| Users Online Now: 2,081 (Who's On?) | Visitors Today: 1,933,176 | |
| Pageviews Today: 2,856,366 | Threads Today: 779 | Posts Today: 16,234 |
| 11:16 PM | ||
| Users Online Now: 2,081 (Who's On?) | Visitors Today: 1,933,176 | |
| Pageviews Today: 2,856,366 | Threads Today: 779 | Posts Today: 16,234 |
| 11:16 PM | ||
omg.. just saw Jesse Ventura on Pierced Morgan CNN... mentions WTC7 and BBC video!! | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 2134890  Sweden09/18/2012 03:32 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 22468702  United States09/18/2012 03:35 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 1008941 United States09/18/2012 03:36 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
JennOfArc  User ID: 13109200 United States09/18/2012 03:41 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Wait.... Quoting: JennOfArc The reporter has WTC 7 behind her, in her live shot. Emphesis on LIVE SHOT, not recorded. If BBC were putting something over on the people by staging this shot before the building collapsed (ie had some sort of knowledge because it was a conspiracy) they would have shot the footage somewhere else....not with the building standing directly behind her. All you have here is a reporter who doesn't know what she's talking about. There was a LOT of bad information being put out there when this happened, because it was shocking and "fluid" for so long. Even news organizations had trouble keeping up with the deluge of information. For awhile people recieved reports that the White House had been hit, and talked about it on the air, but it turned out not to be the case, and there were hundreds more similiar examples. Networks scrambled to get ANYONE on the air with a liveshot and information. Or, you can believe that this third tier BBC reporter had inside information that the building would fall, and thought, well I'll go ahead and tape this because I have better things to do, then we'll pretend it's live... And then proceeded to make her fake live report on the fallen building, while standing in front of that building hoping nobody would notice..instead of standing in front of a pile of rubble or without the skyline in the background. I like Jessie Ventura, but in this case I'd have to disagree. This was broadcast LIVE BEFORE THE BUILDING FELL. You're disagreeing with fact, not his opinion. No,I'm not. The fact that it was broadcast LIVE before the building fell, but with the building in the background goes back to what I'm trying to explain to you. WTC7 was a controlled demolition. The predemolition announcement is one of their gaffes during this false flag. Look, I know that 9/11 being an inside job is a popular angle here, so I won't try to single handedly argue the point with the whole board. What I will say is that in THIS CASE I just don't see it. I have the unique perspective of being someone who was broadcasting live on the air the morning of September 11th 2001, I recall it like it was yesterday, it changed my life. I feel very strongly about certain things, and working in media and not being a shill, I'm open minded enough to say yes, that was contrived or no, that was legit. I myself do not trust MSM, but because I know the inner workings I can usually tell what is hinky and what is legit. For what it's worth, the US government is able to take over the airwaves, both Radio and Television. There are codes and sealed envelopes at stations to be opened and cross checked if the government sends out the signal. I think if this were a false flag the government would have taken over the airwaves before they would have told news sources the world over about their plan to destroy the WTC....there are far too many people involved in broadcasting for the bosses to just say "read this" while ignoring what was going on around them. |
| Démodé User ID: 23771538  Serbia09/18/2012 03:42 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 938316 United States09/18/2012 03:46 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 938316 United States09/18/2012 03:48 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| The Gallows User ID: 22888087 United States09/18/2012 03:53 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Look, I know that 9/11 being an inside job is a popular angle here, so I won't try to single handedly argue the point with the whole board. What I will say is that in THIS CASE I just don't see it. I have the unique perspective of being someone who was broadcasting live on the air the morning of September 11th 2001, I recall it like it was yesterday, it changed my life. I feel very strongly about certain things, and working in media and not being a shill, I'm open minded enough to say yes, that was contrived or no, that was legit. I myself do not trust MSM, but because I know the inner workings I can usually tell what is hinky and what is legit. For what it's worth, the US government is able to take over the airwaves, both Radio and Television. There are codes and sealed envelopes at stations to be opened and cross checked if the government sends out the signal. I think if this were a false flag the government would have taken over the airwaves before they would have told news sources the world over about their plan to destroy the WTC....there are far too many people involved in broadcasting for the bosses to just say "read this" while ignoring what was going on around them. Quoting: JennOfArc Are you that reporter chick from the video? Still on the payroll? rhombus will set you free... — some try to tell me thoughts they cannot defend. just what you want to be, you will be in the end! — if you can't face the truth it's probably raping you from behind. |
| JennOfArc User ID: 13109200 United States09/18/2012 03:58 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Look, I know that 9/11 being an inside job is a popular angle here, so I won't try to single handedly argue the point with the whole board. What I will say is that in THIS CASE I just don't see it. I have the unique perspective of being someone who was broadcasting live on the air the morning of September 11th 2001, I recall it like it was yesterday, it changed my life. I feel very strongly about certain things, and working in media and not being a shill, I'm open minded enough to say yes, that was contrived or no, that was legit. I myself do not trust MSM, but because I know the inner workings I can usually tell what is hinky and what is legit. For what it's worth, the US government is able to take over the airwaves, both Radio and Television. There are codes and sealed envelopes at stations to be opened and cross checked if the government sends out the signal. I think if this were a false flag the government would have taken over the airwaves before they would have told news sources the world over about their plan to destroy the WTC....there are far too many people involved in broadcasting for the bosses to just say "read this" while ignoring what was going on around them. Quoting: JennOfArc Are you that reporter chick from the video? Still on the payroll? No need to be condescending. I'm not trying to argue about 9/11 being an inside job. What I am saying is that this particular example being touted as "proof" isn't a good example. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 17851333 United States09/18/2012 04:07 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Look, I know that 9/11 being an inside job is a popular angle here, so I won't try to single handedly argue the point with the whole board. What I will say is that in THIS CASE I just don't see it. I have the unique perspective of being someone who was broadcasting live on the air the morning of September 11th 2001, I recall it like it was yesterday, it changed my life. I feel very strongly about certain things, and working in media and not being a shill, I'm open minded enough to say yes, that was contrived or no, that was legit. I myself do not trust MSM, but because I know the inner workings I can usually tell what is hinky and what is legit. For what it's worth, the US government is able to take over the airwaves, both Radio and Television. There are codes and sealed envelopes at stations to be opened and cross checked if the government sends out the signal. I think if this were a false flag the government would have taken over the airwaves before they would have told news sources the world over about their plan to destroy the WTC....there are far too many people involved in broadcasting for the bosses to just say "read this" while ignoring what was going on around them. Quoting: JennOfArc Are you that reporter chick from the video? Still on the payroll? No need to be condescending. I'm not trying to argue about 9/11 being an inside job. What I am saying is that this particular example being touted as "proof" isn't a good example. I think the real question here should be: How many of the other false reports came true after they were put out there? I do believe the answer is no. They said this or that and it turned out to be false. This was false when being reported, but came true 20 minutes later. And that is why people are looking at this as some pretty hard evidence that someone screwed up with her script and released the info too soon. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 17851333 United States09/18/2012 04:08 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 22820077  United Kingdom09/18/2012 04:15 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | 5 stars OP - but PIERCED? really?  PIERS morgan, eh? i knew he had ponced off to the states but assumed he was doing what he did here - interviewing 'celebrities'. he is not well liked over here never heard of this ventura guy before - seems like a decent guy, telling it like it is i think we give the audience a bit too much credit here. they are pretty much there to be on tv. so happens this particular evening the topic of 9/11 comes up. i would bet a decent whack on most of them having been clueless before mr venturas 'disclosure' the bbc footage isnt a 'mistake'. just the fact the she was cut off in such a manner tells you it wasnt a technical problem. ive seen a few quotes from studio engineers to confirm this. she was pulled piers morgan is your average sheep, or he would be were he not on tv. he just spouts the official line |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 23692995  Australia09/18/2012 04:15 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 938316 United States09/18/2012 04:20 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 17851333 United States09/18/2012 04:22 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 18563637 United States09/18/2012 04:24 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 17851333 United States09/18/2012 04:24 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Oh, btw, Piers' crackpot comments against Ventura are just the beginning. It's how they treated Ron Paul in both elections. So we already can see how they are going to play the game. Better come up with some strategy to get over that hump, otherwise, it'll be political masturbation all over again. I'm too tired for that shit again. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 21041180 United Kingdom09/18/2012 04:25 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | So you tards are excited that a corrupt america-hating Slovak who lives in Mexico is thinking about trying to run in 4 years. Jesse is a lieing, cheating embaressment that doesnt know what believes about anything. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 22242639 United Kingdom09/18/2012 04:33 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 2143478 United States09/18/2012 04:35 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 19107630 Australia09/18/2012 04:38 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 22242639 United Kingdom09/18/2012 04:38 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | The reporter just got it wrong, simple mistake with all that was going on that day. Do you really think they could pull this off and have no one blow the whistle on this by now? Your dumber that I thought. The video proves nothing other than your a fk wit for thinking otherwise.  |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 5373157 United Kingdom09/18/2012 04:39 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Look, I know that 9/11 being an inside job is a popular angle here, so I won't try to single handedly argue the point with the whole board. What I will say is that in THIS CASE I just don't see it. I have the unique perspective of being someone who was broadcasting live on the air the morning of September 11th 2001, I recall it like it was yesterday, it changed my life. I feel very strongly about certain things, and working in media and not being a shill, I'm open minded enough to say yes, that was contrived or no, that was legit. I myself do not trust MSM, but because I know the inner workings I can usually tell what is hinky and what is legit. For what it's worth, the US government is able to take over the airwaves, both Radio and Television. There are codes and sealed envelopes at stations to be opened and cross checked if the government sends out the signal. I think if this were a false flag the government would have taken over the airwaves before they would have told news sources the world over about their plan to destroy the WTC....there are far too many people involved in broadcasting for the bosses to just say "read this" while ignoring what was going on around them. Quoting: JennOfArc Are you that reporter chick from the video? Still on the payroll? No need to be condescending. I'm not trying to argue about 9/11 being an inside job. What I am saying is that this particular example being touted as "proof" isn't a good example. Building no.7 went down as a demolition job, for that to happen it takes weeks/months of prep.. to do that. Like the twin towers, it was set up to be destroyed. That is the real point here.. So, the BBC reporting LIVE that building no.7 had gone down with it still in the background is neither here or there for me as you could argue about time delay of the broadcast, fake background, whatever. It is suspicious, no doubt. The fact it went straight down as a demolition job like the twin towers only adds fuel to the fire to the 'inside job' explanation. There were only small fires in n' around building no.7, no need to destroy it. How can they just 'pull' a building down anyway. Are all buildings built with the ability to be 'pulled' without any prep..? |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 17851333 United States09/18/2012 04:39 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | So you tards are excited that a corrupt america-hating Slovak who lives in Mexico is thinking about trying to run in 4 years. Jesse is a lieing, cheating embaressment that doesnt know what believes about anything. Quoting: SheldonCooper Well, that didn't take long, did it. Put up some proof of your accusations and I might just read them and be convinced that you know what you are talking about. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 21041180 United Kingdom09/18/2012 04:41 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | So you tards are excited that a corrupt america-hating Slovak who lives in Mexico is thinking about trying to run in 4 years. Jesse is a lieing, cheating embaressment that doesnt know what believes about anything. Quoting: SheldonCooper Well, that didn't take long, did it. Put up some proof of your accusations and I might just read them and be convinced that you know what you are talking about. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 1737161 United States09/18/2012 04:42 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 22820077 United Kingdom09/18/2012 04:44 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 17851333 United States09/18/2012 04:46 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | So you tards are excited that a corrupt america-hating Slovak who lives in Mexico is thinking about trying to run in 4 years. Jesse is a lieing, cheating embaressment that doesnt know what believes about anything. Quoting: SheldonCooper Well, that didn't take long, did it. Put up some proof of your accusations and I might just read them and be convinced that you know what you are talking about. What the hell was that? I couldn't even hear what they were saying the quality is so bad and I don't know who the others were in that video, if you can even call it that. This is it? That's your proof? Need something better than that. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 21041180 United Kingdom09/18/2012 04:48 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | So you tards are excited that a corrupt america-hating Slovak who lives in Mexico is thinking about trying to run in 4 years. Jesse is a lieing, cheating embaressment that doesnt know what believes about anything. Quoting: SheldonCooper youre funny whats he lying about? Being a navy seal, his corruption trial, he changes his mind each week between Bush let 9/11 happen - Bush made 9/11 happen - Thermite - Magic space laser. Remember when he said it was all about the Lithium yet nothing ever came of it? He is a joke trying to sell a crap book about corrupt millionaire politicians when he himself was a corrupt millionaire politician. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 22820077 United Kingdom09/18/2012 04:50 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | The reporter just got it wrong, simple mistake with all that was going on that day. Do you really think they could pull this off and have no one blow the whistle on this by now? Your dumber that I thought. The video proves nothing other than your a fk wit for thinking otherwise. youre being sarcastic, right? 'just got it wrong', 'simple mistake' HOW? it is simply not possible to extrapolate that she made a simple mistake. at least with genuine extrapolation you actually can see where mistakes could have been made unless of course you are being deliberately obtuse, or just trolling no, youre being sarcastic and i fell for it. yeah |
