Spots around sun could be iron vomited by the sun | |
Dupier (OP) User ID: 874045 United States 01/26/2010 02:23 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Here's something that will make your beak wiggle... Suppose you focus in on the complex structures of the Sun's corona and the massive limb-like flares that are constantly exploding from it's surface.... The loopy flare structure is just plasma aligning itself to the magnetic fields affecting it. So realistically anything as close as those spot are to the sun would be experiencing a shit ton of magnetic force, duh. So here's the kicker, once magnetised, and take into account this is no small force, it's the fucking sun at point blank range, these objects are NOT going to be traveling in the a straight line.... GET IT? They could be skipping across the surface or hell for all we know it could be passing right through the sun itself. another thing to take into account, that i dont want to bother making another post about, is just one "objectozoidsthinga ma jigss" in such proximity to the sun would be vibrated from radiant EM waves to the point that it would shine as brightly as the stars behind it etc etc, you get the idea. ^^ explains your non-transient pixel whatever the hell shit -Dupier -Dupier |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 867576 United States 01/26/2010 02:28 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Aleilius User ID: 817850 United States 01/26/2010 02:29 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | It is an interesting theory, but I'm afraid the iron would be vaporized by the heat of the sun. I believe they are electrons, and the sun itself is the nucleus. It's a macro-atom of sorts. Last Edited by Aleilius on 01/26/2010 02:29 AM |
Dupier (OP) User ID: 874045 United States 01/26/2010 02:56 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | It is an interesting theory, but I'm afraid the iron would be vaporized by the heat of the sun. Quoting: AleiliusI believe they are electrons, and the sun itself is the nucleus. It's a macro-atom of sorts. Open your mind sir, your thinking is too box shaped right now. [link to www.thesurfaceofthesun.com] Quote from video at the top right of the page.... "This is an example of a "running difference" image of the sun's surface revealed by the TRACE satellite using its 171 angstrom filter. This filter is specifically sensitive to iron ion (FE IX/X) emissions and records a C3.3 flare and mass ejection in AR 9143 in 171Å on 28 Aug. 2000. The flare activity is caused by increased electrical activity as fast moving plasma sweeps over surface ridges, resulting in increased electrical activity on the windward side of the mountain ranges." and "These 21st century satellites and technologies now enable us to peer behind the outer plasma layers of the chromosphere and photosphere and allow us to study the rocky, calcium ferrite transitional layer with incredible precision." calcium ferrite is essentially iron combined with calcium. If you dont care to read or click links or whatever, it essentially details a layer of liquid/plasma iron that is sitting below the photosphere... so much for it being vaporized.... AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH -Dupier -Dupier |
Dupier (OP) User ID: 874045 United States 01/26/2010 03:17 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 874045 United States 01/26/2010 04:28 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 817850 United States 01/26/2010 04:32 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | It is an interesting theory, but I'm afraid the iron would be vaporized by the heat of the sun. Quoting: DupierI believe they are electrons, and the sun itself is the nucleus. It's a macro-atom of sorts. Open your mind sir, your thinking is too box shaped right now. [link to www.thesurfaceofthesun.com] Quote from video at the top right of the page.... "This is an example of a "running difference" image of the sun's surface revealed by the TRACE satellite using its 171 angstrom filter. This filter is specifically sensitive to iron ion (FE IX/X) emissions and records a C3.3 flare and mass ejection in AR 9143 in 171Å on 28 Aug. 2000. The flare activity is caused by increased electrical activity as fast moving plasma sweeps over surface ridges, resulting in increased electrical activity on the windward side of the mountain ranges." and "These 21st century satellites and technologies now enable us to peer behind the outer plasma layers of the chromosphere and photosphere and allow us to study the rocky, calcium ferrite transitional layer with incredible precision." calcium ferrite is essentially iron combined with calcium. If you dont care to read or click links or whatever, it essentially details a layer of liquid/plasma iron that is sitting below the photosphere... so much for it being vaporized.... AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH -Dupier Sir, my mind is already open. You said iron, not calcium ferrite. There is a big difference. |
Aleilius User ID: 817850 United States 01/26/2010 04:35 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | It is an interesting theory, but I'm afraid the iron would be vaporized by the heat of the sun. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 817850I believe they are electrons, and the sun itself is the nucleus. It's a macro-atom of sorts. Open your mind sir, your thinking is too box shaped right now. [link to www.thesurfaceofthesun.com] Quote from video at the top right of the page.... "This is an example of a "running difference" image of the sun's surface revealed by the TRACE satellite using its 171 angstrom filter. This filter is specifically sensitive to iron ion (FE IX/X) emissions and records a C3.3 flare and mass ejection in AR 9143 in 171Å on 28 Aug. 2000. The flare activity is caused by increased electrical activity as fast moving plasma sweeps over surface ridges, resulting in increased electrical activity on the windward side of the mountain ranges." and "These 21st century satellites and technologies now enable us to peer behind the outer plasma layers of the chromosphere and photosphere and allow us to study the rocky, calcium ferrite transitional layer with incredible precision." calcium ferrite is essentially iron combined with calcium. If you dont care to read or click links or whatever, it essentially details a layer of liquid/plasma iron that is sitting below the photosphere... so much for it being vaporized.... AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH -Dupier Sir, my mind is already open. You said iron, not calcium ferrite. There is a big difference. Oh, and is there any suggestion to say that this calcium ferrite is not replenished as it's vaporized? There's no reason to suggest that it's static. |
Aleilius User ID: 817850 United States 01/26/2010 04:37 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | It is an interesting theory, but I'm afraid the iron would be vaporized by the heat of the sun. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 817850I believe they are electrons, and the sun itself is the nucleus. It's a macro-atom of sorts. Open your mind sir, your thinking is too box shaped right now. [link to www.thesurfaceofthesun.com] Quote from video at the top right of the page.... "This is an example of a "running difference" image of the sun's surface revealed by the TRACE satellite using its 171 angstrom filter. This filter is specifically sensitive to iron ion (FE IX/X) emissions and records a C3.3 flare and mass ejection in AR 9143 in 171Å on 28 Aug. 2000. The flare activity is caused by increased electrical activity as fast moving plasma sweeps over surface ridges, resulting in increased electrical activity on the windward side of the mountain ranges." and "These 21st century satellites and technologies now enable us to peer behind the outer plasma layers of the chromosphere and photosphere and allow us to study the rocky, calcium ferrite transitional layer with incredible precision." calcium ferrite is essentially iron combined with calcium. If you dont care to read or click links or whatever, it essentially details a layer of liquid/plasma iron that is sitting below the photosphere... so much for it being vaporized.... AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH -Dupier Sir, my mind is already open. You said iron, not calcium ferrite. There is a big difference. I quote from your original post: ".... could these spheres actually be iron spued from the sun? The iron would likely form inside the star then become ejected due chaotic nature of the surface of the sun. These iron pieces would become incredibly magnetised and thus attract to each other....." This says it all. Please do not try to change the story on me, and please do not talk down to me like I have no idea what I'm talking about. |
Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 874045 United States 01/26/2010 04:43 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | you gotta follow the rabbit all the way down the god damn hole... you can't pussy foot in days like these. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 750924 United States 01/26/2010 04:43 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 874045 United States 01/26/2010 04:51 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Sir, my mind is already open. You said iron, not calcium ferrite. There is a big difference. Quoting: AleiliusOh, and is there any suggestion to say that this calcium ferrite is not replenished as it's vaporized? There's no reason to suggest that it's static. I certaintly think this would have to be the case, the sun is massive so i assume if it's producing any iron at all, it's going to be in massive quantities. Surely the magnetic fields will govern the characterisitcs of these iron deposits which will yeild weird and hard to explain results. For instance, I fairly certain that such environment would produce the phenomenon known as superconductors. again this is all just a thought |
Dupier (OP) User ID: 874045 United States 01/26/2010 04:53 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Sir, my mind is already open. You said iron, not calcium ferrite. There is a big difference. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 874045Oh, and is there any suggestion to say that this calcium ferrite is not replenished as it's vaporized? There's no reason to suggest that it's static. I certaintly think this would have to be the case, the sun is massive so i assume if it's producing any iron at all, it's going to be in massive quantities. Surely the magnetic fields will govern the characterisitcs of these iron deposits which will yeild weird and hard to explain results. For instance, I fairly certain that such environment would produce the phenomenon known as superconductors. again this is all just a thought *Sorry still getting set up on both computers Last Edited by Dupier on 01/26/2010 04:53 AM -Dupier |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 534125 United States 01/26/2010 06:19 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I found an iron meteorite in my driveway. I doubt it landed there but amazing nonetheless. I guess they are pretty rare and I have not had anyone knowledgeable take a look at it. It's about an inch in diameter and to think it could of come from the sun just blows me away. what an amazing universe we live in |
Dupier (OP) User ID: 874045 United States 01/26/2010 04:13 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 508527 United States 01/26/2010 04:21 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Dupier (OP) User ID: 874045 United States 01/26/2010 04:31 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Hahaha i dreamt about that last night, what if the tales about the gods actually had some merit to it. Like ancient civilizations witnessing the birth of mercury or venus etc etc, I mean you REALLY think man has clairvoyance to accurately predict the age of anything? Especially when trying to study something that no man has ever set foot, that we know of. Realllllly makes you think right? -Dupier |
Dupier (OP) User ID: 874045 United States 01/26/2010 11:42 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 874278 United States 01/27/2010 12:14 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Fallenmonk User ID: 765968 United Kingdom 01/27/2010 12:23 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 874187 United States 01/27/2010 12:28 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Nyhee7 User ID: 872702 United States 01/27/2010 12:47 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Dupier (OP) User ID: 874045 United States 01/27/2010 12:57 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | So one of those iron balls the size of a planet could be flung out into the path of Earth and get caught in Earths gravitational pull ?. Quoting: FallenmonkSomething the size of a planet would probably have a hard escaping the sun's grasp, however small chunk sized pieces would commonly experience such an event. I feel this explains all the meteorites and crap falling into the atomosphere lately, dont ya think? -Dupier |
Anonymous Coward 01/27/2010 12:57 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward 01/27/2010 12:58 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | So one of those iron balls the size of a planet could be flung out into the path of Earth and get caught in Earths gravitational pull ?. Quoting: DupierSomething the size of a planet would probably have a hard escaping the sun's grasp, however small chunk sized pieces would commonly experience such an event. I feel this explains all the meteorites and crap falling into the atomosphere lately, dont ya think? Ok, I'm freaked out again. YOU ASSHOLES! |
Dupier (OP) User ID: 874045 United States 01/27/2010 01:01 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Can Iron of any kind be magnetic at such high temperatures? I thought that heat ruined a magnet's magnetism? Quoting: Nyhee7I beg to differ with evidence of the sun and it's magnetic nature. You have to take into account the pressures at that present on the sun, it causes some strange things to happen. eariler i posted a link refering to a ionized layer of iron on the surface the sun. Wether or not this layer produces its own magnetic field, its hard to say considering it's pratically inside the sun itself. -Dupier |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 875191 Australia 01/27/2010 01:04 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Dupier (OP) User ID: 874045 United States 01/27/2010 01:08 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Much of our knowledge our stars comes from observing the lights in the sky around us, such as their life cycles and their sporadic deaths. However more intimate details such as the formation of planets has never really been witnessed..... would be intriguing if we were witnessing such an event from our very own sun. -Dupier |
Fallenmonk User ID: 867215 United Kingdom 01/27/2010 05:52 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Patrick Bateman User ID: 858763 United States 01/27/2010 05:54 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |