|
REPORT COPYRIGHT VIOLATION IN REPLY
|
|
Message Subject
|
Was Paul - aka Saul of Tarsus - a False Apostle?
|
|
Poster Handle
|
Anonymous Coward |
|
Post Content
|
I understand your bitterness with the pauline exaltation and it is a resentmant I express myself against those who uphold Pauls reengineered epistles to create this new christianity. In Pauls defense I must say his writngs are very hard for the average person to understand and has been compromised by the churches and given to the congregation as the rock of christian belief..They changed little words here and there.There were times paul was addressing a specific law but when they translated made it look like all of the law.Just like they did with the word jew in the bible.
Paul never contradicted what jesus established,its the twisted doctrines of the CATHOLIC Seminaries that engineered this scheme to carry on with lawless type of JESUS.This curriculum was passed on the the daughters of the harlot
Quoting: Neim-Ya'shar Jesus established that whatever the Apostles got together and agreed upon would be decreed so in heaven and on earth. When Barnabas and Paul came to the Apostles with the question about adult male circumcision they issued a written edict about that decision along with a short list of other concerns newly converted gentiles need to abide by. One of them happened to be to not eat meat that had been sacrificed to idols. Paul is on the record having stated no less than three times how it was perfectly okay to eat meat sacrificed to idols (although he declared he would not for sake of the conscious of his weaker minded brothers). what are you talking about where can you sacrifice meat to God when there is no temple?
|
|
|
Please verify you're human:
|
|
|
Reason for copyright violation:
|
