A blogger called "Justice denied" has asked: why did the police leave the abuser of Steven Meesham to go on to abuse more children for 25 years once Steven had pointed out to them the man in one of the photos he supplied to them?
[link to google-law.blogspot.co.uk]
Well, it was all part of the cover-up. But the more interesting question is this: Sian Griffiths, who worked for Clwyd Council in the inquiry office on the 1994 Jillings and six years later on the Waterhouse inquiry, which looked into the systematic abuse at the children’s homes, told ITV News that Steven's photos were ordered to be destroyed and that the police said they could not identify the faces of the men shown abusing children. This traps them in a lie, for how could they have originally told Meesham who the man he had pointed out was if none of the faces could be identifed?! They surely had access to the original statements, including what their colleagues had told Steven when he showed his photos to the police?

The blogger also mysteriously states that:
"It is now agreed that the abuser was in fact Lord McAlpine's, conveniently deceased, cousin, Afred James McAlpine
[link to www.thepeerage.com]
who lived in North Wales where his family had raped the countryside through Quarrying."
Agreed by whom? We now know that there are several candidate McAlpines who were living at the time in Wales and so why choose this one? Especially when he went by the name of Jimmy, whereas Steven said that his abuser was known as Tom, which is consistent with his abuser being his uncle Sir Thomas George Bishop McAlpine McAlpine,
[link to www.thepeerage.com]
who died in 1983.