LMAO! Dumb shit Mitt Romeny introduces Paul Ryan as the "next president of the United States"

WOW.. HE'S DUMB.. Makes Biden look like Einstein..Boy are we screwed.

and your perfect-----?
you try public speaking. Most people would rather die than speak in front of crowds.. FACT

Duh,, make pubic statements , 365 days a year and see if you don't make a few mistakes.. Wow your a half a head,, go after the NWO puppet for something more tangible.. Asshat

You're not your dumb shit.

LOL

Paul Ryan BEGGING for Tax Payers BAILOUT. This is the fucker who is suppose to help the Economy? Begging Americans to Bailout FAILING CORPORATIONS?

[link to www.youtube.com]

Just another teleprompter reader.

Why would this DUMB SHIT even introduces Paul as the next VP or next President?

Why not just say he is Running Mate?

Does Romney already know who will steal the 2012 Election?

The US Electoral system has become a joke. It's not about who's qualified. But who's willing to follow the script.

Barrak Hussein Obama is a Kenyan Marxist riding dirty on us.

Barrak the homo did the same thing dumb ass!!

I thought he did that on purpose so the crowd could get a laugh.

[link to www.youtube.com]

Of corse that has never happened before. Oh wait, when Obama introduced Biden he did the EXACT same thing. So much for your guy being so much smarter.

Paul Ryan will rip Biden a new one.

ridicule can only take you so far.

Here is a novel idea, why don't you find something positive to say for a change..

Beware of Liars and abettors in the media, blogs and government, posting on behalf of the Obama administration, using their Alinsky-style ridicule of those questioning Obama’s accomplishments or shortcomings . It is a tired old scam .

Instead of ridicule can’t you folks cite any real progress or accomplishments that Obama has made? And PLEASE don’t cite social programs that have only compromised our National Security by making us that more in debt to our enemies who hold our debt.

Debt today $ 15, 918,265,798,999.00

and while you are at it, put down the book Rules for Radicals, by Saul Alinsky.

== Rules for Radicals, by Saul Alinsky
Rules for Radicals: A Pragmatic Primer for Realistic Radicals is the last book written by community organizer Saul D. Alinsky, published in 1971
• RULE 1: “Power is not only what you have, but what the enemy thinks you have.” Power is derived from 2 main sources – money and people. “Have-Nots” must build power from flesh and blood. (These are two things of which there is a plentiful supply. Government and corporations always have a difficult time appealing to people, and usually do so almost exclusively with economic arguments.)
• RULE 2: “Never go outside the expertise of your people.” It results in confusion, fear and retreat. Feeling secure adds to the backbone of anyone. (Organizations under attack wonder why radicals don’t address the “real” issues. This is why. They avoid things with which they have no knowledge.)
• RULE 3: “Whenever possible, go outside the expertise of the enemy.” Look for ways to increase insecurity, anxiety and uncertainty. (This happens all the time. Watch how many organizations under attack are blind-sided by seemingly irrelevant arguments that they are then forced to address.)
• RULE 4: “Make the enemy live up to its own book of rules.” If the rule is that every letter gets a reply, send 30,000 letters. You can kill them with this because no one can possibly obey all of their own rules. (This is a serious rule. The besieged entity’s very credibility and reputation is at stake, because if activists catch it lying or not living up to its commitments, they can continue to chip away at the damage.)
• RULE 5: “Ridicule is man’s most potent weapon.” There is no defense. It’s irrational. It’s infuriating. It also works as a key pressure point to force the enemy into concessions. (Pretty crude, rude and mean, huh? They want to create anger and fear.)
• RULE 6: “A good tactic is one your people enjoy.” They’ll keep doing it without urging and come back to do more. They’re doing their thing, and will even suggest better ones. (Radical activists, in this sense, are no different that any other human being. We all avoid “un-fun” activities, and but we revel at and enjoy the ones that work and bring results.)
• RULE 7: “A tactic that drags on too long becomes a drag.” Don’t become old news. (Even radical activists get bored. So to keep them excited and involved, organizers are constantly coming up with new tactics.)
• RULE 8: “Keep the pressure on. Never let up.” Keep trying new things to keep the opposition off balance. As the opposition masters one approach, hit them from the flank with something new. (Attack, attack, attack from all sides, never giving the reeling organization a chance to rest, regroup, recover and re-strategize.)
• RULE 9: “The threat is usually more terrifying than the thing itself.” Imagination and ego can dream up many more consequences than any activist. (Perception is reality. Large organizations always prepare a worst-case scenario, something that may be furthest from the activists’ minds. The upshot is that the organization will expend enormous time and energy, creating in its own collective mind the direst of conclusions. The possibilities can easily poison the mind and result in demoralization.)
• RULE 10: “If you push a negative hard enough, it will push through and become a positive.” Violence from the other side can win the public to your side because the public sympathizes with the underdog. (Unions used this tactic. Peaceful [albeit loud] demonstrations during the heyday of unions in the early to mid-20th Century incurred management’s wrath, often in the form of violence that eventually brought public sympathy to their side.)
• RULE 11: “The price of a successful attack is a constructive alternative.” Never let the enemy score points because you’re caught without a solution to the

God I hope mittens is funny this time around. I miss Dan Quayle terribly.

Why defend him.

He is running for PRESIDENT, if he can't even get it right when introducing his running mate, what can he get right.

I have no dog in this race, but damn, if he is the finest you have to offer up as a candidate, you are in deep, deep do-do.

Republicans = SATAN

Freudian slip?

meh, only most of them