Newt and the Bill of Rights - "advice to civil libertarians" on the new "VERY aggressive anti-terrorism agency" raises questions | |
Laura Bow (OP) User ID: 1158661 United States 12/29/2011 09:03 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Laura Bow (OP) User ID: 1158661 United States 12/29/2011 09:07 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Ballin' on Welfare User ID: 1537656 United States 12/29/2011 09:23 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Newt and the Bill of Rights - "advice to civil libertarians" on the new "VERY aggressive anti-terrorism agency" raises questions So he just wants to hire some CIA guys for his "special" team. LIVE YOUR LIFE Follow God, Not a book. God is Love, God is Light. Love is the secret of the universe. [link to www.gizoogle.com] Fo all you beotches who wanna find shiznit. Google something for me called 2 kids 1 sandbox. Very cute video! |
MLI User ID: 677643 United States 12/29/2011 09:25 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 7902249 Canada 12/29/2011 09:26 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Laura Bow (OP) User ID: 1158661 United States 12/29/2011 09:33 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 7902249 Canada 12/29/2011 09:33 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
TyWebb User ID: 5275899 United States 12/29/2011 09:35 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Newt and the Bill of Rights - "advice to civil libertarians" on the new "VERY aggressive anti-terrorism agency" raises questions Hitler had his "small, but very aggressive" team. The SS. Mussolini had an elite unit. Pinochet had one, as did most other central and south american dictators. For a presumed historian, Gingrich is a real dumbass when it comes to understanding the historical precedents of small but extremely aggressive elite units within government. Newt frankly scares the shit of out of me. I'll be sending money to Mittens (vomited in my mouth typing that), before I vote for Newt. |
Laura Bow (OP) User ID: 1158661 United States 12/29/2011 09:37 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Newt and the Bill of Rights - "advice to civil libertarians" on the new "VERY aggressive anti-terrorism agency" raises questions Hitler had his "small, but very aggressive" team. The SS. Quoting: TyWebb Mussolini had an elite unit. Pinochet had one, as did most other central and south american dictators. For a presumed historian, Gingrich is a real dumbass when it comes to understanding the historical precedents of small but extremely aggressive elite units within government. Newt frankly scares the shit of out of me. I'll be sending money to Mittens (vomited in my mouth typing that), before I vote for Newt. Can I ask why you wouldn't consider Ron Paul? Not trying to cause controversy, btw, just like to know people's reasonings. To me, Romney is no better. Gingrich scares me too, actually probably more than Obama because it seems that Newt just would do something out of sheer anger or retaliation. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 7644552 Canada 12/29/2011 09:47 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 3702145 United States 12/29/2011 09:50 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Newt and the Bill of Rights - "advice to civil libertarians" on the new "VERY aggressive anti-terrorism agency" raises questions December 29, 2011 Quoting: Laura Bow Newt and the Bill of Rights Jason McNew Average Americans increasingly are realizing that our national difficulties are the direct results of not following our own laws -- specifically the Constitution. In light of recent Congressional actions ostensibly undermining Habeas Corpus and Posse Comitatus, statements like this by a presidential candidate need serious scrutiny. "And again, I'm going to be a little controversial. I would divide the FBI into two agencies. I would have an anti-domestic crime FBI, which was very cautious, very respectful of civil liberties. You are innocent until proven guilty. And I would have a small, but VERY aggressive anti-terrorism agency. And I would, frankly, give them extraordinary ability to eavesdrop and my first advice to civil libertarians is simple: don't plot with terrorists." More of the article at [link to www.americanthinker.com] Here is the video: So, how many of you think that Newt would use the NDAA bill to his advantage? Raise your hands, lol. Here's where I outlined someone who may be deemed a potential terrorist, back before the bill passed - Thread: Anyone who doesn't think that the s.1867 detention bill WON'T be an issue, look at this! You CAN be considered extremist if you post on GLP! He's America's worst Republican Presidential candidate. If he gets into office, I'm moving to Zimbabwe. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1535422 United States 12/29/2011 09:59 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Newt and the Bill of Rights - "advice to civil libertarians" on the new "VERY aggressive anti-terrorism agency" raises questions Newt scares me. After all the corruption and the betrayal of the 90's and his contract with America, how can ANYONE take this nut seriously? They call Ron Paul a nut, but he's perfectly sane compared to this retard. |
Laura Bow (OP) User ID: 1158661 United States 12/29/2011 10:08 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Newt and the Bill of Rights - "advice to civil libertarians" on the new "VERY aggressive anti-terrorism agency" raises questions Newt scares me. After all the corruption and the betrayal of the 90's and his contract with America, how can ANYONE take this nut seriously? Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1535422 They call Ron Paul a nut, but he's perfectly sane compared to this retard. I think out of all the candidates, HE'D be most likely to push any laws to the extreme in hunting down "terrorists". |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1574021 United States 12/29/2011 10:24 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 3702145 United States 12/29/2011 10:27 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 7902249 Canada 12/29/2011 10:28 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 7902671 United States 12/29/2011 10:54 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Laura Bow (OP) User ID: 1158661 United States 12/29/2011 10:56 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Laura Bow (OP) User ID: 1158661 United States 12/29/2011 11:03 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Newt and the Bill of Rights - "advice to civil libertarians" on the new "VERY aggressive anti-terrorism agency" raises questions Related thread...looks like this stuff may be piecing together bit by bit... Thread: Ron Paul Supporters, Including Veterans, are “Indecent” according to Newt Gingrich |
Laura Bow (OP) User ID: 1158661 United States 12/29/2011 11:17 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 7847197 India 12/29/2011 11:26 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Newt and the Bill of Rights - "advice to civil libertarians" on the new "VERY aggressive anti-terrorism agency" raises questions Ah.. you mean he is a Thomist! [link to www.scrollpublishing.com] Summa Theologica, trans. by Fathers of English Dominican Province (New York: Benziger Brothers, Inc., 1947), II, 1226-1227. A. REGULATIONS OF THE SYNOD OF TOULOUSE CONCERNING THE INQUISITION, 1229 people of good reputation to diligently, faithfully, and often search out heretics in their parishes, individual suspicious houses, subterranean rooms and additions to houses, and other hiding places. If they discover a heretic, follower, patron, or protector of heretics, they must, taking precaution that they do not escape, quickly notify the bishop and mayor of the place or his bailiff so they will be duly punished Adolph was a Thomist too! |
Laura Bow (OP) User ID: 1158661 United States 12/29/2011 11:28 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Newt and the Bill of Rights - "advice to civil libertarians" on the new "VERY aggressive anti-terrorism agency" raises questions Ah.. you mean he is a Thomist! Quoting: Anonymous Coward 7847197 [link to www.scrollpublishing.com] Summa Theologica, trans. by Fathers of English Dominican Province (New York: Benziger Brothers, Inc., 1947), II, 1226-1227. A. REGULATIONS OF THE SYNOD OF TOULOUSE CONCERNING THE INQUISITION, 1229 people of good reputation to diligently, faithfully, and often search out heretics in their parishes, individual suspicious houses, subterranean rooms and additions to houses, and other hiding places. If they discover a heretic, follower, patron, or protector of heretics, they must, taking precaution that they do not escape, quickly notify the bishop and mayor of the place or his bailiff so they will be duly punished Adolph was a Thomist too! Wow... |
ScottFlex User ID: 5764516 United States 12/29/2011 11:52 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Newt and the Bill of Rights - "advice to civil libertarians" on the new "VERY aggressive anti-terrorism agency" raises questions The Newt needs weight watchers to monitor his food intake... "We must all hang together or surely we will all hang separately." -Benjamin Franklin "Anything you can't say no to is your master, whether its a common addiction or an abusive government..." -ScottFlex |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 7909961 United Kingdom 12/29/2011 12:02 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Newt and the Bill of Rights - "advice to civil libertarians" on the new "VERY aggressive anti-terrorism agency" raises questions Newt is worse than Obama. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 7902249 Obama is a puppet, Newt is just pure insider evil piece of shit... Bush, Clinton and Obama had the same mandates from the evil 1)keep our country at war creating more Islamic regimes 2)bankrupting our country 3)passing and sneaking through the necessary laws ALL SO THE NEXT ONE CAN BRING IT TO FRUITION |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1517703 United States 12/29/2011 12:05 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Newt and the Bill of Rights - "advice to civil libertarians" on the new "VERY aggressive anti-terrorism agency" raises questions December 29, 2011 Quoting: Laura Bow Newt and the Bill of Rights Jason McNew Average Americans increasingly are realizing that our national difficulties are the direct results of not following our own laws -- specifically the Constitution. In light of recent Congressional actions ostensibly undermining Habeas Corpus and Posse Comitatus, statements like this by a presidential candidate need serious scrutiny. "And again, I'm going to be a little controversial. I would divide the FBI into two agencies. I would have an anti-domestic crime FBI, which was very cautious, very respectful of civil liberties. You are innocent until proven guilty. And I would have a small, but VERY aggressive anti-terrorism agency. And I would, frankly, give them extraordinary ability to eavesdrop and my first advice to civil libertarians is simple: don't plot with terrorists." * * * * sounds like a very antiamerican agenda..... how many american terrorists do they put in jail each day...each year.... less than five per year... big hairy deal. newt is an idiot! More of the article at [link to www.americanthinker.com] Here is the video: So, how many of you think that Newt would use the NDAA bill to his advantage? Raise your hands, lol. Here's where I outlined someone who may be deemed a potential terrorist, back before the bill passed - Thread: Anyone who doesn't think that the s.1867 detention bill WON'T be an issue, look at this! You CAN be considered extremist if you post on GLP! |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 961432 United States 12/29/2011 12:11 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Newt and the Bill of Rights - "advice to civil libertarians" on the new "VERY aggressive anti-terrorism agency" raises questions And I would have a small, but VERY aggressive anti-terrorism agency. And I would, frankly, give them extraordinary ability to eavesdrop and my first advice to civil libertarians is simple: don't plot with terrorists." Quoting: Laura Bow This guy is a nutcase, I suppose everyone is guilty until proven innocent in his mind and he ultimately determines guilt. I suppose believing in natural rights is guilt according to Newt while lying in bed with every bankster, corporate crook and crony in America is just politics. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1517703 United States 12/29/2011 12:12 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Laura Bow (OP) User ID: 1158661 United States 12/29/2011 12:13 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Newt and the Bill of Rights - "advice to civil libertarians" on the new "VERY aggressive anti-terrorism agency" raises questions * * * * Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1517703 sounds like a very antiamerican agenda..... how many american terrorists do they put in jail each day...each year.... less than five per year... big hairy deal. newt is an idiot! Actually, you raise a very good point. How many terrorists have been American citizens versus those who are not? Are there any stats on this? |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 7644552 Canada 12/29/2011 12:20 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
BBQ Guy User ID: 1410244 United States 12/29/2011 12:40 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Newt and the Bill of Rights - "advice to civil libertarians" on the new "VERY aggressive anti-terrorism agency" raises questions Read his book, he is a pure Globalist and could care less about the bottom feeders. "If Tyranny and Oppression come to this land, it will be in the guise of fighting a foreign enemy"- James Madison "Joining the military does not mean that you will be defending the country. The purpose of the U.S. military should be to defend the United States. Period. Yet, one of the greatest myths ever invented is that the current U.S. military somehow defends our freedoms. First of all, our freedoms are not in danger of being taken away by foreign countries; if they are taken away it will be by our own government. It is not a country making war on us that we need to fear, it is our government making war on the Bill of Rights. And second, how is stationing troops in 150 different regions of the world on hundreds of U.S. military bases defending our freedoms? It is not the purpose of the U.S. military to change regimes, secure the borders of other countries, or spread democracy at gunpoint. The Department of Defense should first and foremost be the Department of Homeland Security."--Laurence Vance-- |