Godlike Productions - Discussion Forum
Users Online Now: 2,007 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 1,569,666
Pageviews Today: 2,162,393Threads Today: 523Posts Today: 9,649
04:54 PM


Rate this Thread

Absolute BS Crap Reasonable Nice Amazing
 

Supreme Court rejects challenge to "under God" in Pledge of Allegiance

 
ApocalypseWars.com
Offer Upgrade

User ID: 1280429
United States
06/16/2011 10:59 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Supreme Court rejects challenge to "under God" in Pledge of Allegiance
And may I say Amen to my fellow brother Knights, the brotherhood and also ALL Christians and other Knight orders who appreciate this GREAT victory. Regardless of our religious denominations, this is a win for ALL believers.
_____________________________________________

Knights of Columbus waged successful defense on East and West Coast cases

June 14, 2011 - Flag Day

(NEW HAVEN, CONN.) - The United States Supreme Court has refused to hear an appeal of a lawsuit challenging the constitutionality of the Pledge of Allegiance, thus ending a seven year battle involving two separate cases, one originating in California and the other in New Hampshire. The Knights of Columbus, represented by the Becket Fund for Religious Liberty, played a key role in defending the Pledge as a "defendant intervenor" in both cases.

"The Knights of Columbus is proud to have played a major role in successfully defending the constitutionality of the words 'under God' in the Pledge of Allegiance," Supreme Knight Carl A. Anderson said. "We were instrumental in persuading Congress to add those words to the Pledge in 1954, and they express a fundamental belief that we have held as a nation since our founding, that we 'are endowed by our creator with certain unalienable rights.' The notion that this somehow violates the First Amendment has now been soundly rejected by both the First and Ninth Circuit Courts of Appeal, and the Supreme Court has now allowed both decisions to stand. It is a victory for common sense."

The Ninth Circuit upheld the constitutionality of the Pledge in March 2010 and the Supreme Court refused to hear an appeal of the California case in March 2011. The First Circuit upheld the constitutionality of the Pledge in November 2011 and the Supreme Court denied certiorari in that case yesterday, June 13, 2011.

Vivat Jesus!

Last Edited by Gnostic Warrior on 06/16/2011 11:00 AM
Regards,

Moe

[link to GnosticWarrior.com] THERE IS A WAR FOR YOUR SOUL!

[link to www.LoanSafe.org] FIGHTING BIG BANKS!
olaf
User ID: 1430795
Netherlands
06/16/2011 11:07 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Supreme Court rejects challenge to "under God" in Pledge of Allegiance
is pierisee illegal ?
ApocalypseWars.com  (OP)

User ID: 1280429
United States
06/16/2011 11:11 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Supreme Court rejects challenge to "under God" in Pledge of Allegiance
is pierisee illegal ?
 Quoting: olaf 1430795


huh> what does that mean?
Regards,

Moe

[link to GnosticWarrior.com] THERE IS A WAR FOR YOUR SOUL!

[link to www.LoanSafe.org] FIGHTING BIG BANKS!
Karu

User ID: 826286
United States
06/16/2011 11:57 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Supreme Court rejects challenge to "under God" in Pledge of Allegiance
hf
ApocalypseWars.com  (OP)

User ID: 1280429
United States
06/16/2011 12:02 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Supreme Court rejects challenge to "under God" in Pledge of Allegiance
newsflashoyesbuttbananahappydance
Regards,

Moe

[link to GnosticWarrior.com] THERE IS A WAR FOR YOUR SOUL!

[link to www.LoanSafe.org] FIGHTING BIG BANKS!
ApocalypseWars.com  (OP)

User ID: 1280429
United States
06/16/2011 12:55 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Supreme Court rejects challenge to "under God" in Pledge of Allegiance
clappa
Regards,

Moe

[link to GnosticWarrior.com] THERE IS A WAR FOR YOUR SOUL!

[link to www.LoanSafe.org] FIGHTING BIG BANKS!
"/ 1000's of years
User ID: 1430795
Netherlands
06/16/2011 05:24 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Supreme Court rejects challenge to "under God" in Pledge of Allegiance
is pierisee illegal ?
 Quoting: olaf 1430795


huh> what does that mean?
 Quoting: ApocalypseWars.com


thanks about one of the worst replays you can get back but anyway.
ApocalypseWars.com  (OP)

User ID: 1280429
United States
06/16/2011 05:28 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Supreme Court rejects challenge to "under God" in Pledge of Allegiance
is pierisee illegal ?
 Quoting: olaf 1430795


huh> what does that mean?
 Quoting: ApocalypseWars.com


thanks about one of the worst replays you can get back but anyway.
 Quoting: "/ 1000's of years 1430795


Must be a Dutch inside joke. beavis Oh, hahaha, ha, ha...
Regards,

Moe

[link to GnosticWarrior.com] THERE IS A WAR FOR YOUR SOUL!

[link to www.LoanSafe.org] FIGHTING BIG BANKS!
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1430745
United States
06/17/2011 11:02 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Supreme Court rejects challenge to "under God" in Pledge of Allegiance
And may I say Amen to my fellow brother Knights, the brotherhood and also ALL Christians and other Knight orders who appreciate this GREAT victory. Regardless of our religious denominations, this is a win for ALL believers.
_____________________________________________

Knights of Columbus waged successful defense on East and West Coast cases

June 14, 2011 - Flag Day

(NEW HAVEN, CONN.) - The United States Supreme Court has refused to hear an appeal of a lawsuit challenging the constitutionality of the Pledge of Allegiance, thus ending a seven year battle involving two separate cases, one originating in California and the other in New Hampshire. The Knights of Columbus, represented by the Becket Fund for Religious Liberty, played a key role in defending the Pledge as a "defendant intervenor" in both cases.

"The Knights of Columbus is proud to have played a major role in successfully defending the constitutionality of the words 'under God' in the Pledge of Allegiance," Supreme Knight Carl A. Anderson said. "We were instrumental in persuading Congress to add those words to the Pledge in 1954, and they express a fundamental belief that we have held as a nation since our founding, that we 'are endowed by our creator with certain unalienable rights.' The notion that this somehow violates the First Amendment has now been soundly rejected by both the First and Ninth Circuit Courts of Appeal, and the Supreme Court has now allowed both decisions to stand. It is a victory for common sense."

The Ninth Circuit upheld the constitutionality of the Pledge in March 2010 and the Supreme Court refused to hear an appeal of the California case in March 2011. The First Circuit upheld the constitutionality of the Pledge in November 2011 and the Supreme Court denied certiorari in that case yesterday, June 13, 2011.

Vivat Jesus!
 Quoting: ApocalypseWars.com


Who the fuck gave these mother fuckers to right to represent "the nation"? And what do these mother fuckers know about common sense? In this day and age, anyone who actually have "common sense" should reject all organized religion, period.
ApocalypseWars.com  (OP)

User ID: 1280429
United States
06/17/2011 11:26 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Supreme Court rejects challenge to "under God" in Pledge of Allegiance
And may I say Amen to my fellow brother Knights, the brotherhood and also ALL Christians and other Knight orders who appreciate this GREAT victory. Regardless of our religious denominations, this is a win for ALL believers.
_____________________________________________

Knights of Columbus waged successful defense on East and West Coast cases

June 14, 2011 - Flag Day

(NEW HAVEN, CONN.) - The United States Supreme Court has refused to hear an appeal of a lawsuit challenging the constitutionality of the Pledge of Allegiance, thus ending a seven year battle involving two separate cases, one originating in California and the other in New Hampshire. The Knights of Columbus, represented by the Becket Fund for Religious Liberty, played a key role in defending the Pledge as a "defendant intervenor" in both cases.

"The Knights of Columbus is proud to have played a major role in successfully defending the constitutionality of the words 'under God' in the Pledge of Allegiance," Supreme Knight Carl A. Anderson said. "We were instrumental in persuading Congress to add those words to the Pledge in 1954, and they express a fundamental belief that we have held as a nation since our founding, that we 'are endowed by our creator with certain unalienable rights.' The notion that this somehow violates the First Amendment has now been soundly rejected by both the First and Ninth Circuit Courts of Appeal, and the Supreme Court has now allowed both decisions to stand. It is a victory for common sense."

The Ninth Circuit upheld the constitutionality of the Pledge in March 2010 and the Supreme Court refused to hear an appeal of the California case in March 2011. The First Circuit upheld the constitutionality of the Pledge in November 2011 and the Supreme Court denied certiorari in that case yesterday, June 13, 2011.

Vivat Jesus!
 Quoting: ApocalypseWars.com


Who the fuck gave these mother fuckers to right to represent "the nation"? And what do these mother fuckers know about common sense? In this day and age, anyone who actually have "common sense" should reject all organized religion, period.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1430745


We are the strong right arm of the Roman Catholic Church. Hence, in your language, we get fawking shit done for the brotherhood and don't just talk smack like wanna be bad asses from behind our computers like your pathetic self.

It is obvious that you do not have any rites or intelligence to do the same because you seem a bit angry and if not jealous that we can do these things "you hate."

Now, go smoke some weed and chill bro....
Regards,

Moe

[link to GnosticWarrior.com] THERE IS A WAR FOR YOUR SOUL!

[link to www.LoanSafe.org] FIGHTING BIG BANKS!





GLP