MAJOR!! Scientists: unseen huge planet in our solar system not discovered | |
Halcyon Dayz, FCD User ID: 1222987 Netherlands 08/04/2011 07:36 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | PIN THIS!!! Quoting: hoopityWhy? The Tyche hypothesis was published in 1999. On the internet that's the Stone Age. The subject has been discussed here on numerous occasions. [link to en.wikipedia.org] mainstream confirmation that yes, there's a huge planet out there, bigger than Jupiter, which we haven't observed yet, but which has a gravitational effect!!! Quoting: hoopityYou might want to read that again. It does not say confirmed. The gravitational effects would be on bodies in the Oort cloud, not on the inner Solar system. can we work on this mainstream hypothesis, and find evidence to link it to other phenomena? specifically, any evidence or observations that past cultures have tracked or otherwise observed any such object which might fit some of the evidence which is slowly emerging from this hypothesis? Quoting: hoopityNope. Tyche, if it exists, is a superjupiter or small brown dwarf nearly a quarter of a lightyear away orbiting the Sun once every 1,8 million years. If we can't see it, Bronze Age people certainly wouldn't either. Not so fast... Quoting: Horatio Magellan CrunchAvoiding Nemesis: Does the impact rate for asteroids and comets vary periodically with time? MPIA Science Release 2011-08-01 Several studies have claimed to have found periodic variations, with the probability of giant impacts increasing and decreasing in a regular pattern. Now a new analysis by Coryn Bailer-Jones from the Max Planck Institute for Astronomy (MPIA), published in the Monthly Notes of the Royal Astronomical Society, shows those simple periodic patterns to be statistical artifacts. The Nemesis and Tyche Hypothesis aren't really related. The Nemesis Hypothesis was proposed in the early 80s as an explanation for a perceived periodicity in extinction events. The Tyche Hypothesis was proposed in 1999 to explain a perceived irregularity in the origin points of long-period comets. Quoting: Strictlyhonest.com In astronomy Planet X means any undiscovered planet beyond Neptune. [link to en.wikipedia.org] This article is the announcement of the discovery of Eris, now, with Pluto, reclassified as a Dwarf Planet. Reaching for the sky makes you taller. Hi! My name is Halcyon Dayz and I'm addicted to morans. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1494292 United States 08/04/2011 08:41 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | PIN THIS!!! Quoting: hoopityWhy? The Tyche hypothesis was published in 1999. On the internet that's the Stone Age. The subject has been discussed here on numerous occasions. [link to en.wikipedia.org] mainstream confirmation that yes, there's a huge planet out there, bigger than Jupiter, which we haven't observed yet, but which has a gravitational effect!!! Quoting: hoopityYou might want to read that again. It does not say confirmed. The gravitational effects would be on bodies in the Oort cloud, not on the inner Solar system. can we work on this mainstream hypothesis, and find evidence to link it to other phenomena? specifically, any evidence or observations that past cultures have tracked or otherwise observed any such object which might fit some of the evidence which is slowly emerging from this hypothesis? Quoting: hoopityNope. Tyche, if it exists, is a superjupiter or small brown dwarf nearly a quarter of a lightyear away orbiting the Sun once every 1,8 million years. If we can't see it, Bronze Age people certainly wouldn't either. Not so fast... Quoting: Horatio Magellan CrunchAvoiding Nemesis: Does the impact rate for asteroids and comets vary periodically with time? MPIA Science Release 2011-08-01 Several studies have claimed to have found periodic variations, with the probability of giant impacts increasing and decreasing in a regular pattern. Now a new analysis by Coryn Bailer-Jones from the Max Planck Institute for Astronomy (MPIA), published in the Monthly Notes of the Royal Astronomical Society, shows those simple periodic patterns to be statistical artifacts. The Nemesis and Tyche Hypothesis aren't really related. The Nemesis Hypothesis was proposed in the early 80s as an explanation for a perceived periodicity in extinction events. The Tyche Hypothesis was proposed in 1999 to explain a perceived irregularity in the origin points of long-period comets. Quoting: Strictlyhonest.com In astronomy Planet X means any undiscovered planet beyond Neptune. [link to en.wikipedia.org] This article is the announcement of the discovery of Eris, now, with Pluto, reclassified as a Dwarf Planet. did you even read the article? nothing which you wrote here relates to anything in the article. I never said the idea itself is new. I said these scientists have announced they have real evidence. I never said this changes any existing theory. I said the significance is that these scientists are confirming the existence of this evidence, and giving this topic new attention. what even are we arguing about here? what's your point? respectfully, your main point seems to be to downplay the meaning of my link. could we instead please focus on the topic of this here please? could anyone here please help me out a bit here? appreciate any input on this or about it. thanks. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1491810 Puerto Rico 08/04/2011 08:56 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | not new...just been buried:) Quoting: Anonymous Coward 989190Washington Post 1983: By Thomas O'Toole, Washington Post Staff Writer Friday, December 30, 1983 ; Page A1 A heavenly body possibly as large as the giant planet Jupiter and possibly so close to Earth that it would be part of this solar system has been found in the direction of the constellation Orion by an orbiting telescope aboard the U.S. infrared astronomical satellite. So mysterious is the object that astronomers do not know if it is a planet, a giant comet, a nearby "protostar" that never got hot enough to become a star, a distant galaxy so young that it is still in the process of forming its first stars or a galaxy so shrouded in dust that none of the light cast by its stars ever gets through. "All I can tell you is that we don't know what it is," Dr. Gerry Neugebauer, IRAS chief scientist for California's Jet Propulsion Laboratory and director of the Palomar Observatory for the California Institute of Technology, said in an interview. The most fascinating explanation of this mystery body, which is so cold it casts no light and has never been seen by optical telescopes on Earth or in space, is that it is a giant gaseous planet as large as Jupiter and as close to Earth as 50 trillion miles. While that may seem like a great distance in earthbound terms, it is a stone's throw in cosmological terms, so close in fact that it would be the nearest heavenly body to Earth beyond the outermost planet Pluto. "If it is really that close, it would be a part of our solar system," said Dr. James Houck of Cornell University's Center for Radio Physics and Space Research and a member of the IRAS science team. "If it is that close, I don't know how the world's planetary scientists would even begin to classify it." The mystery body was seen twice by the infrared satellite as it scanned the northern sky from last January to November, when the satellite ran out of the supercold helium that allowed its telescope to see the coldest bodies in the heavens. The second observation took place six months after the first and suggested the mystery body had not moved from its spot in the sky near the western edge of the constellation Orion in that time. "This suggests it's not a comet because a comet would not be as large as the one we've observed and a comet would probably have moved," Houck said. "A planet may have moved if it were as close as 50 trillion miles but it could still be a more distant planet and not have moved in six months time." Whatever it is, Houck said, the mystery body is so cold its temperature is no more than 40 degrees above "absolute" zero, which is 456 degrees Fahrenheit below zero. The telescope aboard IRAS is cooled so low and is so sensitive it can "see" objects in the heavens that are only 20 degrees above absolute zero. When IRAS scientists first saw the mystery body and calculated that it could be as close as 50 trillion miles, there was some speculation that it might be moving toward Earth. "It's not incoming mail," Cal Tech's Neugebauer said. "I want to douse that idea with as much cold water as I can." Then, what is it? What if it is as large as Jupiter and so close to the sun it would be part of the solar system? Conceivably, it could be the 10th planet astronomers have searched for in vain. It also might be a Jupiter-like star that started out to become a star eons ago but never got hot enough like the sun to become a star. While they cannot disprove that notion, Neugebauer and Houck are so bedeviled by it that they do not want to accept it. Neugebauer and Houck "hope" the mystery body is a distant galaxy either so young that its stars have not begun to shine or so surrounded by dust that its starlight cannot penetrate the shroud. "I believe it's one of these dark, young galaxies that we have never been able to observe before," Neugebauer said. "If it is, then it is a major step forward in our understanding of the size of the universe, how the universe formed and how it continues to form as time goes on." The next step in pinpointing what the mystery body is, Neuegebauer said, is to search for it with the world's largest optical telescopes. Already, the 100-inch diameter telescope at Cerro del Tololo in Chile has begun its search and the 200-inch telescope at Palomar Mountain in California has earmarked several nights next year to look for it. If the body is close enough and emits even a hint of light, the Palomar telescope should find it since the infrared satellite has pinpointed its position. December 31, 1983, Saturday, Final Edition The distance from earth of a mysterious object in space was reported incorrectly in some editions yesterday. The correct figure is 50 billion miles Yea, old news, I remember reading about this years ago, more than once it has been brought up. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1432649 Norway 08/04/2011 08:59 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 1454966 United States 08/04/2011 10:25 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 1454966 United States 08/04/2011 11:21 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Halcyon Dayz, FCD User ID: 1222987 Netherlands 08/04/2011 11:22 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | did you even read the article? nothing which you wrote here relates to anything in the article. That's odd. I never said the idea itself is new. I said these scientists have announced they have real evidence. Quoting: hoopityWhich is just more of the same evidence. A telescope beats mathematical modelling every day of the week. what even are we arguing about here? what's your point? Quoting: hoopityYour unwarranted sensationalism and your lie about it being confirmed. respectfully, your main point seems to be to downplay the meaning of my link. could we instead please focus on the topic of this here please? Quoting: hoopityThe topic is Tyche. A hypothesis that has not yet been confirmed. It is interesting. It is however not remotely doomey or woowoo. It is NOT Nibiru or any other mythtaken planet/star. Yea, old news, I remember reading about this years ago, more than once it has been brought up. Quoting: Puerto Rican 1491810Which is rather odd considering all the 'mystery' objects have been identified. The woowoos keep citing this piece of bad journalism but never ever cite the actual scientific papers. Guess facts are irrelevant in lalaland. Reaching for the sky makes you taller. Hi! My name is Halcyon Dayz and I'm addicted to morans. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1493919 United States 08/05/2011 01:10 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | PIN THIS!!! mainstream confirmation that yes, there's a huge planet out there, bigger than jupiter, which we haven't observed yet, but which has a gravitational effect!!! Quoting: hoopity[link to www.scientificamerican.com] Scientists: big planet out there somewhere.A planet-size object could be behind the odd departure of some comets from the Oort Cloud--and toward us. just cuz they haven't observed it yet doesn't mean the rest of us haven't but yeah right anybody who believes they need to wait for confirmation from on high before they can accept anything as truth will be barking up the wrong tree till the cows come home if in fact they ever do |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1480251 United States 08/05/2011 01:11 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | did you even read the article? nothing which you wrote here relates to anything in the article. That's odd. I never said the idea itself is new. I said these scientists have announced they have real evidence. Quoting: hoopityWhich is just more of the same evidence. A telescope beats mathematical modelling every day of the week. what even are we arguing about here? what's your point? Quoting: hoopityYour unwarranted sensationalism and your lie about it being confirmed. respectfully, your main point seems to be to downplay the meaning of my link. could we instead please focus on the topic of this here please? Quoting: hoopityThe topic is Tyche. A hypothesis that has not yet been confirmed. It is interesting. It is however not remotely doomey or woowoo. It is NOT Nibiru or any other mythtaken planet/star. Yea, old news, I remember reading about this years ago, more than once it has been brought up. Quoting: Puerto Rican 1491810Which is rather odd considering all the 'mystery' objects have been identified. The woowoos keep citing this piece of bad journalism but never ever cite the actual scientific papers. Guess facts are irrelevant in lalaland. hello? this is the part of the article which is important. Every so often a comet gets flung out of the Oort Cloud, a swarm of comets on the fringes of the solar system, and gets close enough to Earth for us to see it. But they don't seem to be scattered at random. “There's an abundance of them around a great circle in the sky, and that suggests that there's something perturbing them in from this great circle.” you seem to be ignoring that in your reply. that's the whole point of this thread. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1480251 United States 08/05/2011 01:14 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | did you even read the article? nothing which you wrote here relates to anything in the article. That's odd. I never said the idea itself is new. I said these scientists have announced they have real evidence. Quoting: hoopityWhich is just more of the same evidence. A telescope beats mathematical modelling every day of the week. what even are we arguing about here? what's your point? Quoting: hoopityYour unwarranted sensationalism and your lie about it being confirmed. respectfully, your main point seems to be to downplay the meaning of my link. could we instead please focus on the topic of this here please? Quoting: hoopityThe topic is Tyche. A hypothesis that has not yet been confirmed. It is interesting. It is however not remotely doomey or woowoo. It is NOT Nibiru or any other mythtaken planet/star. I never said it was doomey or woowoo. a little hard to follow you here sometimes. |
Horatio Magellan Crunch User ID: 1418316 United States 08/05/2011 05:47 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Not so fast... Quoting: Horatio Magellan CrunchAvoiding Nemesis: Does the impact rate for asteroids and comets vary periodically with time? MPIA Science Release 2011-08-01 Several studies have claimed to have found periodic variations, with the probability of giant impacts increasing and decreasing in a regular pattern. Now a new analysis by Coryn Bailer-Jones from the Max Planck Institute for Astronomy (MPIA), published in the Monthly Notes of the Royal Astronomical Society, shows those simple periodic patterns to be statistical artifacts. The Nemesis and Tyche Hypothesis aren't really related. The Nemesis Hypothesis was proposed in the early 80s as an explanation for a perceived periodicity in extinction events. The Tyche Hypothesis was proposed in 1999 to explain a perceived irregularity in the origin points of long-period comets. But they are related. The Tyche hypothesis was in response to the fact that they didn't find Nemesis in the IRAS data. So they came up with the Tyche hypothesis of an object small enough that it wouldn't be detected by IRAS but still account for the comets. But now it appears that the perceived variations may just be statistical artifacts. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1494370 United States 08/05/2011 05:53 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | PIN THIS!!! mainstream confirmation that yes, there's a huge planet out there, bigger than jupiter, which we haven't observed yet, but which has a gravitational effect!!! Quoting: hoopity[link to www.scientificamerican.com] Scientists: big planet out there somewhere.A planet-size object could be behind the odd departure of some comets from the Oort Cloud--and toward us. They've known for quite some time that there is 'something' on the edge of the system with pull. Simply finding out what is the issue. I am curious to know how they think it's larger than Jupiter. Mass, Density has nothing to do with size, which causes effect..... |
Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 1454966 United States 08/05/2011 07:22 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Halcyon Dayz, FCD User ID: 1222987 Netherlands 08/05/2011 11:40 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | hello? this is the part of the article which is important. Quoting: hoopity Every so often a comet gets flung out of the Oort Cloud, a swarm of comets on the fringes of the solar system, and gets close enough to Earth for us to see it. But they don't seem to be scattered at random. Quoting: SA“There's an abundance of them around a great circle in the sky, and that suggests that there's something perturbing them in from this great circle.” you seem to be ignoring that in your reply. that's the whole point of this thread. That statistical anomaly is why the Tyche hypothesis was proposed in the first place. It is not NEW information. I never said it was doomey or woowoo. a little hard to follow you here sometimes. Quoting: hoopityYou're the one trying to link it to ancient myth, as if people's from antiquity could have known about this object. It doesn't get wooier then that. The Nemesis and Tyche Hypothesis aren't really related. Quoting: Halcyon Dayz, FCDThe Nemesis Hypothesis was proposed in the early 80s as an explanation for a perceived periodicity in extinction events. The Tyche Hypothesis was proposed in 1999 to explain a perceived irregularity in the origin points of long-period comets. But they are related. The Tyche hypothesis was in response to the fact that they didn't find Nemesis in the IRAS data. So they came up with the Tyche hypothesis of an object small enough that it wouldn't be detected by IRAS but still account for the comets. But now it appears that the perceived variations may just be statistical artifacts. Nemesis was supposed to dip in and out of the Oort cloud every 26 million year. This would explain the change in frequency of comets over geological time frames. Tyche is supposed to orbit inside the Oort cloud continuously scattering comets. This would explain why a more then average number of comets seem to originate from a single direction. Different solutions to different problems. What they have in common is the same kind of thinking. Astronomers have been trying to find trans-Neptunian objects by mathematical modelling ever since Neptune was discovered. See Hunt for Planet X [link to en.wikipedia.org] They've known for quite some time that there is 'something' on the edge of the system with pull. Simply finding out what is the issue. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1494370That notion had to be abandoned when the mass of Neptune became more accurately known. Neptune's orbit isn't measurable being perturbed. I am curious to know how they think it's larger than Jupiter. Mass, Density has nothing to do with size, which causes effect..... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1494370By larger they mean heavier. Mass causes gravity, and only gravity matters to the interaction between objects as far apart as the objects in the Oort cloud are. Reaching for the sky makes you taller. Hi! My name is Halcyon Dayz and I'm addicted to morans. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1389124 United States 08/05/2011 03:33 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1501943 United States 09/12/2011 03:05 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
saturn12 User ID: 1473298 United States 09/12/2011 04:22 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |