9/11 and laser guided planes | |
Dupier (OP) User ID: 874045 United States 02/13/2010 08:20 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Dupier (OP) User ID: 874045 United States 02/13/2010 08:29 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Dupier (OP) User ID: 874045 United States 02/13/2010 08:57 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Dupier (OP) User ID: 874045 United States 02/14/2010 03:25 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Lovearth User ID: 890761 United States 02/14/2010 03:33 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | there arent many truth seekers left on the forums side of this website, BUT if you come into chat and listen, you will surely find them there. DOOM DIED, everyone knows this, Truth is in the CHAT! Come FIND IT with us! Easier to discern legitimacy when it comes from the VOICE, not from text alone! its OPEN MIC 24/7, how can you deny that? |
Lovearth User ID: 890761 United States 02/14/2010 03:34 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | wow.... really.... Quoting: Dupierthis is video is proof more concrete than ANY OTHER piece of evidence out there. PERIOD and every person I show this is to has the same null response. Good job people, keep up the good .. work! That it IS, and im afraid it will get ignored... |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 633240 United States 02/14/2010 03:38 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | It's just a piece of white office paper fluttering in the air. Notice the smoke from the towers goes right over the camera person because of the direction of the breeze. Tons of office papers was expelled from the North Tower exploding. The white paper in the video is closer to the camera than the South Tower. In the extended version of that clip, you see the camera person filming some of the white office paper landing all around her. |
Dupier (OP) User ID: 874045 United States 02/14/2010 03:47 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | It's just a piece of white office paper fluttering in the air. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 633240Notice the smoke from the towers goes right over the camera person because of the direction of the breeze. Tons of office papers was expelled from the North Tower exploding. The white paper in the video is closer to the camera than the South Tower. In the extended version of that clip, you see the camera person filming some of the white office paper landing all around her. Originally i thought the same, but if you see a higher resolution version of the tape, you will notice that the bright dot follows the contour of the expanding fireball that erupts from the building, then disappears. It then reappears on the side of the adjacent building, moving a constant speed across it's surface. Only thing i know that acts like that is a light beam, think of when you shine a flashlight into a cloud of smoke just above a fire. If it had been a piece of paper, 1.) its fucking gigantic 2.) if it was in the close of proximity to the tower, when the plane crashed into it, the paper's trajectory would have been altered from the blast wave. -Dupier |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 633240 United States 02/14/2010 03:52 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | If it had been a piece of paper, Quoting: Dupier1.) its fucking gigantic 2.) if it was in the close of proximity to the tower, when the plane crashed into it, the paper's trajectory would have been altered from the blast wave. Like I said, the piece of paper was closer to the camera person, not the tower. At the end of her video clip, she's videotaping all the white paper fallen down and around her. If it was a laser, why do none of the other video of the 2nd plane impacting show this "white laser dot"? It's because the piece of paper was close to the camera person right in front of her angle. |
Dupier (OP) User ID: 874045 United States 02/14/2010 04:08 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Shit this guy just covered everything i said in a nice neat little video. To answer your question as to why no other camera showed the laser it because it was infrared light. Luckily one person was rich enough to own a camera able to capture infrared light Do you see now? Are you done being fucking retarded? -Dupier |
Dupier (OP) User ID: 874045 United States 02/14/2010 04:28 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 890808 Portugal 02/14/2010 05:29 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | If it had been a piece of paper, Quoting: Anonymous Coward 6332401.) its fucking gigantic 2.) if it was in the close of proximity to the tower, when the plane crashed into it, the paper's trajectory would have been altered from the blast wave. Like I said, the piece of paper was closer to the camera person, not the tower. At the end of her video clip, she's videotaping all the white paper fallen down and around her. If it was a laser, why do none of the other video of the 2nd plane impacting show this "white laser dot"? It's because the piece of paper was close to the camera person right in front of her angle. dude, stfu. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 890791 United States 02/14/2010 05:36 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Good god. SHUT THE FUCK UP. Nobody gives shit. It could have been a mere reflection off a window, could have been a reflection off debri from the other building, hell it could have even been added to the video after it was shot to make people like YOU look like a fucking fool. You are not helping the 9/11 movement. You are making everyone involved look like fucking idiots. Now, I will repeat. SHUT THE FUCK UP! NOBODY GIVES A FUCK WHAT YOU HAVE TO SAY OR WHAT 'EVIDENCE' YOU HAVE. NOW GO TAKE YOUR MEDS AND GO TO BED FUCKTARD. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 803157 United States 02/14/2010 05:48 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I'd love to hear other's opinions but apparently everyone is too......... Quoting: Dupierdumb 911/WTC was an INSIDE JOB. The technology to fly by wire on, particularly, laser command, had been around at least 10 years prior to 2001. You have to be a moron not to understand 911/WTC as an inside job of the CFR for their blessed NWO. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 803157 United States 02/14/2010 05:49 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Good god. SHUT THE FUCK UP. Nobody gives shit. It could have been a mere reflection off a window, could have been a reflection off debri from the other building, hell it could have even been added to the video after it was shot to make people like YOU look like a fucking fool. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 890791You are not helping the 9/11 movement. You are making everyone involved look like fucking idiots. Now, I will repeat. SHUT THE FUCK UP! NOBODY GIVES A FUCK WHAT YOU HAVE TO SAY OR WHAT 'EVIDENCE' YOU HAVE. NOW GO TAKE YOUR MEDS AND GO TO BED FUCKTARD. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 890791 United States 02/14/2010 05:51 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 803157 United States 02/14/2010 06:00 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Go fuck yourself. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 890791I'm a 20 year old high school graduate that has more common sense than your entire gene pool has. If you honestly believe laser guided planes were used, you are a fucking idiot. You are a shill; brainwashed by the propaganda. Or, perhaps you are just a moron. I had better hopes for your future. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 633240 United States 02/14/2010 06:01 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | [link to video.google.com] Quoting: DupierShit this guy just covered everything i said in a nice neat little video. To answer your question as to why no other camera showed the laser it because it was infrared light. Luckily one person was rich enough to own a camera able to capture infrared light Do you see now? Are you done being fucking retarded? You think a fluttering piece of white office paper that came out of the north tower 15 minutes before the 2nd hit is a laser dot guiding in a drone 767, hoping the person holding the laser gun to the south tower doesn't make a 570 mph plane miss the building and you are calling me fucking retarded?! Pal, go rent the documentary that original video clip came from, Seven Days in September. It's a piece of white office paper clear as day. You can even see the paper against the sky before it's in front of the south tower. You can also see the paper floating in front of the fireball after the crash in a downward motion because guess what? Gravity was pulling the piece of paper down. Paper even showered down on the camera person. Stop with this laser dot nonsense. It's misinformation. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 878570 United States 02/14/2010 06:10 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 878570 United States 02/14/2010 06:25 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ah..sorry but, that is debris passing in front of the building, not a laser target. you can actually follow it's path after the plane hits. it's obvious. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 878570although i do believe there is much more to 9/11 then we know. sorry dude , that is not a laser. also. they would not have to place a target there to hit the building, and, the camera may be infrared equipped , but it was not enabled. everything would be in black and white or a grayish green. not in full color like that. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 890837 United Kingdom 02/14/2010 06:30 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 878570 United States 02/14/2010 06:33 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Laser guided or remote controlled or both. It's plausible. At least you're not saying no planes hit the towers. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 890837One things for sure, the planes weren't hijacked by the Arabs alleged to have done so. Not when many of them turned up alive and well afterwards. oh planes hit the towers alright. It's who was behind it all is the real cause to seek truth. And one day, the truth will come out. I hope I live to see it. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 757124 United States 02/14/2010 06:33 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | It's just a piece of white office paper fluttering in the air. Quoting: DupierNotice the smoke from the towers goes right over the camera person because of the direction of the breeze. Tons of office papers was expelled from the North Tower exploding. The white paper in the video is closer to the camera than the South Tower. In the extended version of that clip, you see the camera person filming some of the white office paper landing all around her. Originally i thought the same, but if you see a higher resolution version of the tape, you will notice that the bright dot follows the contour of the expanding fireball that erupts from the building, then disappears. It then reappears on the side of the adjacent building, moving a constant speed across it's surface. Only thing i know that acts like that is a light beam, think of when you shine a flashlight into a cloud of smoke just above a fire. If it had been a piece of paper, 1.) its fucking gigantic 2.) if it was in the close of proximity to the tower, when the plane crashed into it, the paper's trajectory would have been altered from the blast wave. Why don't you provide a link to this higher resolution video? I'm talking the original video. It's very easy to edit this stuff nowadays. They teach high school kids how to digitally edit video. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 757124 United States 02/14/2010 06:35 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Dupier (OP) User ID: 874045 United States 02/14/2010 06:45 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | [link to video.google.com] Quoting: Anonymous Coward 633240Shit this guy just covered everything i said in a nice neat little video. To answer your question as to why no other camera showed the laser it because it was infrared light. Luckily one person was rich enough to own a camera able to capture infrared light Do you see now? Are you done being fucking retarded? You think a fluttering piece of white office paper that came out of the north tower 15 minutes before the 2nd hit is a laser dot guiding in a drone 767, hoping the person holding the laser gun to the south tower doesn't make a 570 mph plane miss the building and you are calling me fucking retarded?! Pal, go rent the documentary that original video clip came from, Seven Days in September. It's a piece of white office paper clear as day. You can even see the paper against the sky before it's in front of the south tower. You can also see the paper floating in front of the fireball after the crash in a downward motion because guess what? Gravity was pulling the piece of paper down. Paper even showered down on the camera person. Stop with this laser dot nonsense. It's misinformation. it's cool, i understand now. Some people are just unable to comprehend things tha are highly complex. I will cease in trying to convince you because it just physically impossible in this arena, but boy if we were talking face to face, I'd show you how foolish you truly are. For everyone else, are you serious? Did you not watch the video i post from google? the god damned laser is filmed grazing the smoke from WTC and the side of the copper pyramid topped building at the same time..... making an angle that would indicate a source of an inclined altitude, like something flying in the sky..... like a plane. oh weird how that happens to be the case. I just don't understand how you could possibly discern this as just mere debris "floating" along in such a peculiar manner. I mean let's get real here for a second. Does this video disturb you? I mean WHAT CONVINCES you so concretely to believe that it's a piece of white paper floating in air? To let you know, this video is exactly what it would look like if an infra red laser was projected from a jet in the sky onto a skyscraper with clouds of smoke around it, precise to the fucking T. Does that not ring an alarm within you? I mean any other piece of evidence for 9/11 being a set up is pretty weak compared to this, yet you are so quick to turn it down with such a simple explanation. I ask you what are your motives when you dont even attempt to rebute my evidence with proper mannerism? Last Edited by Dupier on 02/14/2010 07:02 AM -Dupier |
Dupier (OP) User ID: 874045 United States 02/14/2010 06:48 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | OP basically debunks himself. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 757124He claims this object is proof of a laser. LOOK A THE FUCKING SIZE OF THAT LASER MARK. It's HUGE. There is not a targeting system in the world that requires a laser mark that large. FAIL. It's paper. ever use a laser pointer? you know when you shine it at a wall from 50 feet away, the dot projected on the wall appears greater in size..... need i explain anymore? -Dupier |
Dupier (OP) User ID: 874045 United States 02/14/2010 06:53 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | It's just a piece of white office paper fluttering in the air. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 757124Notice the smoke from the towers goes right over the camera person because of the direction of the breeze. Tons of office papers was expelled from the North Tower exploding. The white paper in the video is closer to the camera than the South Tower. In the extended version of that clip, you see the camera person filming some of the white office paper landing all around her. Originally i thought the same, but if you see a higher resolution version of the tape, you will notice that the bright dot follows the contour of the expanding fireball that erupts from the building, then disappears. It then reappears on the side of the adjacent building, moving a constant speed across it's surface. Only thing i know that acts like that is a light beam, think of when you shine a flashlight into a cloud of smoke just above a fire. If it had been a piece of paper, 1.) its fucking gigantic 2.) if it was in the close of proximity to the tower, when the plane crashed into it, the paper's trajectory would have been altered from the blast wave. Why don't you provide a link to this higher resolution video? I'm talking the original video. It's very easy to edit this stuff nowadays. They teach high school kids how to digitally edit video. I will look feverently for it, I found it awhile back when i was first digging through all the documentaries about 9/11. I don't dwell much on this topic these days, but lately something stirred it up in me again. Regardless, once i find it, it will satisfy your doubts. -Dupier |
Dupier (OP) User ID: 874045 United States 02/14/2010 07:00 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Good god. SHUT THE FUCK UP. Nobody gives shit. It could have been a mere reflection off a window, could have been a reflection off debri from the other building, hell it could have even been added to the video after it was shot to make people like YOU look like a fucking fool. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 890791You are not helping the 9/11 movement. You are making everyone involved look like fucking idiots. Now, I will repeat. SHUT THE FUCK UP! NOBODY GIVES A FUCK WHAT YOU HAVE TO SAY OR WHAT 'EVIDENCE' YOU HAVE. NOW GO TAKE YOUR MEDS AND GO TO BED FUCKTARD. I'm curious, what are you in life? A doctor? a lawyer? a teacher? that kind of thing. I'm curious as to why you think this is the case. I mean why are you here? What was it in life that brought to come to a conspiracy website at a rediculous hour of the day? Let alone post messages on a board..... Why do you not examine every piece of evidence presented to you before disregarding it? -Dupier |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 891133 India 02/14/2010 02:40 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I ask you what are your motives when you dont even attempt to rebute my evidence with proper mannerism? Quoting: DupierBecause it is NOT evidence. It's you watching a video and claiming the same shit as the other guy is without any evidence to back up your claims. Have you seen a higher resolution video? Taken the time to blow up the video and maybe see what it is? No? Then shut the fuck up. You have no evidence of 'laser guided planes' and you never will. |
Dupier (OP) User ID: 874045 United States 02/14/2010 05:20 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | [link to thecameraplanetarchive.magnify.net] It's the best resolution i can find now, but i will find the original. All i have been able to gather is that the author's name is Jen S.. The video above shows the scene pretty clearly, but the video has been cropped and there's obvious editing of the timeline of it as well. However you can clearly see that the object, is not a piece of paper. There are several points of time where the dot can be seen passing through the smoke like it were a liquid, creating a cylinder of light. You can also clearly see the dot follow along the edge of the expanding fireball from the plane crash. If you record it's path across the fireball you will notice, it does not follow a straight line. In fact it moves all over the place, disappearing and reappearing at different angles and elevations etc. Again if you think this is a piece of paper, how is it possible for it to demonstrate such strange characteristics? ALSO ALLOW ME TO ADDRESS THE FACT THAT YOU THINK THIS IS NOT EVIDENCE...... ARE YOU D U M B? WHAT ELSE could be used as evidence fuck face? VIDEO IS THE BEST THING WE HAVE in this situation. Are you trying to tell me that HEARSAY from some random person is better? Or would you rather take the evidence provided by the government? Or is the only acceptable evidence for you involve scientific studies and analysis, guess what that doesnt exist. Please tell me what evidence looks like because apparently I'm confused. I hate you for making me ask you questions like this. -Dupier |