Found the video on the other thread, but i'm posting it here too for any sane person interested to keep up with what the lad is saying. Seems John sticks up with what he said last week and talks a lot about the planet X and what the govt is not telling us.
Zetas right again of course.
Moore is using Harrington's Planet X Orbit as his Threat? Seriously????
That crap was debunked ages ago. Here is Harrington's ACUAL ORBIT FROM HIS OWN PAPERS CONFIRMED BY THE VIDEOS.
I know mate, i'm very far from convinced by John meself, saw your video, i enjoy your informative posts too.
I just think that this thread is in a better mental state than the other one so far and posted John's video so we can continue to have a rational discussion about him, his sayings and his motives.
That's the problem when the only 'evidence' is some 'confidential insider'. Harrington's Orbital Elements have been Public FOREVER and anyone knowledgeable enough to use them have. Look at the Video, Harrington's Theoretical Orbit NEVER came inside Pluto and currently still has Planet X on it's OUTBOUND leg. There isn't any threat from Harrington's Theoretical Planet X, never has been, NEVER will be.
Here are some links;
Video of the 1990 Sitchin/Harrington Interview. Note at time 5:12 Harrington draws a COUNTER CLOCKWISE Planet X orbit OUTSIDE of Plutos orbit, and then places Planet X on the OUTBOUND leg. EXACTLY the same as the Theoretical orbit he published in 1988 that My video is based on: [
link to www.youtube.com]
The location of Harrington's Theoretical Planet X:
[
link to articles.adsabs.harvard.edu]
2002 Zecharia Sitchin Interview stating Nibiru will not return until 3,440 AD: Will Planet X / Nibiru Return in 2003? [
link to yowusa.com]
Dec/2011 Dr. Lorenzo Iorio paper stating a Mars-Sized body would have to be at least 150 to 200 AU away, "We analytically work out the long-term variations caused on the motion of a planet orbiting a star by a very distant, pointlike massive object X. Apart from the semi-major axis a, all the other Keplerian osculating orbital elements experience long-term variations which are complicated functions of the orbital configurations of both the planet itself and of X...": [
link to arxiv.org]
2012: No Planet X, "According to these publications, most of the IRAS observations in the 1984 paper were distant, ultra-luminous young galaxies and one was a filamentary structure known as "infrared cirrus" floating in intergalactic space. IRAS never observed any astronomical body in the outer reaches of the Solar System...": [
link to www.universetoday.com]
1983 Washington Post IRAS Article: [
link to planet-x.150m.com]
Unidentified IRAS sources - Ultrahigh-luminosity galaxies, "Optical imaging and spectroscopy measurements were obtained for six of the high galactic latitude infrared sources reported by Houck, et al. (1984) from the IRAS survey to have no obvious optical counterparts on the POSS prints. All are identified with visually faint galaxies that have total luminosities in the range 5 x 10 to the 11th power stellar luminosity to 5 x 10 to the 12th power stellar luminosity...": [
link to articles.adsabs.harvard.edu]
Planet X - No dynamical evidence in the optical observations ~ E. M Standish, Note that R.S. Gomes is mentioned in this 1993 Paper: [
link to adsabs.harvard.edu]
R.S. Gomes Speculation On Planet X #2: [
link to news.nationalgeographic.com]
Note, Similar Gomes Speculation From 2004: [
link to www.ucs.louisiana.edu]
Planet X #1 disproved: [
link to en.wikipedia.org]
Why I Killed Pluto & Why It Had It Coming - Mike Brown: [
link to www.keckobservatory.org]
Dr. John J. Matese on Tyche: [
link to www.ucs.louisiana.edu]
Can WISE Find the Hypothetical 'Tyche'?: [
link to www.jpl.nasa.gov]
List of Nearest Dwarf Stars: [
link to en.wikipedia.org]
WISE FAILS TO FIND TYCHE: [
link to www.jpl.nasa.gov]
