Obama = Chamberlain or Hitler?

It is clear the Arabs are taking their ques from Hitler:But one wonders is Obama taking his from Chamberlain or Hitler himself?



Arab League renews support for peace efforts?

The Arab League’s backing for a land-for-peace initiative with Israel came despite its firm opposition to Israeli plans for Jewish construction in east Jerusalem, land Palestinians claim as the capital of a future state.

[link to www.jweekly.com]

Now who is in the mood for a history lesson?

September 15, 1938: British Prime Minister Neville Chamberlain set out for Germany to visit Adolph Hitler. Hitler wasn't asking for too much... just the liberation of the German-speaking areas of Czechoslovakia [Sudetenland]. It was a sweet little "Land for Peace" deal that would hopefully appease the Fuhrer and give the German-speaking Czechs their "rights of self-determination"... albeit under Nazi control. Fifteen days later the Sudetenland was handed over to Hitler. In exchange, Hitler gives his word that he has no other territorial designs on Europe.

October 1, 1938: Germany now owns half of Czechoslovakia and not a single shot was fired. Before the year ended, Hitler broke his agreement and occupied the remainder of Czechoslovakia. The following year Hitler invaded Poland. He continued to invade most of Europe, Africa, Russia and even bombed Chamberlain's very own Britain. Needless to say, the duped Chamberlain was replaced rather quickly by Winston Churchill. The Brits had THEIR fill of "Land for Peace!"

[link to www.peacefaq.com]


That was 1938, lets go back to about 4 years ago, the last land for peace experiment...

The forced eviction by Israel of its settlers and military forces in entirety from the ground territory of the Gaza strip has been put forth as a 'test case' of "Land for Peace" with the Palestinians.

•This 'test case' is argued by some to show the failure of the "Land for Peace" strategy with the Palestinians:

Rockets launched against Israeli targets continued almost immediately after the Israeli withdrawal and have increased in the time since.

The attacks from the Gaza Strip are continuing today

The area is now being used to smuggle weapons into Israel

Tunnels are being built under the border for use in the smuggling of weapons and fighters

Is presumed that Hamas is the main organization behind the smuggling and tunnels, though other groups are likely involved as well

[link to www.absoluteastronomy.com]



What is crazy is seeing how split the Arabs are in their effort to play good cop bad cop.

Syria, Libya, Iran, are among the Palestinian Arabs who cling to the position of negotiating through resistance and war while not even acknowledging the sovereign state of Israel.

How can the Arabs who seemingly want the land for peace, speak for the Arabs who clearly have proven time and time again to wanting the land for war?

Israel is expected to negotiate with Arabs when they are so divided, and so insistant on not even acknowledging the reality of its sovereignty?


Enter Obama, is this guy negotiating between Israel and Palestine like Chamberlain was, or is he doing nothing more than acting as a representative of Palestinians who are not even at the negotiating table?

Obama is he not playing the role Hitler did for Germany when he came up with the proposal of land for peace?

At least Hitler gave his audiance a little credit by not being at war with the world, before insisting on the land for peace.

The Palestinians who are at war with Israel expect the land without any negotiations whatsoever, they are trying to terrorize Israel out of it, and Obama is doing nothing more than adding fuel to the fire by making Israel as the obstacle to peace.

Obama refusing to critisize the Palestine leaders who are insighting the Palestinian sheep to violance, ought to be a huge red flag.

Obama refusing to critisize the Palestinians for refusing to establish peace with their neighbors so there can be negotiations, ought to be a huge red flag.

Obamas' agenda to force Israel to conceade to the demands of the Palestinians, is a command rather than a negotiation. Obama is being a tyrant, thinking Israel ought to concead to the Palestinian leadership declaring genocide on Israel.

No negotiations can ever be considered with them by Israel until they prove they can live in peace with Israel. Until then Israel has no choice but to move on with its sovereign agenda.

Until Palestinians come peacibly to the negotiating table, how on earth can Obama justify himself in being critical to Israel who is waiting for Palestine to come in peace to the negotiating table?

You can't give concessions to someone who has proved to be a failure at keeping their end of the bargain time and time again.

Last Edited by Jagsbch on 04/01/2010 05:16 PM