Godlike Productions - Discussion Forum
Users Online Now: 1,983 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 1,801,182
Pageviews Today: 2,649,222Threads Today: 722Posts Today: 14,991
09:31 PM


Rate this Thread

Absolute BS Crap Reasonable Nice Amazing
 

**BREAKING** Christie Considering Presidential Bid - White House Food Budget to Go Up, but He'll Balance the Budget

 
CaptainSensible
Offer Upgrade

User ID: 2221573
United States
09/29/2011 11:59 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
**BREAKING** Christie Considering Presidential Bid - White House Food Budget to Go Up, but He'll Balance the Budget
Hellz yeah that's what we need. A fat mean son of a bitch to take on the special interests, choke slam Pelosi and the Democrats and their spend happy ways, and get the budget balanced again.

He miraculously did it in NJ, a traditionally libtard overspending Democratic state, so it will be easy for him to balance the US's budget.

All hail the great governor of NJ! Take down Obama and Pelosi, no more tripling of the national deficit rate!

[link to www.nypost.com]

Last Edited by CaptainSensible on 09/29/2011 12:00 PM
"I once put instant coffee in the microwave... I almost went back in time."

"I do not see coincidence, I see Providence."

"To the mind that is still, the whole universe surrenders."
CaptainSensible  (OP)

User ID: 2221573
United States
09/29/2011 12:15 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: **BREAKING** Christie Considering Presidential Bid - White House Food Budget to Go Up, but He'll Balance the Budget
Ron Paul's a great man, but who knows if he'll ever be able to win with MSM conspiring against him.

We need someone who'll eat the MSM's lunch, literally!
"I once put instant coffee in the microwave... I almost went back in time."

"I do not see coincidence, I see Providence."

"To the mind that is still, the whole universe surrenders."
anonymous321

User ID: 1544839
United States
09/29/2011 12:43 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: **BREAKING** Christie Considering Presidential Bid - White House Food Budget to Go Up, but He'll Balance the Budget
Hellz yeah that's what we need. A fat mean son of a bitch to take on the special interests, choke slam Pelosi and the Democrats and their spend happy ways, and get the budget balanced again.

He miraculously did it in NJ, a traditionally libtard overspending Democratic state, so it will be easy for him to balance the US's budget.

All hail the great governor of NJ! Take down Obama and Pelosi, no more tripling of the national deficit rate!

[link to www.nypost.com]
 Quoting: CaptainSensible

clappa
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1185535
United States
09/29/2011 12:49 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: **BREAKING** Christie Considering Presidential Bid - White House Food Budget to Go Up, but He'll Balance the Budget
If RP doesn't get the nomination then many of us will vote 3rd party whether he's running independent or not. Repubs will still lose to Obama (just like the last election, John McShame, really?). If you like Paul's platform then NONE of the other repub candidates will do and are just as bad as Obama in our eyes. And there are more Paul supporters than ever.

We vote principles over party. So, repubs, GET SOME PRINCIPLES. It's our line in the sand. We refuse to vote for slick hpv rick, corporations are people and healthcare mandates are good romney, people who question the fed reserve are stupid and i used to work there cain, israel over america bachmann, etc. Disgusting lot.

If repubs lose to Obama because they refused to nominate Paul it's their own fault. Don't blame the third party supporters for having principles and choosing to vote our conscience. We don't "owe" any party our vote and if you put up a loser it's your own darn fault.

As for Christie:

We ARE the leader in Libya; we MUST be the world's police
Q: Does American have to be the world's policemen? Would you like to see a spreading of that load going forward where America's not the go-to country? For military support, for helping out with despotic regimes and so on?

Q: Well, America's always got to be the leader in that regard.

Q: Does it have to be?

A: I think it does.

A: I mean, look at Libya and the way Pres. Obama dealt with that. You know, he quite deliberately decided America wasn't going to be the leader.

A: But we really are. Let's face it, we are. He's calling the shots. and we all know that. And so let's not be kidding because they call it something different. America's taken the responsibility. Now, do I think there has to be shared sacrifice among other nations in the world who want a stable and secure world? Absolutely, there has to be. But I don't think that America can ever abdicate its leadership role in the world because of who we are & where we've come from. We are the symbol for the world for freedom & liberty.

[link to www.issues2000.org]





GLP