Fact is, no Paul=no christianity.
See the history of Europe and ask how long a few churches in asia would of lasted.
Quoting: Anonymous Coward 900128 Exactly. Paul is the father of the modern chuch and Christ is the head of the true church.
SO Paul is more important than Jesus?
No Paul = No Christianity?
What have you built this religion on?
WOW! you people sure just don't get it.
So that is why you can't let go of Paul.
You believe him to be more important than Jesus!Whilst I appreciate your honesty, I think you have admitted to far more than you realise here with two tiny posts.
Ever hear of a "necessary evil"?
Paul
completely perverted the Teaching of Jesus to the point that it resulted
directly in the Holocaust 1900 years later.
But I have
never denied that Paul's perversion of that Teaching was a
necessary evil.
Without Paul, few would ever even have heard of Jesus. Any attempt to convey the Teaching of Jesus undistilled to the idolators of the Roman empire would have failed
completely.
Some 2000 years later, understanding that the Doctrine of "resurrection" was taught by Jesus as a Doctrine of 'Rebirth'
still confronts the fundamental inclination of people towards
idolatry.
They prefer to worship Jesus as 'God' rather than to understand his Teaching; out of fear that they will go to
hell if they do not believe the teaching of Paul.
These Satanist Christians who simply
cannot abide the Truth about the Teaching of Jesus are, fundamentally,
NO different than the idolators to which the original followers of Jesus had to convey that Teaching.
But, now that there are hundreds of millions of followers of Paul, thinking that they are followers of Jesus, it should
finally be known--in fulfillment of the Prophecy in Chapter 12, verse 9 of the
Book of Daniel, that "these words will remain secret and sealed until the time of the End"--that Jesus taught a Doctrine of 'Rebirth'; no matter
how much the idolators
detest that Truth.
Michael
