| Users Online Now: 2,073 (Who's On?) | Visitors Today: 1,277,462 | |
| Pageviews Today: 1,745,505 | Threads Today: 443 | Posts Today: 7,351 |
| 01:55 PM | ||
| Users Online Now: 2,073 (Who's On?) | Visitors Today: 1,277,462 | |
| Pageviews Today: 1,745,505 | Threads Today: 443 | Posts Today: 7,351 |
| 01:55 PM | ||
God is A Mathematician | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 1106916  United States09/22/2012 10:10 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 24218469  United Kingdom09/22/2012 10:14 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 24227333 United Kingdom09/22/2012 10:17 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | If you are looking for mathematical evidence for divine design (therefore God), spend the next six months studying the research at: [link to smphillips.8m.com] Here is TRUE unification of all sacred geometries and how they embody in analogous ways scientific information about the nature of matter. |
| Tekunda User ID: 24223432  Germany09/22/2012 10:17 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 1106916 United States09/22/2012 10:17 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Isn't this looking at things backwards? Quoting: Anonymous Coward 24218469 Applying math to explain the Universe is an expression of human thought not Biblical. Just because 2+2=4 doesn't mean that something designed it that way simply that we have found the language capable of expressing it. Nice post though. It's showing that our world was designed by a great intelligence and that the bible numerics is proof that it was inspired by God. It wasn't just random.  |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 19045680 United States09/22/2012 10:20 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | P.M. Dirac |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 24218469 United Kingdom09/22/2012 10:22 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Isn't this looking at things backwards? Quoting: Anonymous Coward 24218469 Applying math to explain the Universe is an expression of human thought not Biblical. Just because 2+2=4 doesn't mean that something designed it that way simply that we have found the language capable of expressing it. Nice post though. It's showing that our world was designed by a great intelligence and that the bible numerics is proof that it was inspired by God. It wasn't just random. Have you seen the movie Pi? If not you should. Tbh I've always liked the idea that all text contains fragments of a pattern. |
| Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 1106916 United States09/22/2012 10:23 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | "It seems to be one of the fundamental features of nature that fundamental physical laws are described in terms of a mathematical theory of great beauty and power, needing quite a high standard of mathematics for one to understand it. You may wonder: Why is nature constructed along these lines? One can only answer that our present knowledge seems to show that nature is so constructed. We simply have to accept it. One could perhaps describe the situation by saying that God is a mathematician of a very high order, and He used very advanced mathematics in constructing the universe. Our feeble attempts at mathematics enable us to understand a bit of the universe, and as we proceed to develop higher and higher mathematics we can hope to understand the universe better." Quoting: Anonymous Coward 19045680 P.M. Dirac |
| Tekunda User ID: 24223432 Germany09/22/2012 10:25 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Isn't this looking at things backwards? Quoting: Anonymous Coward 24218469 Applying math to explain the Universe is an expression of human thought not Biblical. Just because 2+2=4 doesn't mean that something designed it that way simply that we have found the language capable of expressing it. Nice post though. Wrong conclusion. The Bible's "math code" is not used to explain the Universe. Human thought has not put the math (numerical seal) into the Bible, but was used by the author as a kind of watermark. If the code is so complicated that no human is capable of devising such a code - and as mathematical genius Ivan Vital claims it to be - the authorship of the Bible must be divine. This is the only logical conclusion to draw from such a numerical seal! |
| Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 1106916 United States09/22/2012 10:25 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 1106916 United States09/22/2012 10:26 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Isn't this looking at things backwards? Quoting: Anonymous Coward 24218469 Applying math to explain the Universe is an expression of human thought not Biblical. Just because 2+2=4 doesn't mean that something designed it that way simply that we have found the language capable of expressing it. Nice post though. Wrong conclusion. The Bible's "math code" is not used to explain the Universe. Human thought has not put the math (numerical seal) into the Bible, but was used by the author as a kind of watermark. If the code is so complicated that no human is capable of devising such a code - and as mathematical genius Ivan Vital claims it to be - the authorship of the Bible must be divine. This is the only logical conclusion to draw from such a numerical seal! Yep!  |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 24218469 United Kingdom09/22/2012 10:28 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Isn't this looking at things backwards? Quoting: Anonymous Coward 24218469 Applying math to explain the Universe is an expression of human thought not Biblical. Just because 2+2=4 doesn't mean that something designed it that way simply that we have found the language capable of expressing it. Nice post though. Wrong conclusion. The Bible's "math code" is not used to explain the Universe. Human thought has not put the math (numerical seal) into the Bible, but was used by the author as a kind of watermark. If the code is so complicated that no human is capable of devising such a code - and as mathematical genius Ivan Vital claims it to be - the authorship of the Bible must be divine. This is the only logical conclusion to draw from such a numerical seal! Yet you discount many none devine sources from your logic. To claim divinity of origin you must first have absolute proof that the Devine exists, or one could simply say aliens did it. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 16845676 United States09/22/2012 10:32 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 1106916 United States09/22/2012 10:36 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Yep, the evidence of God is everywhere, in the Bible, in nature and even the human body! One of my favorite all time videos, is this one by Mike Hoggard that shows everything that most people never realize, know, or think about. It's mind boggling! "Science is catching up with the Bible! In this video, Pastor Michael Hoggard shows the amazing correlations between the Holy Bible and DNA, and how the Gospel message is literally encoded in our genetic structure." |
| Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 1106916 United States09/22/2012 11:18 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 24050826  China09/22/2012 11:37 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Tekunda User ID: 24223432 Germany09/22/2012 03:27 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Isn't this looking at things backwards? Quoting: Anonymous Coward 24218469 Applying math to explain the Universe is an expression of human thought not Biblical. Just because 2+2=4 doesn't mean that something designed it that way simply that we have found the language capable of expressing it. Nice post though. Wrong conclusion. The Bible's "math code" is not used to explain the Universe. Human thought has not put the math (numerical seal) into the Bible, but was used by the author as a kind of watermark. If the code is so complicated that no human is capable of devising such a code - and as mathematical genius Ivan Vital claims it to be - the authorship of the Bible must be divine. This is the only logical conclusion to draw from such a numerical seal! Yet you discount many none devine sources from your logic. To claim divinity of origin you must first have absolute proof that the Devine exists, or one could simply say aliens did it. I understand. Before you bow your knee to God, you would rather bow your knee to some crazy aliens. |
| Tekunda User ID: 24223432 Germany09/22/2012 03:28 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 1554617 United States09/22/2012 03:32 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 24180457 United States09/22/2012 03:39 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Isn't this looking at things backwards? Quoting: Anonymous Coward 24218469 Applying math to explain the Universe is an expression of human thought not Biblical. Just because 2+2=4 doesn't mean that something designed it that way simply that we have found the language capable of expressing it. Nice post though. Wrong conclusion. The Bible's "math code" is not used to explain the Universe. Human thought has not put the math (numerical seal) into the Bible, but was used by the author as a kind of watermark. If the code is so complicated that no human is capable of devising such a code - and as mathematical genius Ivan Vital claims it to be - the authorship of the Bible must be divine. This is the only logical conclusion to draw from such a numerical seal! Yet you discount many none devine sources from your logic. To claim divinity of origin you must first have absolute proof that the Devine exists, or one could simply say aliens did it. I understand. Before you bow your knee to God, you would rather bow your knee to some crazy aliens. It is far better to live on your feet...than die on your knees. |
aether  User ID: 23952275 United Kingdom09/22/2012 03:39 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | "the machine theory that came along in the 17th century gave a different kind of theology. God was like a machine maker who designed and made all the machinery of life as it were from outside. It was casting god in the image of technological man. God was like an engineer and a mathematician and the forms and purposes of things came from outside not from inside. When living organisms were thought of as organisms they possessed their own purposes, their own goal. What this revolution did was took the purposes and goals and shapes and forms , the designs, as they were called out of living organisms and put them outside nature into the mind of god" Quoting: aether |
| Tekunda User ID: 24223432 Germany09/22/2012 07:02 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 17090286 United States09/22/2012 07:09 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | God is the ultimate scientist and mathematician. Not only that, he is the founder of Chaos theory.  The big bang, evolution, all started by his hand. He didn't lovingly craft everything individually like the bible would have us believe... no, he let everything evolve as it's own little miracle of free will. The universe is the ultimate test of free will. Evolution. It is all about Evolution. |
| Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 1106916 United States09/22/2012 07:14 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 20767845 United States09/23/2012 07:51 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | No matter how much "proof" you give of the validity of the Bible most will dispute it. Like Obummer..no matter how much crap he does to ruin this country...people STILL will vote for him. Bottom line: God says some will see, most won't...period. Broad is the way that leads to destruction and narrow is the way that leads to eternal life....and few will find it. Paraphrased of course, but the bottom line is there will be few people destined for God's Kingdom...and the majority destined for the fires of hell. Good post. |
| Rising Son User ID: 23880055  Japan09/23/2012 07:55 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Thanks, Lisa :-) "Be still, and know that I am God." Psalm 46:10 Truth needs no validation because it is self-evident and undeniable. Therefore, anything that requires validation to be realized or justified as truth must contain at least some degree of falsehood. Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak. [link to www.youtube.com (secure)] |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 19539335  Bulgaria09/23/2012 07:59 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| stormer User ID: 24106687  South Africa09/23/2012 08:02 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| strategicdiscernment User ID: 13810756 United States09/23/2012 08:03 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Isn't this looking at things backwards? Quoting: Anonymous Coward 24218469 Applying math to explain the Universe is an expression of human thought not Biblical. Just because 2+2=4 doesn't mean that something designed it that way simply that we have found the language capable of expressing it. Nice post though. Wrong conclusion. The Bible's "math code" is not used to explain the Universe. Human thought has not put the math (numerical seal) into the Bible, but was used by the author as a kind of watermark. If the code is so complicated that no human is capable of devising such a code - and as mathematical genius Ivan Vital claims it to be - the authorship of the Bible must be divine. This is the only logical conclusion to draw from such a numerical seal! Yet you discount many none devine sources from your logic. To claim divinity of origin you must first have absolute proof that the Devine exists, or one could simply say aliens did it.  LORD WILL THEY EVER SEE PAST THEIR OWN WRETCHED PRIDE? “It would never come into their heads to fabricate such colossal untruths, and they would not believe that others could have the impudence to distort the truth so infamously. Even though the facts which prove this to be so may be brought clearly to their minds, they will still doubt and waver and will continue to think that there must be some other explanation.” -Adolf Hitler 1925 ___________ Thread: Understanding our SOVEREIGNTY & REPUBLIC <--- Must watch [2 videos] ___________ “The principle object of their directorate consists in this: To debilitate the public mind by criticism; To lead it away from serious reflections calculated to arouse resistance; To distract the forces of the mind towards a sham fight of empty eloquence.” -The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 24218469 United Kingdom09/23/2012 08:04 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 17090286 United States09/23/2012 08:05 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Isn't this looking at things backwards? Quoting: Anonymous Coward 24218469 Applying math to explain the Universe is an expression of human thought not Biblical. Just because 2+2=4 doesn't mean that something designed it that way simply that we have found the language capable of expressing it. Nice post though. Wrong conclusion. The Bible's "math code" is not used to explain the Universe. Human thought has not put the math (numerical seal) into the Bible, but was used by the author as a kind of watermark. If the code is so complicated that no human is capable of devising such a code - and as mathematical genius Ivan Vital claims it to be - the authorship of the Bible must be divine. This is the only logical conclusion to draw from such a numerical seal! Yet you discount many none devine sources from your logic. To claim divinity of origin you must first have absolute proof that the Devine exists, or one could simply say aliens did it. :sdaliens: LORD WILL THEY EVER SEE PAST THEIR OWN WRETCHED PRIDE? :itwashumans: |
