover-up. By layering lie upon lie, those in NASA will only compound the rage that the public will visit upon them when the truth is finally out.

Last Edited by Nancy Lieder on 01/25/2010 02:05 PM

dipshit quackhead

Yeah, have you even LOOKED at the images? Go check it out yourself, you BLIND idiot!

Grow-up. Are you 5 yrs. old?

nice catch nancy

Drolling idiot!

Me an idiot?

Fuck that's a classic....

ignore haters nancy......they are brainwashed christards.

Do you like dogs?

fried not broiled

Utter anbd complete nonsense.

Nice to see Nancy hasn't changed a bit.

Nice one Nancy! Did you check out those spheres that started showing up on the recent ahead and behind images? They seem to be doctoring those shot too!!

Yo Nance -- better get your boy Melfy to post this on the debunker boycott thread, STAT!

Great info Nancy! You should post here more often.

Have you? Remember when a picture you claimed was "Planet X" and its "moon swirls" turned out to be a flying kite?

Listen bozo, go LOOK at the doctored images! LOOK at them. Take the link. NASA has allowed the SOHO archives to be doctored. That's how desperate they are to hide evidence of Planet X these days!

Note: CB does not know how to look, and beyond that, does not have the brain cells to process what a doctored image looks like.

What GLP thread is that?

Why haven't you bothered to have your imaging team take recent updated photos of "Planet X" hovering near the sun?

Notice how Nancy responds with hostility and insults. That's all she has.

Yes, another poster started calling her names, but I did not. I simply asked if she remembered how she claimed a photo of "Planet X" turned out to actually be a flying kite. If she couldn't tell the difference then, how do we know these photos are actually "Planet X?" In addition, how can images from 1999 be "Planet X" near the sun when "Planet X" didn't supposedly arrive until 2003? How is it that "Planet X" has been photographed by SOHO numerous times, all near the sun, for 10 years? Why is it the government, who is supposedly covering up any sign of "Planet X", continuously forgets to remove any trace of it from SOHO?

I suspect she'll be paging her attack dog User now.

Last Edited by Circuit Breaker on 01/25/2010 02:46 PM

Not surprised! Stereo Ahead has been showing the Planet X as a Red Cross for the past couple months. Now the Moon swirls are showing up as 'earth sized' objects on Stereo Behind. Well, realize that the Moon Swirls are between the Earth and Sun, and not that large, but that close to Earth to appear that way!

Utter head in the sands, cannot look as it scares me, denial stupidity!

Wow, an admission from Nancy that looking scares her.

[link to 204.74.214.194]

We're all over this one, come over and join us.



Last Edited by DanfromtheHills on 01/25/2010 02:47 PM