Planet X Proof During Eclipse! Zetas RIGHT Again!

[link to en.wikipedia.org]

The fallacy of argument from ignorance
The fallacy of argument from ignorance (sometimes known as demanding negative proof[citation needed]) is a fallacy of asserting that a claim is true as long as it has not been refuted. In other words, X is not proven simply because "not X" cannot be proven. This is related to the burden of proof, because one is placing the burden on the refutation, rather than on the proof of the assertion.

Examples in science
As a general rule, the less coherent and less embedded within conventional knowledge a claim appears, the heavier the burden of proof lies on the person asserting the claim. The scientific consensus on cold fusion is a good example. The majority of physicists believe cold fusion is not possible, since it would force the alteration or abandonment of a great many other tested and generally accepted theories about nuclear physics.

Yes, they were against suicide. That's a good point. How do you know that they weren't offed for knowing to much about Nibiru? That sounds more likely than them killing themselves to me.

WOW! The retardation continues on and on and on and on and on and on and on...

And a deleted YouTube is not proof of anything.

When a video titled "Naked eye Nibiru" gets deleted five minutes after being posted on youtube.............that is proof of the truth being hidden.

[link to en.wikipedia.org]

The fallacy of argument from ignorance
The fallacy of argument from ignorance (sometimes known as demanding negative proof[citation needed]) is a fallacy of asserting that a claim is true as long as it has not been refuted. In other words, X is not proven simply because "not X" cannot be proven. This is related to the burden of proof, because one is placing the burden on the refutation, rather than on the proof of the assertion.

Examples in science
As a general rule, the less coherent and less embedded within conventional knowledge a claim appears, the heavier the burden of proof lies on the person asserting the claim. The scientific consensus on cold fusion is a good example. The majority of physicists believe cold fusion is not possible, since it would force the alteration or abandonment of a great many other tested and generally accepted theories about nuclear physics.

First you have to prove ignorance

Can you prove extra terrestrial flying saucers exist on Earth?


If you can't does that make one ignorant?

Funny how NONE of you nibiru-tards have taken the challenge issued several days ago to find even one single piece of evidence for your imagingary planet ex that you can defend.

If you think we're "shills" and there really is a px, then come forth with some real evidence that you can support.

Let's see what you have.


See, that's the thing that you can't seem to understand. We Nibiru believers don't have to prove anything to you.

Your the ones that are in opposition, therfore you should prove that it doesn't exist.

Nibiru isn't my burden, it's yours.

~Zeus

Here´s your proof:
[link to viewzone2.com]

This article proves the "brown dwarf" G1.9 is not a brown dwarf. Care to read it, or will you dismiss it without reading?

[link to en.wikipedia.org]

The fallacy of argument from ignorance
The fallacy of argument from ignorance (sometimes known as demanding negative proof[citation needed]) is a fallacy of asserting that a claim is true as long as it has not been refuted. In other words, X is not proven simply because "not X" cannot be proven. This is related to the burden of proof, because one is placing the burden on the refutation, rather than on the proof of the assertion.

Examples in science
As a general rule, the less coherent and less embedded within conventional knowledge a claim appears, the heavier the burden of proof lies on the person asserting the claim. The scientific consensus on cold fusion is a good example. The majority of physicists believe cold fusion is not possible, since it would force the alteration or abandonment of a great many other tested and generally accepted theories about nuclear physics.

First you have to prove ignorance

Can you prove extra terrestrial flying saucers exist on Earth?


If you can't does that make one ignorant?

Funny how NONE of you nibiru-tards have taken the challenge issued several days ago to find even one single piece of evidence for your imagingary planet ex that you can defend.

If you think we're "shills" and there really is a px, then come forth with some real evidence that you can support.

Let's see what you have.


See, that's the thing that you can't seem to understand. We Nibiru believers don't have to prove anything to you.

Your the ones that are in opposition, therfore you should prove that it doesn't exist.

Nibiru isn't my burden, it's yours.

~Zeus



Well said...

De-bunkers need to debunk everything about PX, while planet X believers have to prove it only once.

This applies to UFO's too.

Only a single proof is enough.

[link to en.wikipedia.org]

First you have to prove ignorance

Can you prove extra terrestrial flying saucers exist on Earth?


If you can't does that make one ignorant?



What is it about "As a general rule, the less coherent and less embedded within conventional knowledge a claim appears, the heavier the burden of proof lies on the person asserting the claim" that you don't understand?

Well said...

De-bunkers need to debunk everything about PX, while planet X believers have to prove it only once.

This applies to UFO's too.

Only a single proof is enough.

Is it confirmed the cams shut down worldwide at the end of the eclipse?

Wow, getting a bit pissed off I see.

Just because I don't care what you believe doesn't mean I'll stop debunking you.

I'm just telling it like it is.

I gave up even caring that you understand my intentions though, and besides, it makes you look like more of an idiot and discredits you.

WTF? I'm not going to bite my tongue because I don't care about your beliefs,

If you can't stand the heat, too bad.

I'm sure your ego will make sure you continue believing that.

just because I don't care what you choose to believe does not mean I won't continue to debunk you.

That pretty much sums YOU up.


Do you have anything useful to add to this Nibiru thread other than your above six words?

~Zeus

God has full control of Nibiru, this planet of destruction, and when it is time, without any delay, it will suddenly appear between the Earth and the Sun and the three days of darkness will begin.

Thus sayeth the Lord through His prophet Elijah.


Many doubters will prove nothing. It is coming.

.


Yes, Nibiru is coming, and theres nothing anyone can say or do to stop it.

Perhaps that's the reason for all of the de-bunkers frustration?

~Zeus

Is that what you call your whole approach toward me? Heat? Please. I've seen more heat generated off of an ice cube.

Perhaps that's the reason for all of the de-bunkers frustration?

~Zeus


The only people frustrated are the kOOks like you. It's your imaginary planet that's a no-show!!!

Is it confirmed the cams shut down worldwide at the end of the eclipse?



Funny how there's lots of pictures and videos of the whole thing.

No...it's just more bullshit from Nancy.

Here´s your proof:
[link to viewzone2.com]

This article proves the "brown dwarf" G1.9 is not a brown dwarf. Care to read it, or will you dismiss it without reading?

Yes, they were against suicide. That's a good point. How do you know that they weren't offed for knowing to much about Nibiru? That sounds more likely than them killing themselves to me.

WOW! The retardation continues on and on and on and on and on and on and on...



It sure does, but not for reasons that you imply.

~Zeus

Nope. It's simply the YouTube bot deleting things that it thinks is porn. The "naked" in the title did it.

G1.9 is a supernova at 25,000 light years distance.

[link to chandra.harvard.edu]
[link to www.nasa.gov]
[link to en.wikipedia.org]
[link to arxiv.org]
[link to iopscience.iop.org]
[link to www.scientificamerican.com]
[link to www.mrao.cam.ac.uk]
[link to news.cnet.com]
[link to www.nrao.edu]

Want more?

Here´s your proof:
[link to viewzone2.com]

This article proves the "brown dwarf" G1.9 is not a brown dwarf. Care to read it, or will you dismiss it without reading?



Yes, I read your article. The article would seem to lean more toward the existence of Nibiru rather than not.

Overall, its just an internet article........it proves nothing either way.

There's alot of dis-info out there.

Thanks for sharing though.

~Zeus

Read pages 6, 7 and 8
Thread: BREAKING: Solar Eclipse has begun (Page 6)

Heavens-gate was against suicide as well, but at the end they said it was the only way to evacuate earth.

Yes, they were against suicide. That's a good point. How do you know that they weren't offed for knowing to much about Nibiru? That sounds more likely than them killing themselves to me.

~Zeus

Heavens-gate was against suicide as well, but at the end they said it was the only way to evacuate earth.

Yes, they were against suicide. That's a good point. How do you know that they weren't offed for knowing to much about Nibiru? That sounds more likely than them killing themselves to me.

~Zeus

Wow, I don't even know how to respond to that.

You obviously did not read page 2.