Why IPv6 (Internet Protocol version 6) will be launched worldwide on 6/6 ??? Something related to 666?

Countdown to June 6 IPv6 Transition Begins at Google:

[link to www.dailytech.com]

World IPv6 launch day set for June 6th, 2012; Google, Facebook, and AT&T among supporters:

[link to www.theverge.com]




Internet to deploy IPv6 from June 6, 2012:

[link to www.dailyhostnews.com]

:african:

Venus transits the sun that day.

Hey bankrupt spammer, already get a visa to Angola?

Ready to flee your shithole?

Good point!!!

Cheers

So, IP version 6, on 6/6...

They could have choose May 6, or June 7...

I guess that nobody can "buy or sell" without the internet nowadays?

Only if you believe or accept that to be true.

the responsibility of government is to take all discernable choices and make sure that the only ones that are readily apparent serve the organizations will.

Wake up, people.

If you want 666 to be something, it will be something...

When it starts to appear everywhere, in a way that EVERYONE can see, not just me, is it just a coincidence?

Related thread:

Thread: You should know that two important economic indicators had a multi-year "bottom" during this current recession of 666 points.

More coincidence?

How about the carbon atom? It can't get any more real than that. But, what is the significance?

maybe because of alliteration - IP 6 (a big move for all techies all over the world - requires downtime) on 6/6 (because 6 and 6 are a catchy way to remember?)

Probably...

Lol, two ideas to convince you that Bill Gates is a tool and not the machine. Firstly, he never foresaw the need for harddrives larger then a few megabytes. Also, he did not invest much in the Idea or the significance of the Internet.

Of course.

IPv6 means static IP for everyone like house number. they know why they do it.

bullshit. ipv6 uses dhcp just like v4. stupid much?

Yes and that variable given out as a dynamic is hosted on top of a hardware MAC address. Static numbers have been around as Identifiers for quite a while smart guy.

When you think ,try to ascertain all the layers.

nat, of course, obfuscates the underlying mac addresses. layer 3 can disentangle but only governments have the resources and it isn't widely practiced. it also requires you have routing enabled at the point of nat.

if you don't know how to anonomize thats fine but don't try and say everything is static. its only static for the ignorant.

Nodal address verification, unless one may be simultaneously uploading through independantly serialized cellular interfaces placed in multiple locations is practically instantaneous.

Even PPTP and like burrowing protocols can be traced to point of origin simply by line interchanges.

All I said was tracing was simple and you are only as anonymous as the information you transmit is insignificant.

layer 2 to layer 3 translation (like pptp to circuits) is only available to agencies like the nsa. if you're doing something to provoke them there is nothing that can save you.

that does not make things static. packet routing is highly dynamic.

It is as dynamic as routing tables in your local routers. I try not to speak out of my ass. Do you know the reassemblage data in the head or close footer variables of a data stream? I used to piss off hackers to test the programming of our borderware fireboxes, very few, if any but one didn't get tracked to their home.

I am not the NSA

post my external and device ip's and i'll gladly acknowledge your prowess. I'll roll them from this ac number, and respond if you get them right.