Godlike Productions - Discussion Forum
Users Online Now: 1,388 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 442,803
Pageviews Today: 571,172Threads Today: 175Posts Today: 2,014
05:00 AM


Rate this Thread

Absolute BS Crap Reasonable Nice Amazing
 

Newt and the Bill of Rights - "advice to civil libertarians" on the new "VERY aggressive anti-terrorism agency" raises questions

 
Laura Bow
Offer Upgrade

User ID: 1158661
United States
12/29/2011 08:49 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Newt and the Bill of Rights - "advice to civil libertarians" on the new "VERY aggressive anti-terrorism agency" raises questions
December 29, 2011
Newt and the Bill of Rights
Jason McNew

Average Americans increasingly are realizing that our national difficulties are the direct results of not following our own laws -- specifically the Constitution. In light of recent Congressional actions ostensibly undermining Habeas Corpus and Posse Comitatus, statements like this by a presidential candidate need serious scrutiny.

"And again, I'm going to be a little controversial. I would divide the FBI into two agencies. I would have an anti-domestic crime FBI, which was very cautious, very respectful of civil liberties. You are innocent until proven guilty. And I would have a small, but VERY aggressive anti-terrorism agency. And I would, frankly, give them extraordinary ability to eavesdrop and my first advice to civil libertarians is simple: don't plot with terrorists."


More of the article at [link to www.americanthinker.com]

Here is the video:




So, how many of you think that Newt would use the NDAA bill to his advantage? Raise your hands, lol. Here's where I outlined someone who may be deemed a potential terrorist, back before the bill passed -

Thread: Anyone who doesn't think that the s.1867 detention bill WON'T be an issue, look at this! You CAN be considered extremist if you post on GLP!

Last Edited by Laura Bow on 12/29/2011 09:32 AM
Laura Bow  (OP)

User ID: 1158661
United States
12/29/2011 09:03 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Newt and the Bill of Rights - "advice to civil libertarians" on the new "VERY aggressive anti-terrorism agency" raises questions
bump
Laura Bow  (OP)

User ID: 1158661
United States
12/29/2011 09:07 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Newt and the Bill of Rights - "advice to civil libertarians" on the new "VERY aggressive anti-terrorism agency" raises questions
Some of the comments on that article are disturbing, considering who the government is looking at more and more as "terrorists", ie. the average individual.
Ballin' on Welfare

User ID: 1537656
United States
12/29/2011 09:23 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Newt and the Bill of Rights - "advice to civil libertarians" on the new "VERY aggressive anti-terrorism agency" raises questions
So he just wants to hire some CIA guys for his "special" team.
LIVE YOUR LIFE
Follow God, Not a book.
God is Love, God is Light.
Love is the secret of the universe.

[link to www.gizoogle.com]

Fo all you beotches who wanna find shiznit.

Google something for me called 2 kids 1 sandbox. Very cute video!
MLI
User ID: 677643
United States
12/29/2011 09:25 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Newt and the Bill of Rights - "advice to civil libertarians" on the new "VERY aggressive anti-terrorism agency" raises questions
5* and a bump
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 7902249
Canada
12/29/2011 09:26 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Newt and the Bill of Rights - "advice to civil libertarians" on the new "VERY aggressive anti-terrorism agency" raises questions
What a piece of shit.
Laura Bow  (OP)

User ID: 1158661
United States
12/29/2011 09:33 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Newt and the Bill of Rights - "advice to civil libertarians" on the new "VERY aggressive anti-terrorism agency" raises questions
What a piece of shit.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 7902249


Just think though, he could be elected president....
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 7902249
Canada
12/29/2011 09:33 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Newt and the Bill of Rights - "advice to civil libertarians" on the new "VERY aggressive anti-terrorism agency" raises questions
Newt want his SS death squads.
TyWebb

User ID: 5275899
United States
12/29/2011 09:35 AM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Newt and the Bill of Rights - "advice to civil libertarians" on the new "VERY aggressive anti-terrorism agency" raises questions
Hitler had his "small, but very aggressive" team. The SS.

Mussolini had an elite unit. Pinochet had one, as did most other central and south american dictators.

For a presumed historian, Gingrich is a real dumbass when it comes to understanding the historical precedents of small but extremely aggressive elite units within government.

Newt frankly scares the shit of out of me. I'll be sending money to Mittens (vomited in my mouth typing that), before I vote for Newt.
Laura Bow  (OP)

User ID: 1158661
United States
12/29/2011 09:37 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Newt and the Bill of Rights - "advice to civil libertarians" on the new "VERY aggressive anti-terrorism agency" raises questions
Hitler had his "small, but very aggressive" team. The SS.

Mussolini had an elite unit. Pinochet had one, as did most other central and south american dictators.

For a presumed historian, Gingrich is a real dumbass when it comes to understanding the historical precedents of small but extremely aggressive elite units within government.

Newt frankly scares the shit of out of me. I'll be sending money to Mittens (vomited in my mouth typing that), before I vote for Newt.
 Quoting: TyWebb


Can I ask why you wouldn't consider Ron Paul? Not trying to cause controversy, btw, just like to know people's reasonings. To me, Romney is no better. Gingrich scares me too, actually probably more than Obama because it seems that Newt just would do something out of sheer anger or retaliation.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 7644552
Canada
12/29/2011 09:47 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Newt and the Bill of Rights - "advice to civil libertarians" on the new "VERY aggressive anti-terrorism agency" raises questions
Nazi Newt
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 3702145
United States
12/29/2011 09:50 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Newt and the Bill of Rights - "advice to civil libertarians" on the new "VERY aggressive anti-terrorism agency" raises questions
December 29, 2011
Newt and the Bill of Rights
Jason McNew

Average Americans increasingly are realizing that our national difficulties are the direct results of not following our own laws -- specifically the Constitution. In light of recent Congressional actions ostensibly undermining Habeas Corpus and Posse Comitatus, statements like this by a presidential candidate need serious scrutiny.

"And again, I'm going to be a little controversial. I would divide the FBI into two agencies. I would have an anti-domestic crime FBI, which was very cautious, very respectful of civil liberties. You are innocent until proven guilty. And I would have a small, but VERY aggressive anti-terrorism agency. And I would, frankly, give them extraordinary ability to eavesdrop and my first advice to civil libertarians is simple: don't plot with terrorists."


More of the article at [link to www.americanthinker.com]

Here is the video:




So, how many of you think that Newt would use the NDAA bill to his advantage? Raise your hands, lol. Here's where I outlined someone who may be deemed a potential terrorist, back before the bill passed -

Thread: Anyone who doesn't think that the s.1867 detention bill WON'T be an issue, look at this! You CAN be considered extremist if you post on GLP!
 Quoting: Laura Bow


He's America's worst Republican Presidential candidate. If he gets into office, I'm moving to Zimbabwe.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1535422
United States
12/29/2011 09:59 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Newt and the Bill of Rights - "advice to civil libertarians" on the new "VERY aggressive anti-terrorism agency" raises questions
Newt scares me. After all the corruption and the betrayal of the 90's and his contract with America, how can ANYONE take this nut seriously?

They call Ron Paul a nut, but he's perfectly sane compared to this retard.
Laura Bow  (OP)

User ID: 1158661
United States
12/29/2011 10:08 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Newt and the Bill of Rights - "advice to civil libertarians" on the new "VERY aggressive anti-terrorism agency" raises questions
Newt scares me. After all the corruption and the betrayal of the 90's and his contract with America, how can ANYONE take this nut seriously?

They call Ron Paul a nut, but he's perfectly sane compared to this retard.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1535422


I think out of all the candidates, HE'D be most likely to push any laws to the extreme in hunting down "terrorists".
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1574021
United States
12/29/2011 10:24 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Newt and the Bill of Rights - "advice to civil libertarians" on the new "VERY aggressive anti-terrorism agency" raises questions
He's America's worst Republican Presidential candidate. If he gets into office, I'm moving to Zimbabwe.


You might not be able to since we are going to into africa lol
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 3702145
United States
12/29/2011 10:27 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Newt and the Bill of Rights - "advice to civil libertarians" on the new "VERY aggressive anti-terrorism agency" raises questions
He's America's worst Republican Presidential candidate. If he gets into office, I'm moving to Zimbabwe.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1574021


You might not be able to since we are going to into africa lol


Good point! LOL I had forgotten about that, I can't keep up with all the incursions these days.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 7902249
Canada
12/29/2011 10:28 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Newt and the Bill of Rights - "advice to civil libertarians" on the new "VERY aggressive anti-terrorism agency" raises questions
Newt is worse than Obama.

Obama is a puppet, Newt is just pure insider evil piece of shit...
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 7902671
United States
12/29/2011 10:54 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Newt and the Bill of Rights - "advice to civil libertarians" on the new "VERY aggressive anti-terrorism agency" raises questions
Nazi Newt
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 7644552


he could be called "neocon newt".

big it's not much difference amongst baby killer warmongers.
Laura Bow  (OP)

User ID: 1158661
United States
12/29/2011 10:56 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Newt and the Bill of Rights - "advice to civil libertarians" on the new "VERY aggressive anti-terrorism agency" raises questions
Newt is worse than Obama.

Obama is a puppet, Newt is just pure insider evil piece of shit...
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 7902249


Go look at some of the comments on there, it's amazing that there are people that think this is actually a GOOD IDEA!!
Laura Bow  (OP)

User ID: 1158661
United States
12/29/2011 11:03 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Newt and the Bill of Rights - "advice to civil libertarians" on the new "VERY aggressive anti-terrorism agency" raises questions
Related thread...looks like this stuff may be piecing together bit by bit...

Thread: Ron Paul Supporters, Including Veterans, are “Indecent” according to Newt Gingrich
Laura Bow  (OP)

User ID: 1158661
United States
12/29/2011 11:17 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Newt and the Bill of Rights - "advice to civil libertarians" on the new "VERY aggressive anti-terrorism agency" raises questions
bump
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 7847197
India
12/29/2011 11:26 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Newt and the Bill of Rights - "advice to civil libertarians" on the new "VERY aggressive anti-terrorism agency" raises questions
Ah.. you mean he is a Thomist!

[link to www.scrollpublishing.com]

Summa Theologica, trans. by Fathers of English Dominican Province (New York: Benziger Brothers, Inc., 1947), II, 1226-1227. A. REGULATIONS OF THE SYNOD OF TOULOUSE CONCERNING THE INQUISITION, 1229 people of good reputation to diligently, faithfully, and often search out heretics in their parishes, individual suspicious houses, subterranean rooms and additions to houses, and other hiding places. If they discover a heretic, follower, patron, or protector of heretics, they must, taking precaution that they do not escape, quickly notify the bishop and mayor of the place or his bailiff so they will be duly punished

Adolph was a Thomist too!
Laura Bow  (OP)

User ID: 1158661
United States
12/29/2011 11:28 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Newt and the Bill of Rights - "advice to civil libertarians" on the new "VERY aggressive anti-terrorism agency" raises questions
Ah.. you mean he is a Thomist!

[link to www.scrollpublishing.com]

Summa Theologica, trans. by Fathers of English Dominican Province (New York: Benziger Brothers, Inc., 1947), II, 1226-1227. A. REGULATIONS OF THE SYNOD OF TOULOUSE CONCERNING THE INQUISITION, 1229 people of good reputation to diligently, faithfully, and often search out heretics in their parishes, individual suspicious houses, subterranean rooms and additions to houses, and other hiding places. If they discover a heretic, follower, patron, or protector of heretics, they must, taking precaution that they do not escape, quickly notify the bishop and mayor of the place or his bailiff so they will be duly punished

Adolph was a Thomist too!
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 7847197


Wow...
ScottFlex

User ID: 5764516
United States
12/29/2011 11:52 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Newt and the Bill of Rights - "advice to civil libertarians" on the new "VERY aggressive anti-terrorism agency" raises questions
The Newt needs weight watchers to monitor his food intake...
"We must all hang together or surely we will all hang separately."

-Benjamin Franklin

"Anything you can't say no to is your master, whether its a common addiction or an abusive government..."

-ScottFlex
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 7909961
United Kingdom
12/29/2011 12:02 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Newt and the Bill of Rights - "advice to civil libertarians" on the new "VERY aggressive anti-terrorism agency" raises questions
Newt is worse than Obama.

Obama is a puppet, Newt is just pure insider evil piece of shit...
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 7902249


Bush, Clinton and Obama had the same mandates from the evil
1)keep our country at war creating more Islamic regimes
2)bankrupting our country
3)passing and sneaking through the necessary laws

ALL SO THE NEXT ONE CAN BRING IT TO FRUITION
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1517703
United States
12/29/2011 12:05 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Newt and the Bill of Rights - "advice to civil libertarians" on the new "VERY aggressive anti-terrorism agency" raises questions
December 29, 2011
Newt and the Bill of Rights
Jason McNew

Average Americans increasingly are realizing that our national difficulties are the direct results of not following our own laws -- specifically the Constitution. In light of recent Congressional actions ostensibly undermining Habeas Corpus and Posse Comitatus, statements like this by a presidential candidate need serious scrutiny.

"And again, I'm going to be a little controversial. I would divide the FBI into two agencies. I would have an anti-domestic crime FBI, which was very cautious, very respectful of civil liberties. You are innocent until proven guilty. And I would have a small, but VERY aggressive anti-terrorism agency. And I would, frankly, give them extraordinary ability to eavesdrop and my first advice to civil libertarians is simple: don't plot with terrorists."

* * * *

sounds like a very antiamerican agenda.....


how many american terrorists do they put in jail each day...each year.... less than five per year...


big hairy deal.


newt is an idiot!

More of the article at [link to www.americanthinker.com]

Here is the video:




So, how many of you think that Newt would use the NDAA bill to his advantage? Raise your hands, lol. Here's where I outlined someone who may be deemed a potential terrorist, back before the bill passed -

Thread: Anyone who doesn't think that the s.1867 detention bill WON'T be an issue, look at this! You CAN be considered extremist if you post on GLP!
 Quoting: Laura Bow
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 961432
United States
12/29/2011 12:11 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Newt and the Bill of Rights - "advice to civil libertarians" on the new "VERY aggressive anti-terrorism agency" raises questions
And I would have a small, but VERY aggressive anti-terrorism agency. And I would, frankly, give them extraordinary ability to eavesdrop and my first advice to civil libertarians is simple: don't plot with terrorists."

 Quoting: Laura Bow


gasp

This guy is a nutcase, I suppose everyone is guilty until proven innocent in his mind and he ultimately determines guilt. I suppose believing in natural rights is guilt according to Newt while lying in bed with every bankster, corporate crook and crony in America is just politics.

crazy
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1517703
United States
12/29/2011 12:12 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Newt and the Bill of Rights - "advice to civil libertarians" on the new "VERY aggressive anti-terrorism agency" raises questions
Very antiAmerican .... very


newt is just a fart in the wind.... smells bad but will eventually go away...
Laura Bow  (OP)

User ID: 1158661
United States
12/29/2011 12:13 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Newt and the Bill of Rights - "advice to civil libertarians" on the new "VERY aggressive anti-terrorism agency" raises questions
* * * *

sounds like a very antiamerican agenda.....


how many american terrorists do they put in jail each day...each year.... less than five per year...


big hairy deal.


newt is an idiot!


 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1517703


Actually, you raise a very good point. How many terrorists have been American citizens versus those who are not? Are there any stats on this?
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 7644552
Canada
12/29/2011 12:20 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Newt and the Bill of Rights - "advice to civil libertarians" on the new "VERY aggressive anti-terrorism agency" raises questions
numbnuts newt
BBQ Guy

User ID: 1410244
United States
12/29/2011 12:40 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Newt and the Bill of Rights - "advice to civil libertarians" on the new "VERY aggressive anti-terrorism agency" raises questions
Read his book, he is a pure Globalist and could care less about the bottom feeders.
"If Tyranny and Oppression come to this land, it will be in the guise of fighting a foreign enemy"- James Madison

"Joining the military does not mean that you will be defending the country. The purpose of the U.S. military should be to defend the United States. Period. Yet, one of the greatest myths ever invented is that the current U.S. military somehow defends our freedoms. First of all, our freedoms are not in danger of being taken away by foreign countries; if they are taken away it will be by our own government. It is not a country making war on us that we need to fear, it is our government making war on the Bill of Rights. And second, how is stationing troops in 150 different regions of the world on hundreds of U.S. military bases defending our freedoms? It is not the purpose of the U.S. military to change regimes, secure the borders of other countries, or spread democracy at gunpoint. The Department of Defense should first and foremost be the Department of Homeland Security."--Laurence Vance--





GLP