Blacks, whites and Asians have different ancestors – and did not come from Africa, claims scientist

A public claim by a fellow of the prestigious Royal Geographic Society that humans did not all come from Africa — and that blacks, whites and Asians have different ancestors — has been dismissed by world experts as “dangerous”, “wrong” and “racist”.

In a paper widely trumpeted and due for release in book form, Akhil Bakshi, the leader of a recent major scientific expedition supported by India’s prime minister, claims that “Negroid”, “Caucasian” and “Mongoloid” peoples are not only separate races but separate species, having evolved on different continents. Responding to the claims — developed while Bakshi led the Gondwanaland expedition from India to South Africa — Professor Lee Berger, a leading palaeoanthropologist at the University of the Witwatersrand, immediately insisted that, there were no fundamental differences between the races and that all humans had the same genetic and physical roots in Africa.

The prevalent scientific theory of modern humans — the “Out of Africa” model — is that they left Africa just 55000 years ago and replaced the last remnants of other ancient hominids living in Europe, Asia and elsewhere.

*****ARTICLE EDITED TO KEEP WITH GLP COPYRIGHT POLICY*****

[link to www.articlesafari.com]

The man is a Geographer this is FAR out of his field.



Good catch, Nikki. Just like the geographer Patton (who knows NO physics!) commenting on catastrophic cosmogenesis.. LOL

crikey

did someone say afrika?

All depends on who you believe; man has always been a lying bastard

Obviously.

If everyone was different we wouldn't be able to reproduce together.

A public claim by a fellow of the prestigious Royal Geographic Society that humans did not all come from Africa — and that blacks, whites and Asians have different ancestors — has been dismissed by world experts as “dangerous”, “wrong” and “racist”.

In a paper widely trumpeted and due for release in book form, Akhil Bakshi, the leader of a recent major scientific expedition supported by India’s prime minister, claims that “Negroid”, “Caucasian” and “Mongoloid” peoples are not only separate races but separate species, having evolved on different continents. Responding to the claims — developed while Bakshi led the Gondwanaland expedition from India to South Africa — Professor Lee Berger, a leading palaeoanthropologist at the University of the Witwatersrand, immediately insisted that, there were no fundamental differences between the races and that all humans had the same genetic and physical roots in Africa.

The prevalent scientific theory of modern humans — the “Out of Africa” model — is that they left Africa just 55000 years ago and replaced the last remnants of other ancient hominids living in Europe, Asia and elsewhere.

*****ARTICLE EDITED TO KEEP WITH GLP COPYRIGHT POLICY*****

[link to www.articlesafari.com]

yes, present-day DNA studies say that all humans
are derived from a small group in NW Africa that
survived an extinction event 70,000 years ago.
that means that the original humans were black,
and that "white people" are some kind of
albino mutants.

What an ioditic statement with no basis in fact. Several different animal SPECIES can intermate but are NOT the same and produce a hybrid!

A public claim by a fellow of the prestigious Royal Geographic Society that humans did not all come from Africa — and that blacks, whites and Asians have different ancestors — has been dismissed by world experts as “dangerous”, “wrong” and “racist”.

In a paper widely trumpeted and due for release in book form, Akhil Bakshi, the leader of a recent major scientific expedition supported by India’s prime minister, claims that “Negroid”, “Caucasian” and “Mongoloid” peoples are not only separate races but separate species, having evolved on different continents. Responding to the claims — developed while Bakshi led the Gondwanaland expedition from India to South Africa — Professor Lee Berger, a leading palaeoanthropologist at the University of the Witwatersrand, immediately insisted that, there were no fundamental differences between the races and that all humans had the same genetic and physical roots in Africa.

The prevalent scientific theory of modern humans — the “Out of Africa” model — is that they left Africa just 55000 years ago and replaced the last remnants of other ancient hominids living in Europe, Asia and elsewhere.

*****ARTICLE EDITED TO KEEP WITH GLP COPYRIGHT POLICY*****

[link to www.articlesafari.com]

What an ioditic statement with no basis in fact. Several different animal SPECIES can intermate but are NOT the same and produce a hybrid!

A public claim by a fellow of the prestigious Royal Geographic Society that humans did not all come from Africa — and that blacks, whites and Asians have different ancestors — has been dismissed by world experts as “dangerous”, “wrong” and “racist”.

In a paper widely trumpeted and due for release in book form, Akhil Bakshi, the leader of a recent major scientific expedition supported by India’s prime minister, claims that “Negroid”, “Caucasian” and “Mongoloid” peoples are not only separate races but separate species, having evolved on different continents. Responding to the claims — developed while Bakshi led the Gondwanaland expedition from India to South Africa — Professor Lee Berger, a leading palaeoanthropologist at the University of the Witwatersrand, immediately insisted that, there were no fundamental differences between the races and that all humans had the same genetic and physical roots in Africa.

The prevalent scientific theory of modern humans — the “Out of Africa” model — is that they left Africa just 55000 years ago and replaced the last remnants of other ancient hominids living in Europe, Asia and elsewhere.

*****ARTICLE EDITED TO KEEP WITH GLP COPYRIGHT POLICY*****

[link to www.articlesafari.com]

"Bakshi admitted to the Sunday Times that “some of my points may prove to be wrong, and may be seen as politically incorrect."

This gives him CREDIBILITY, as anyone who passed college-level debate can tell you.

the truth is man first left the old world gondwanaland via tasmania though australia timor asia europe to africa. the big q is why would an unseaquesting man (aust aboridgine ) leave aust to head south to tasmania(very cold)wearing possum skins,and how did he get there?

The introduction of RH-negative blood type is not a naturally occurring part of evolution, it was introduced by an outside source. Many ancient texts, including the Bible, speak of gods coming down from the Heavens and creating man in their own image. Ancient texts also tell us that they began to take humans as their spouses, and had many children. But not all humans were a result of interbreeding. The first human was a result of scientific research combining primates with the god’s genes. The first humans were not a product of interbreeding, but small portions of humans are a result of this interbreeding and their blood type can support this.


If the RH-negative factor is a ‘normal’ presentation of blood, then why is there a problem when a mother of the RH-negative blood group gives birth to an RH-positive blood group baby. This Hemolytic disease, actually an allergic reaction, can cause death when the two different blood groups are mingled during pregnancy. When the antigenic substances attack the negative blood group it can destroy the blood cells. So why does the human body produce antigens to this blood type? Is the blood group alien?

Comprehensive studies of blood types also show that Mayans, Incas and Auracanians are all virtually 100% group O, with 5-20% of the population being rhesus negative. This was the blood type of the original Europeans and stems from Cro-Magnon man (Kurlansky, 2001). The races that possess this blood type are races of the Americas, the Canary Islands, the Berbers, the Basques, and Gaelic Kelts. Due to the larger weatern European numbers, it is a safe bet that was where it was introduced into the human genetic code, possibly from the fabled Atlantis to the west in the distant past. Could this also be where the Caucasian was introduced? Is the introduction of Caucasian related to the RH-blood factor?

The only other time this occurs in nature is, as an example, when donkeys and horses are crossed to produce mules. This is not ‘natural’ because left alone in the wild, these animals would never cross breed. Only with intervention would this happen. Was there a cross breeding of two human like beings, similar but genetically different?

In the study of genetics, we find that we can only inherit what our ancestors had, nothing more and nothing less. Blood factors are transmitted with much more exactitude than any other characteristic. If mankind evolved from the same African ancestor their blood would be compatible. Where did the Rh negatives come from? Why does the body of an Rh negative mother carrying an Rh positive child reject her own offspring?

the word "God" that you use is really "gods", and guess what color those "gods" were? Google all the tribes from the Dogan to the Maya and find out the skin color of their creator "gods", assuming you can handle some reality which i doubt

IQ Differences: Do they exist and can we admit it?
...the vast majority of people scoring in the genius range are whites, white men actually. The IQ range of white women is similar to that of East Asians - they are overwhelmingly scoring in the 'normal' range, and very few are either particularly dull or spectacularly gifted.

[link to www.globalpolitician.com]

What an ioditic statement with no basis in fact. Several different animal SPECIES can intermate but are NOT the same and produce a hybrid!

A public claim by a fellow of the prestigious Royal Geographic Society that humans did not all come from Africa — and that blacks, whites and Asians have different ancestors — has been dismissed by world experts as “dangerous”, “wrong” and “racist”.

In a paper widely trumpeted and due for release in book form, Akhil Bakshi, the leader of a recent major scientific expedition supported by India’s prime minister, claims that “Negroid”, “Caucasian” and “Mongoloid” peoples are not only separate races but separate species, having evolved on different continents. Responding to the claims — developed while Bakshi led the Gondwanaland expedition from India to South Africa — Professor Lee Berger, a leading palaeoanthropologist at the University of the Witwatersrand, immediately insisted that, there were no fundamental differences between the races and that all humans had the same genetic and physical roots in Africa.

The prevalent scientific theory of modern humans — the “Out of Africa” model — is that they left Africa just 55000 years ago and replaced the last remnants of other ancient hominids living in Europe, Asia and elsewhere.

*****ARTICLE EDITED TO KEEP WITH GLP COPYRIGHT POLICY*****

[link to www.articlesafari.com]