ALERT! Second SUN!! Very clear vid from Aug 13 2012 | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 18151579 United States 08/14/2012 02:48 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Starting around 30 seconds, the individual clearly distinguishes that this is NOT a flare of some sort. The video that you've made is a lens flare moving back and forth. Again, this guy breaks it down starting around 30seconds that this is NOT a lense flare or any other flare of that sort. [link to www.youtube.com] Please watch the video again. Also thanks for your input. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 21588991 United States 08/14/2012 02:48 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Come on now, that looks nothing at all like the other video. You're saying, see there is no second sun in my video, therefore the others are fake. I might need a little more than that. Some people live their whole lives being wrong! Amazing! Sorry buddy but thats not even close. The other vid the second sun doesn't bounce around when he moves/walks. How do you explain that? |
Of the Stars User ID: 7463943 Canada 08/14/2012 02:49 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | So, if I make a fake video of UFO's, does that mean all UFO videos are fake? If I make a fake ghost video, does that mean all ghost videos are fake? If I make a fake bigfoot video, does that mean all bigfoot videos are fake? If I make a fake........... Please use logic, your video proves or disproves nothing. . I've made a lot of fake UFO videos. I don't post them up, they are just for class in animation and the film company I work for. However I could fool you and the rest if I did. I just don't. “Life lived in the absence of the psychedelic experience that primordial shamanism is based on is life trivialized, life denied, life enslaved to the ego.” |
spencer User ID: 20949986 Canada 08/14/2012 02:52 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 21588991 United States 08/14/2012 02:54 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Yes, I see that too. Anyone feeling convinced on this, kindly take the frame finder at the bottom of the video to 1:37 and slide one more frame. Poof, it's gone. Please do it and get over this one - the second sun is not really there. It's still there when I try that. What are you seeing? It's in every frame around 1:37 |
Dr. Astro Senior Forum Moderator User ID: 4211721 United States 08/14/2012 02:55 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | You would cry if you heard how many people I talked to about it here in NJ that replied, "Well I never look up!" Seriously, they never look up Quoting: Black Knight Go visit one of these events and ask how many of them look up: [link to www.uacnj.org] Then ask about any given object you see in the sky is and you'll find out what it really is. |
JustAnotherVisitor User ID: 19803015 Netherlands 08/14/2012 02:57 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | its time for the U heeft vast wel eens het gevoel dat er iets niet klopt aan een bepaald bericht zoals bijvoorbeeld de vele aardbevingen die op het moment plaats vinden, vulkaanuitbarstingen, uw gezondheid en welzijn, over de kracht van de zon, het weer, etc. Wij zijn op zoek naar de waarheid achter deze berichten en om het voor u allemaal zo duidelijk mogelijk te maken, proberen wij u zo alles duidelijk te maken en het voor u op Verborgen Nieuws te plaatsen. De wereld ondergaat een grote verandering, daarom laten wij u zien wat er daadwerkelijk plaats vind op onze wereld! [link to www.verborgennieuws.nl] |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 16091482 United States 08/14/2012 02:57 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1369638 Puerto Rico 08/14/2012 02:58 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Does this need pinned? Can anyone explain this? or is it too early for GLP'rs : P Quoting: ghost_Safari 10051080 The explanation is simple however no one wants to hear or face the facts. If you say you see it siniXster, then I belive it, I know you can be trusted. I had been watching a planet/dwarf/whatever with a number of moons for over a year now that clear the treeline to my E/SE for over a year now. The moons made a cross in the sky and my wife and neighbor watched it with me many times. This arrangement appears in a completely different area of the shy than Jupiter which we also observe while it is visible. You would cry if you heard how many people I talked to about it here in NJ that replied, "Well I never look up!" Seriously, they never look up I guess it is hard to elevate your neck in an upward direction when your head is lodged firmly up your ass. They are signs and most do not see. There is a reason: Many will be called, but few will be chosen! I would say, use your time wisely, but I already know you will. Peace. Good reply! |
get_over_it (OP) User ID: 4589968 Canada 08/14/2012 02:58 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Funny thing about Youtube, when I first saw the video this morning it had 848 views, and yet this thread has close to 5000 views - you would figure at least 10% would view the video - why aren't the view numbers moving up? . The conscious and intelligent manipulation of the organized habits and opinions of the masses is an important element in democratic society. Those who manipulate this unseen mechanism of society constitute an invisible government which is the true ruling power of our country. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 7321230 United States 08/14/2012 03:00 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Interesting. It has is it's own reddish lensflare so it's definitely not flare of the sun. Quoting: balthuuu Definetly not a flare... Look at this guy, he is covering the sun with his hand... But the object is still there! He never covers up the sun, only partially blocks it. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 18151579 United States 08/14/2012 03:01 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 16091482 United States 08/14/2012 03:02 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Which explanation? Jupiter? Venus? Nibiru? Dimensional shift? (Btw im not trying to be a smart ass just would like to know your opinion) :) IMO it is an inbound heavy mass object. Wrong. Thread: Nibiru Analysis *Jupiter analysis on page 20* No name but called by many, NASA is calling it Tyche and they have it plotted, Quoting: sinixsterTyche is a hypothetical planet theorized by Matese. According to the Tyche hypothesis it's nowhere near here, it's at Oort cloud distances. If you have a file from nasa that has the orbital elements for Tyche, let's see it. Downloaded it to Stellarium from JPL, it's on my laptop at home, probably don't have the download file anymore but I'll take a screenshot or make a short vid if I have time tonight and drop it in. If it were hypothetical why and how would they have the orbital elements? |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 18151579 United States 08/14/2012 03:02 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Daersoulkeeper User ID: 1122541 United States 08/14/2012 03:03 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | How fucking stupid are you.lens flare moving everywhere. Other guys object is stationary even when he moves. fucking moran the real reason most people on this planet are the most ignorant gullible people that have ever lived is a little thing called the TELL-LIE-VISION television when you watch it, you put the I(you) in television and you get tel(i)evision tell lie vision |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 4655644 United States 08/14/2012 03:05 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | You would cry if you heard how many people I talked to about it here in NJ that replied, "Well I never look up!" Seriously, they never look up Quoting: Black Knight Go visit one of these events and ask how many of them look up: [link to www.uacnj.org] Then ask about any given object you see in the sky is and you'll find out what it really is. I know AM, I have always respected your views and still do, but frankly, it doesn't matter what scientists, or astrologists or physicists say because any number of them can be found to say any number of conflicting things at any given time. What matters is perception of the masses. Yes perception, not truth, truth DOES NOT EXIST! It is perception of the masses that brings down dynasties or upholds them. Never trust science it is ALWAYS for sale to the highest bidder! |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 21931655 Bulgaria 08/14/2012 03:07 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 7321230 United States 08/14/2012 03:08 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | How fucking stupid are you.lens flare moving everywhere. Other guys object is stationary even when he moves. fucking moran Except, in this video made by the same person: [link to www.youtube.com] The "object" does move around and in fact disappears at one minute, thirty-sevin seconds into the film. Same object. Only it appears he got better at filming it to fool stupid people. |
Dr. Astro Senior Forum Moderator User ID: 4211721 United States 08/14/2012 03:08 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 14779720 Which explanation? Jupiter? Venus? Nibiru? Dimensional shift? (Btw im not trying to be a smart ass just would like to know your opinion) :) IMO it is an inbound heavy mass object. Wrong. Thread: Nibiru Analysis *Jupiter analysis on page 20* No name but called by many, NASA is calling it Tyche and they have it plotted, Quoting: sinixsterTyche is a hypothetical planet theorized by Matese. According to the Tyche hypothesis it's nowhere near here, it's at Oort cloud distances. If you have a file from nasa that has the orbital elements for Tyche, let's see it. Downloaded it to Stellarium from JPL, Then you must have the orbital elements. Post them. I don't want to see a video, I want the orbital elements. Post or BS. If it were hypothetical why and how would they have the orbital elements? Quoting: sinixsterThat depends. Perhaps you were stupid enough to mistake asteroid 258 Tyche for Matese and Whitmire's hypothetical planet Tyche. [link to ssd.jpl.nasa.gov] Again, I don't want to see a video of stellarium, that's worthless and meaningless, I want to see the actual orbital elements you claim to have downloaded from JPL and put into stellarium. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 21931655 Bulgaria 08/14/2012 03:09 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 16091482 United States 08/14/2012 03:09 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Does this need pinned? Can anyone explain this? or is it too early for GLP'rs : P Quoting: ghost_Safari 10051080 The explanation is simple however no one wants to hear or face the facts. If you say you see it siniXster, then I belive it, I know you can be trusted. I had been watching a planet/dwarf/whatever with a number of moons for over a year now that clear the treeline to my E/SE for over a year now. The moons made a cross in the sky and my wife and neighbor watched it with me many times. This arrangement appears in a completely different area of the shy than Jupiter which we also observe while it is visible. You would cry if you heard how many people I talked to about it here in NJ that replied, "Well I never look up!" Seriously, they never look up I guess it is hard to elevate your neck in an upward direction when your head is lodged firmly up your ass. They are signs and most do not see. There is a reason: Many will be called, but few will be chosen! I would say, use your time wisely, but I already know you will. Peace. Thank you for the back up Brother and thank you for the trust, my son was the first to see it, woke me at 4am on a work day last week so it better have been good, lol. As far as spending my time goes, we've taken a step back from media and have been prepping and just being together everyday. Preps are just about done save for a few odds and ends, can never spend too much time with friends and family tho. Either way, spiritually and physically, I and my family are ready to face what is happening, whether it be this, the methane, corexit, pandemic or anything else that may get thrown at us in the next few months. Much love and peace to you my friend. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1122796 Ukraine 08/14/2012 03:11 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 2780903 United States 08/14/2012 03:11 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 18151579 United States 08/14/2012 03:11 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | How fucking stupid are you.lens flare moving everywhere. Other guys object is stationary even when he moves. fucking moran Except, in this video made by the same person: [link to www.youtube.com] The "object" does move around and in fact disappears at one minute, thirty-sevin seconds into the film. Same object. Only it appears he got better at filming it to fool stupid people. is it moving around at the same pace of the video you quoted above. Are they truly moving around in the same type of way? I don't see it if so, I do agree that the object does disappear at 1:37 and 2:35'ish ... this is obviously because he's moving the camera away to film something else. |
Dr. Astro Senior Forum Moderator User ID: 4211721 United States 08/14/2012 03:11 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | You would cry if you heard how many people I talked to about it here in NJ that replied, "Well I never look up!" Seriously, they never look up Quoting: Black Knight Go visit one of these events and ask how many of them look up: [link to www.uacnj.org] Then ask about any given object you see in the sky is and you'll find out what it really is. I know AM, I have always respected your views and still do, but frankly, it doesn't matter what scientists, or astrologists or physicists say because any number of them can be found to say any number of conflicting things at any given time. They're amateur astronomers not astrologists. Ask them how many have conflicting ideas about whatever you're pointing out to them in the sky. What matters is perception of the masses. Quoting: BKNo, it doesn't at all. Yes perception, not truth, truth DOES NOT EXIST! Quoting: BKKeep telling yourself that and try to walk through a wall. Never trust science it is ALWAYS for sale to the highest bidder! Quoting: BKOh brother. Amateur astronomers are not for sale. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1658841 Canada 08/14/2012 03:15 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 21914585 Germany 08/14/2012 03:16 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 7321230 United States 08/14/2012 03:21 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | How fucking stupid are you.lens flare moving everywhere. Other guys object is stationary even when he moves. fucking moran Except, in this video made by the same person: [link to www.youtube.com] The "object" does move around and in fact disappears at one minute, thirty-sevin seconds into the film. Same object. Only it appears he got better at filming it to fool stupid people. is it moving around at the same pace of the video you quoted above. Are they truly moving around in the same type of way? I don't see it if so, I do agree that the object does disappear at 1:37 and 2:35'ish ... this is obviously because he's moving the camera away to film something else. No, it's not moving in the same manner as the smaller flare. I would gather that this is because the curved or beveled edge of the lens refracts the light it different ways. But the object disappears before it is off the frame, as soon as a the sun is of the frame, the object vanishes. Also, the videos have been on the web for YEARS now. If an object of sizable mass was headed our way, the "object" would naturally grow in size during it's documentation. But it doesn't. And, one question people are unable to answer... why the HELL can't we see it? We cant see it because it's not there. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 21959415 United Kingdom 08/14/2012 03:21 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Its funny how the debunkers say this is a lense flare,if you look at the object it has its own lense flare that red glow that moves round it at the beginning,no one can deny that there isnt an object clearly there,the only question is what is it. |
TOMMY B User ID: 21926336 United States 08/14/2012 03:21 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Yes, I see that too. Anyone feeling convinced on this, kindly take the frame finder at the bottom of the video to 1:37 and slide one more frame. Poof, it's gone. Please do it and get over this one - the second sun is not really there. It's still there when I try that. What are you seeing? It's in every frame around 1:37 There are 3 different videos from the same person on his you tube channel. The one dated Aug 2nd is the one that it disappears at 1:37, also you can see the reflection[object] get closer and farther from the sun when he moves. |