Mainstream News Site Announces Energy Breakthrough

they announce a breakthrough from time to time but it never mainstreams
probably vaporware.

Good. www.thrivemovement.com

true lies

And they will all be dead by the end of the month. Oil companies don't like competition.

They have announced 100's of so called breakthroughs over the years, none of them actuallly made it to the market. This one is no different. It's just a ploy to keep peoples hopes up and steal their money while they are still filling the tanks of their gasgusslers.

Just like when they created an alternate fuel source to replace oil applications such as Gasoline. It was suppose to be a salt water engine that makes the salt combustible and reliable clean energy. Plus not to mention we have about 97% salt water on this planet.

this is era pf peak oil so these types of discoveries have to be announced.
global oil supplies are in severe decline despite all the claims.
nobody have verified oil fields of saudi arabia,iran etc.
nothing can replace crude oil,nothing.
even coal is not perfect anwer because you have to burn huge quantities of coal to produce energy
nuclear power is 10-100 times costly than crude oil..so it will not be economical
start planning your future

there could be free energy for everyone on earth, there have been talks about it since the 70's, the sheeple have no idea about it.

the only problem is, governments would not make money
electric companies would not make money.

so its not going to happen this lifetime....

All energy technologies will be opposed by oil companies.

It is the mechanism on the market know as competitive deselection which in short states that the only decision factor on the market is maximization of difference between money input and output.

Scarce energy source - huge money input to the companies.

Except more crude oil, that is...
[link to www.usnews.com]

All energy technologies will be opposed by oil companies with everything they got , and they got a lot even means icluding assassination.

It will happen because it is how "fee" market forces works.

So the whole company was created to keep peoples hopes up?

Or are you saying it was a ploy to eventually sell the technology to the oil companies, either voluntarily or through coercion, so as never see the light of day and have no impact on humanity?

"Observations support that hydrinos is the identity of the dark matter of the universe."

Interesting claim

so basically...

he's created a fuel cell. but instead of turning oxygen and hydrogen into electricty...

he uses a catalyst to turn water vapor into...

hydrinos and oxygen. And the released energy is harnessed into electrical energy.

do i have this correct?

Electricity generated from water? WTF, who would have ever thought of that. Maybe someone should build a dam or something.

This thread is like an intelligence test. If you responded to it, assuming that it was true, that a "Mainstream News Site Announces Energy Breakthrough" then you've failed the test.

In case you're confused, and I assume if you believed this you are frequently confused, this was not a bit of news, but a "Press Release".

Websites like Market Watch (and ADVFN and a million others) publish corporate press releases without in fact testing that they are true. For extremely obvious reasons.

To protect themselves they clearly label them as "Press Release".

So how'd you do? Did you pass or fail?

PRNEWSWIRE lol

You know it's nothing but PAID ADVERTISEMENT - right?

LOL!!!



Then...they need to really think about the long term ramifications of using water as a gasoline replacement. Seriously...think it through!!

Reminds me of Kent talking about this many years ago, why are trying so hard to convert things into hydrogen when water is full of it already.

[link to www.cyberspaceorbit.com]

Indians have nice men......

just means electricity will cost $20 per unit to have (justifies implementation of costly advanced tech).

It takes energy to turn water into hydrogen and oxygen. So theoretically we could have solar power plants that partly powered the electric grid, and stored energy in the form of hydrogen, to be transported. (gravity storage systems are the most efficient, safe, clean, etc for storing power. Almost 1-- percent efficiency)

However, its REALLY dangerous and uneconomical to transport hydrogen. That's the problem. It blows up. That's it.

So cars can't really run on water, or hydrogen.

Theoretically, all these claims about guys running cars on water... what they are claiming is that they did something to the water to make it burnable. Basically turning water into water-gasoline.

Why is this useful? Because its easy to transport.

However, it still takes energy to change the water into water-gasoline. You don't just magically get all this energy out of water. But the conversion process could happen at solar power plants.

There's another theory going around for using water. Catalyst theory. Basically there's LENR (colf fusion) claiming they use a catalyst to get some kind of energy from water. And then other people claiming if they could find the right catalyst and electrical resonance, then it actually takes less energy for hydrolysis than you get back.

I think the Catalyst theories hold a lot of promise as well. Catalysts are awesome. We use them in almost all useful chemical reactions anyway.

A catalyst is something that makes a reaction occur or occur better, without any detectable change to the catalyst.

nasa has been doing this for years up there.

So what we should do is use the worlds water supply to our liking by breaking apart the atoms that form the water and eventually lowering the amount of usable water on the planet.

Hydrogen and Oxygen don't only exist in water, but i guess the polar ice caps aren't really need anyways. might as well melt em, split up the water to keep the ocean water levels low, use sea salt in the foods, and see how long that will sustain us.

doomed....

Hydrogen from water vapor.
It's an energy sink.

[link to www.google.com]

Good, start burning off these oceans. More land & fresh water.

No invention to benefit the world of man,
Will exist till I got the money in my hand.

LOL, did any of you actually read it?

"operating over long duration at the 10 Watt (W) scale. A 100 W unit is planned for completion by the end of 2012, and a 1.5 kiloWatt (kW) pilot unit that can serve the residential power market, as an initial target commercial application, is expected to be operational by 2013. (One kW is equal to 1000 W, and 1.5 kW is the typical, average power consumption of a U.S. home"




Last Edited by BRIEF on 05/23/2012 08:35 AM

Sounds like a scam to me. MSM reporters don't know science,
they are easily fooled.