Fox News Says Building 7 Was controlled demolition | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 942322 United States 04/25/2010 11:24 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 942322 United States 04/25/2010 11:36 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Governor Ventura and many 9/11 “Truthers” allege that government explosives caused the afternoon collapse of Building 7. This is false. I know this because I remember watching all 47 stories of Building 7 suddenly and silently crumble before my eyes. Silently? Only if he was watching this video...Which interestingly enough doesnt have sound Listen to the silence this turd claims he heard.. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 942322 United States 04/25/2010 11:38 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 942322 United States 04/25/2010 11:42 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Governor Ventura and many 9/11 “Truthers” allege that government explosives caused the afternoon collapse of Building 7. This is false. I know this because I remember watching all 47 stories of Building 7 suddenly and silently crumble before my eyes. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 942322Silently? Only if he was watching this video...Which interestingly enough doesnt have sound Listen to the silence this turd claims he heard.. This shows Fox News is in on a cover-up... A blatant lie by a "man on the scene", with video to debunk him with... |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 941746 Ireland 04/25/2010 11:56 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
teamster User ID: 878454 United States 04/25/2010 11:57 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I have always said that building 7 was a demo job. edit: and this article doesn't say that, but it's just to obvious....... Last Edited by teamster on 04/26/2010 12:18 AM . This is a must see video......This woman describes why we have, and should protect our second amendment. [link to video.google.com] . . Rights do not require government registration, certification, or approval, and are not subject to any form of taxation — otherwise they are not rights, they are privileges granted at the discretion of the government, controlled by the government, and revocable by the government. By Brian Puckett. [link to www.geoffmetcalf.com] |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 953064 United States 04/26/2010 12:00 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
TEXAS UNCENSORED, nli User ID: 515141 United States 04/26/2010 12:01 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 950720 Canada 04/26/2010 12:02 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 942322 United States 04/26/2010 12:04 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | FOX news showed they knew something incredibly relevant, hid it, now talk about it and 100% lie about it...That reporter definitely was nowhere near that building or he would have heard that MASSIVE explosion. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 923672 United States 04/26/2010 12:05 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 923672 United States 04/26/2010 12:06 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 905122 United States 04/26/2010 12:06 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 942322 United States 04/26/2010 12:07 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
teamster User ID: 878454 United States 04/26/2010 12:07 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | By Jeffrey Scott Shapiro Quoting: Anonymous Coward 938240- FOXNews.com Shortly before the building collapsed, several NYPD officers and Con-Edison workers told me that Larry Silverstein, the property developer of One World Financial Center was on the phone with his insurance carrier to see if they would authorize the controlled demolition of the building – since its foundation was already unstable and expected to fall. If I remember correctly, didn't another article say something about silverstein not being able to talk about this for days. It was already rigged. I've watched the clips of that building over and over and fire was not the only reason 7 came down. Anybody with half an ounce of logic can see that. . This is a must see video......This woman describes why we have, and should protect our second amendment. [link to video.google.com] . . Rights do not require government registration, certification, or approval, and are not subject to any form of taxation — otherwise they are not rights, they are privileges granted at the discretion of the government, controlled by the government, and revocable by the government. By Brian Puckett. [link to www.geoffmetcalf.com] |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 631597 Netherlands 04/26/2010 12:08 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Umm... FAIL? Did you stop reading the article right after finishing the paragraph you posted up here? Because the very next paragraph goes in to say: "While I was talking with a fellow reporter and several NYPD officers, Building 7 suddenly collapsed, and before it hit the ground, not a single sound emanated from the tower area. There were no explosives; I would have heard them. In fact, I remember that in those few seconds, as the building sank to the ground that I was stunned by how quiet it was." FOX News DOES NOT say it was a controlled demolition. The article quite plainly states that the author was there that day and DID NOT here any explosive charges. This is not proof of an admittance, but an obvious attempt to skew a report into saying something it most definitely does not say. I believe that something fishy happened on that day, and I believe tower 7 fell intentionally in a controlled demolition. But making false claims such as yours, and pinning this thread to the front page, does NOTHING BUT DAMAGE THE CREDIBILITY OF THOSE THAT TRULY SEEK ANSWERS!!!! |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 942322 United States 04/26/2010 12:10 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | By Jeffrey Scott Shapiro Quoting: teamster- FOXNews.com Shortly before the building collapsed, several NYPD officers and Con-Edison workers told me that Larry Silverstein, the property developer of One World Financial Center was on the phone with his insurance carrier to see if they would authorize the controlled demolition of the building – since its foundation was already unstable and expected to fall. If I remember correctly, didn't another article say something about silverstein not being able to talk about this for days. It was already rigged. I've watched the clips of that building over and over and fire was not the only reason 7 came down. Anybody with half an ounce of logic can see that. And it definitely doesnt look like the firefighters knew what was happening when that huge explosion goes off.. But according to this numbnut, firefighters were well aware of this... |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 932964 United States 04/26/2010 12:12 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
BROKEN User ID: 893303 United States 04/26/2010 12:12 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | In October 2001, I reported on a story for Gannett newspaper, The Journal News, that the FBI Joint Terrorist Task Force was investigating a Brooklyn high school student for predicting the collapse of the World Trade Center five days before it happened. To my surprise, the NYC Board of Education confirmed the story on the record and the FBI confirmed there had been rumors circulating in the New York City Arab-American community about a possible attack on Manhattan. My story was immediately confirmed by Newsweek Senior Editor Jonathan Alter, and after I penned a follow up in The Washington Times magazine, “Insight,” I was interviewed by Fox News’ Bill O’Reilly on “The O’Reilly Factor.” Hmmmmm.... "The individual is handicapped by coming face to face with a conspiracy so monstrous he cannot believe it exists." J. Edgar Hoover "Those who make Peaceful Revolution Impossible...Will make Violent Revolution Inevitable" -JFK :minimoran: |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 942322 United States 04/26/2010 12:13 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Umm... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 631597FAIL? Did you stop reading the article right after finishing the paragraph you posted up here? Because the very next paragraph goes in to say: "While I was talking with a fellow reporter and several NYPD officers, Building 7 suddenly collapsed, and before it hit the ground, not a single sound emanated from the tower area. There were no explosives; I would have heard them. In fact, I remember that in those few seconds, as the building sank to the ground that I was stunned by how quiet it was." FOX News DOES NOT say it was a controlled demolition. The article quite plainly states that the author was there that day and DID NOT here any explosive charges. This is not proof of an admittance, but an obvious attempt to skew a report into saying something it most definitely does not say. I believe that something fishy happened on that day, and I believe tower 7 fell intentionally in a controlled demolition. But making false claims such as yours, and pinning this thread to the front page, does NOTHING BUT DAMAGE THE CREDIBILITY OF THOSE THAT TRULY SEEK ANSWERS!!!! Oh really?? You are missing the point here... That FOX reporter just got caught in a huge lie...Period |
JF Priest User ID: 949374 United States 04/26/2010 12:15 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
JF Priest User ID: 949374 United States 04/26/2010 12:16 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 910644 United States 04/26/2010 12:17 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Useful RepEATER User ID: 924966 United States 04/26/2010 12:19 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Old news. Real Eyes, Realize, Real Lies..... Every normal man must be tempted, at times, to spit on his hands, hoist the black flag, and begin slitting throats. ~H. L. Mencken~ We can easily forgive a child who is afraid of the dark; the real tragedy of life is when men are afraid of the light. ~Plato~ When a well-packaged web of lies has been sold gradually to the masses over generations, the truth will seem utterly preposterous and its speaker a raving lunatic. ~Dresden James~ |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 942322 United States 04/26/2010 12:19 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 631597 Netherlands 04/26/2010 12:21 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Oh really?? Quoting: Anonymous Coward 942322You are missing the point here... That FOX reporter just got caught in a huge lie...Period No, I'm not missing the point you dipshit. I have seen the videos, and I know what happened on that day. I've had 9 years to study the damn incident and I have 24 hours worth of news broadcasts from 5 different media outlets recorded on that day to study from. I know what happened! I think YOU are missing the point of what I am saying. The title of the thread is: "Fox News Says Building 7 Was controlled demolition" Yet Fox News DOES NOT say it was a controlled demolition in that article! It clearly states that the author was there that day and heard no explosives. Lies or no, the article DOES NOT state what the OP purports that it does. Two wrongs do not make a right. Like I said, I believe it was a controlled demolition. But I do not approve of some liar posting utter BS about this when it only serves to discredit the cause of bringing the truth to light! |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 942322 United States 04/26/2010 12:23 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Oh really?? Quoting: Anonymous Coward 631597You are missing the point here... That FOX reporter just got caught in a huge lie...Period No, I'm not missing the point you dipshit. I have seen the videos, and I know what happened on that day. I've had 9 years to study the damn incident and I have 24 hours worth of news broadcasts from 5 different media outlets recorded on that day to study from. I know what happened! I think YOU are missing the point of what I am saying. The title of the thread is: "Fox News Says Building 7 Was controlled demolition" Yet Fox News DOES NOT say it was a controlled demolition in that article! It clearly states that the author was there that day and heard no explosives. Lies or no, the article DOES NOT state what the OP purports that it does. Two wrongs do not make a right. Like I said, I believe it was a controlled demolition. But I do not approve of some liar posting utter BS about this when it only serves to discredit the cause of bringing the truth to light! Dipshit??? Really, did I do something to offend you? |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 944444 United States 04/26/2010 12:23 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 942322 United States 04/26/2010 12:36 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 631597 Netherlands 04/26/2010 12:37 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Dipshit??? Quoting: Anonymous Coward 942322Really, did I do something to offend you? Yes, you did. I find ignorance, deceit, and blatant disregard for the truth to be very offensive, especially when it concerns one of the most important incidents of government deception and treachery in modern history. Get the facts straight or don't talk about it at all. The MSM does a good enough job of misleading the sheep already. We don't need the common citizenry taking part in the deception as well. There is no truth in that article from FOX News. There is no admission of a controlled demolition. There is only lies. It is the same thing they have been reporting from the beginning. LIES! When somebody in the mainstream finally comes out with some TRUTH, then we'll have something worthy of a pin. But for the common people to construct lies in order to give credit to their own beliefs, THAT DEFEATS THE PURPOSE! |