THE EARTH IS GOING TO EXPAND VIOLENTLY

nah, i think the story is quiet simple:

i come here to share ideas and find out about the shits they didn't teach us in high school or ignored by a scientific community that violently tries to defend its stand on science by intimidating others just like you do

you sir, on the other hand are scared to death that your little universe (or paradigm) will implode and be shattered and thats why you clench to science so damn tight like a toddler to his mama's hand


+1

The first thing anyone needs is an open mind.

That especially applies to the universe where it's obvious there is much we still don't know.

Expansion and Contraction Are both Part of Plate Tectonic Theory
... which is bogus.


OP was right in a way.

He just doesn't realize the body he's looking for is clearly visible.

You stupid drones, I already told you it's post glacial rebound effect. Look it up or do I have to spoon feed you.


Post glacial rebound??

What's the condensed version of that theory?

A compressed sponge (earth) expands due to millions of tons of ice disappearing from land too rapidly.

New refreshing ideas.

(snip)
Keep going, he probably misspelled something.

Expansion and Contraction Are both Part of Plate Tectonic Theory
... which is bogus.


OP was right in a way.

He just doesn't realize the body he's looking for is clearly visible.

By definition the Earth IS expanding. Simply by its accumilation of dust and water each year, no?

Plate Tectonic is just a theory as well.

Personally I chose Expanding Earth, makes more sense.

By definition the Earth IS expanding. Simply by its accumilation of dust and water each year, no?

Plate Tectonic is just a theory as well.

Personally I chose Expanding Earth, makes more sense.





There are also other things though that help make the expanding earth theory make sense to me.

One that has always sort of stuck out to me is the size of dinosaurs and basically all prehistoric creatures. Sharks like Megaladon and large plant eating dinosaurs like brontasaurus.

We obviously have no creatures even remotely that size today, seems easier for them to live and thrive on a low gravity world.

By definition the Earth IS expanding. Simply by its accumilation of dust and water each year, no?

Plate Tectonic is just a theory as well.

Personally I chose Expanding Earth, makes more sense.





There are also other things though that help make the expanding earth theory make sense to me.

One that has always sort of stuck out to me is the size of dinosaurs and basically all prehistoric creatures. Sharks like Megaladon and large plant eating dinosaurs like brontasaurus.

We obviously have no creatures even remotely that size today, seems easier for them to live and thrive on a low gravity world.

By definition the Earth IS expanding. Simply by its accumilation of dust and water each year, no?

Plate Tectonic is just a theory as well.

Personally I chose Expanding Earth, makes more sense.





There are also other things though that help make the expanding earth theory make sense to me.

One that has always sort of stuck out to me is the size of dinosaurs and basically all prehistoric creatures. Sharks like Megaladon and large plant eating dinosaurs like brontasaurus.

We obviously have no creatures even remotely that size today, seems easier for them to live and thrive on a low gravity world.



So, are you saying that the Earth's gravity was lower 70 million years ago? Do you have the slightest evidence this is the case? Or is it more crap pulled from your ass?

By definition the Earth IS expanding. Simply by its accumilation of dust and water each year, no?

Plate Tectonic is just a theory as well.

Personally I chose Expanding Earth, makes more sense.





There are also other things though that help make the expanding earth theory make sense to me.

One that has always sort of stuck out to me is the size of dinosaurs and basically all prehistoric creatures. Sharks like Megaladon and large plant eating dinosaurs like brontasaurus.

We obviously have no creatures even remotely that size today, seems easier for them to live and thrive on a low gravity world.

By definition the Earth IS expanding. Simply by its accumilation of dust and water each year, no?

Plate Tectonic is just a theory as well.

Personally I chose Expanding Earth, makes more sense.





There are also other things though that help make the expanding earth theory make sense to me.

One that has always sort of stuck out to me is the size of dinosaurs and basically all prehistoric creatures. Sharks like Megaladon and large plant eating dinosaurs like brontasaurus.

We obviously have no creatures even remotely that size today, seems easier for them to live and thrive on a low gravity world.



So, are you saying that the Earth's gravity was lower 70 million years ago? Do you have the slightest evidence this is the case? Or is it more crap pulled from your ass?

Expansion and Contraction Are both Part of Plate Tectonic Theory

Expansion and Contraction Are both Part of Plate Tectonic Theory

do yourself a big favor, BF, and check this link out:

[link to www.nealadams.com]

What if EVERYTHING is 'expanding' ?

Including all the tools we use to measure size and distance ?

In that case, relatively speaking, we would be clueless.

That's what all this is building up too. That's what destroyed past civilizations and species. Just about any earth mystery can be explained by an expanding earth.

Probably related to a gravitational interaction with some as yet unseen astronomical body.
If this is the case, then ancients calculated the orbit and thus the 2012 timeline.

Good post OP, and interesting theory to ponder.

Don't feed the trolls though, they are here to steal energy away from healthy discussions.

And don't rely on Mods; they usually side with the agitators...

The reason GLP is only a good forum and not a great forum is that it doesn't have an ignore button.

That, and the other reason that I can't mention or they throw a hissy fit and ban me.

:voicehead:

You stupid drones, I already told you it's post glacial rebound effect. Look it up or do I have to spoon feed you.


Post glacial rebound??

What's the condensed version of that theory?

A compressed sponge (earth) expands due to millions of tons of ice disappearing from land too rapidly.

You stupid drones, I already told you it's post glacial rebound effect. Look it up or do I have to spoon feed you.


Post glacial rebound??

What's the condensed version of that theory?

A compressed sponge (earth) expands due to millions of tons of ice disappearing from land too rapidly.

its effects can and are being measured on lake superior

people on south side of lake thought water was rising
people on north side thought it receding
they measured........and north side is still rising.....10,000 years after Ice left
causing tilt........which is appearing as rise in water level on south shore.............Help any??

By definition the Earth IS expanding. Simply by its accumilation of dust and water each year, no?

Plate Tectonic is just a theory as well.

Personally I chose Expanding Earth, makes more sense.





There are also other things though that help make the expanding earth theory make sense to me.

One that has always sort of stuck out to me is the size of dinosaurs and basically all prehistoric creatures. Sharks like Megaladon and large plant eating dinosaurs like brontasaurus.

We obviously have no creatures even remotely that size today, seems easier for them to live and thrive on a low gravity world.



So, are you saying that the Earth's gravity was lower 70 million years ago? Do you have the slightest evidence this is the case? Or is it more crap pulled from your ass?

By definition the Earth IS expanding. Simply by its accumilation of dust and water each year, no?

Plate Tectonic is just a theory as well.

Personally I chose Expanding Earth, makes more sense.





There are also other things though that help make the expanding earth theory make sense to me.

One that has always sort of stuck out to me is the size of dinosaurs and basically all prehistoric creatures. Sharks like Megaladon and large plant eating dinosaurs like brontasaurus.

We obviously have no creatures even remotely that size today, seems easier for them to live and thrive on a low gravity world.



So, are you saying that the Earth's gravity was lower 70 million years ago? Do you have the slightest evidence this is the case? Or is it more crap pulled from your ass?

I've been reading all the threads and see that there is a lot of conjunture and disagreements.

I have questions for the genius'.

1. Why is the sun emiting different rays - according to some scientists it has started to change basic DNA. It is correct to assume it can then change the earth and in particular the interior?

2. With the mathematical predictions Velikovsky made can we assume that a large planetary body is closely approaching along with its own debris trail?

3. The entire solar system has seen many changes in particular the color spectrum where chemical composition is changing, why and where have these changes occured and started?

4. The solar system has stated to enter a massive electrical storm and how does that affect us here.

5. We have been hit with CME's in the last 3 to 4 days. How is that going to affect our weather and consequently the interior of the earth?

6. Palentologists have discovered that insects caught in tree sap have had close to 100% oxygen trapped with them. Does this mean that the dionasours grew to enourmous sizes because of the oxygen available in the air?

7. From all of my personal observations worldwide I know that many earth changing processes happen quite suddenly. Does this mean some things can't change slowly?

I have many more questions - more than answers, but I am always looking for that golden nugget of wisdom that connects the dots instead of attacks on posters from people who think they are wiser than everyone else.




By definition the Earth IS expanding. Simply by its accumilation of dust and water each year, no?

Plate Tectonic is just a theory as well.

Personally I chose Expanding Earth, makes more sense.





There are also other things though that help make the expanding earth theory make sense to me.

One that has always sort of stuck out to me is the size of dinosaurs and basically all prehistoric creatures. Sharks like Megaladon and large plant eating dinosaurs like brontasaurus.

We obviously have no creatures even remotely that size today, seems easier for them to live and thrive on a low gravity world.



So, are you saying that the Earth's gravity was lower 70 million years ago? Do you have the slightest evidence this is the case? Or is it more crap pulled from your ass?



I agree. Lower gravity (which means less Earth mass) would not cause creatures to grow larger. A higher O2 content might or fewer predators or larger flora which require larger bodies to access.

Silly commentator. If the Earth was smaller 70 million years ago it would exhibit less gravity then what is measured today. Don't you understand anything about basic physics?