|
REPORT ABUSIVE REPLY
|
|
Message Subject
|
X Marks the Spot
|
|
Poster Handle
|
Azeratel Axo |
|
Post Content
|
we must remember that our old universe was ruled by gravity and the only noticeable gravity exists in close proximity to solid objects , example earth, gravity becomes unnoticeable 250 miles away from earth
thus in the old universe, when it was calculated the amount of volume (mass) of planets, stars, moons, asteroids and anything else than can be imagined existing possessing mass there was
it was discovered that to create the amount of gravitational force estimated required to keep the universe looking as we see and experience it, there is about 90% to 95% to little mass in total to achieve it
thus something required to be imagined that acted like mass (matter) and produced gravity affect
the imaginative answer was dark (invisible) matter thus the old universe preserved it`s gravitational affect to keep it in shape
if you are not looking for gravity to keep the universe in shape plasma in dark glow and consequential magnetic and electric forces do what gravity never has
Quoting: aether Personally I do not think it exists.  Quoting: Azeratel Axo the holy grail is to describe accurately the true set of ingredient that must exist to cause the singular affect(s) that are observed and experience thus their sequential functions must fit into their sequential structure luckily when we do it this time what we replicate is perpetual motion (eternity) which happily corresponds to the accurate structure of consciousness so this time we resolve a lot of historical issues in one affect  These things are intuitive for me, but I have a difficult time explaining them in my own words. i know the correct sequence of words to describe this has yet to be written in sequence that who needs to agree it, does agree it this one /z\ of the topics of this thread beta testing experience into visible explanation (word)  Indeed. I've often thought something similar: that words could be 'sharp' enough to pass through the ego. 'Power' tends to not cut it, whether in volume/implication of truth, or in repeated attempts at explanation...
|
|
|
Please verify you're human:
|
|
|
Reason for reporting:
|
