How is Romney a better choice than Obama???

I'll have to research Marxism as I'm not familiar with that.

Me either.

I thought he grew up in the states.....in fact I heard that Romney lived in Mexico with his family in the past.

Well, let's see....

Obama has "governed" (used most loosely) like it's Ferris Bueller's Day Off.

Romney has actually run businesses - at a profit.

Obama has never met anyone else's money he didn't spend.

Romney knows you cannot over-leverage.

Op,

Start thinking are you happy with the unemployment stats under communist obama and how more businesses re perishing because of obamacare, oppressive regulations, bailouts wanton closures of successful energy companies and support of government dictated and failing green companies instead of allowing the market thriving upon what will work.

Honestly son where are you confused and waffling are you employed and if not do you want to be or are you willing to follow puppet obama into the United Nations Agenda 21 and their Codex Alimentarius objectives.

Mitt Romney's father was born in Mexico. Mitt has lived in the US. Obama could be Kenyan, indonesian... he's lived in pakistan...

As another thread stated Obama could be great for a place like the UN but as an American, growing up as an American, not so much. He has been decidedly un-American in many of the things he does.

At times he doesn't salute our flag, doesn't wear the American pin, when he does salute the flag he and michelle use their left hands.

I just know Romney has been successful and Obama has made the US, in his 4 year tenure, worse off now than when he took office. That alone should let you decide.



Last Edited by A Friend on 11/05/2012 11:53 PM

Well that's where it get's very confusing for me because I work in the auto industry near Detroit. My feelings toward the unions is mixed. I think the unions can be good but at the same time they seem to protect some irresponsible individuals.
I know Romney is against the unions and if he get's in than how will that effect my job? His comment about letting detroit go bankrupt was upsetting, now he takes it back in a sense.
I don't know who to trust. I wish there was an "in-between" the two parties that combined some of the views from the left and from the right.

I don't think Obama did half bad on jobs over the past 4 years to be honest with you. I know everyone hates the statement I'm about to make but it is TRUE! Bush messed up the country big time! How could anyone be expected to turn the country around in only 4 years?

When he said the auto industry should be allowed to go bankrupt he meant it in the best business sense. They go bankrupt, they reorganize, keep the good and cut the fat. If they are being given handouts, how are they going to correct the problems which got them there in the first place?

People would never say this if Obama was a republican, never.

If you can't decide then cast your vote in favor of the internet. Romney and Co. are FOR SOPA which means a regulated tiered internet owned by ISPs. This means sites like GLP will be forced to pay upwards of 200k a year or be relegated to the "slow lane". Basically Romney will end the internet and free speech as we know it.

You mean like Regan did?

0bama hates white people

You have NO CHOICE

The candidates are hand picked by TPTB

The candidates will not change anything significant in the system

Free Trade which has killed our economy is okay with both

War - why not?

FED - nothing wrong with some private conglomerate of unknown people controlling monetary policy

TAXES - Bush tax cuts not going anywhere - Obama will have to "compromise" again Romney will just say "we rich folk create jobs"

JOB - both are globalists; both have no plan to bring manufacturing back to America


If Americans want to change America they have to stop believing in the system - the system is a lie.

This ^

[link to www.informationclearinghouse.info]


How Mormon Doctrine Shapes Romney’s World View

By Kirk Robinson

November 03, 2012 "Information Clearing House" - As Mormon missionaries in the 1960s, Mitt Romney and I were required to present six “discussions” to “investigators” before baptizing them – he in France and I in northern California. Central to those discussions was the “Plan of Salvation” (POS); and central to it, the “Doctrine of Eternal Progression.” These doctrines are also the essence of the Mormon temple “endowment ceremony” in which covenants of allegiance to God and the Church are made, accompanied by oaths of secrecy.

The doctrines are unique to Mormonism and absolutely central to it. There is no way that Mitt Romney’s view of the world cannot have been shaped by them, especially given the rather cloistered life he has lived. Together with passages of Mormon scripture, they imply several disturbingly retrograde political views that define the Republican-Tea Party:

* Women are subordinate to men.

* People of color are, or were, morally underdeveloped compared to white people.

* Gays cannot become gods, i.e., will be damned.

* The correct political philosophy is libertarianism.

* The best form of government fosters free-market capitalism with minimal regulatory oversight of business and industry.

* Earth is only a temporary home to be used as a stepping stone, not necessarily to be preserved or conserved.

* War in the Middle East is inevitable as part of God’s plan for “the last days.”

* Lying for the cause of righteousness, such as winning the election, is morally acceptable.

I will be honest. I think they both suck. And for the first time in my life, I will not be voting for president. I can't back either one of these idiots.

If GM automobiles are not desired by, the market how is propping the up by taxpayer’s money beneficial to our market. Without a doubt w need automobiles and do you not believe that we the consumer should decide what automobile is a viable option instead of the government cramming their choice down our throats.

If you work for a tax waster of a company or a new developed innovative company should be left to the consumer because ultimately freethinking has always led to innovation and advancement.

Look at the old communist Russia what had all their controls brought to them besides their downfall and their creative innovators lost to alcohol and drug abuse.