WE FINALLY FOUND IT! Amateur astronomer has located Planet X in the sky!

Everyone knows you're a shill with software to detect anything regarding "non-mainstream" space theories.

You really should try another screen name, no one buys your shit.

The irony is that you're completely unaware as to how much *you're* being handled.

Why is it that we've never seen a photo of CW Leonis look like the image we see in that vid?

where/when it is going to happen aside....

...what no one mentions is that the astronomical probabilities that sitchin posits have been verified and backed by his own brother, an astro-physicist.

many of his books would not even have made it to the editor if he hadn't been backed by science. he, in fact, thanks his brother in his books saying that without him he would never have published.

declaring that that is impossible within the realm of science is simply declaring that you're not a scientist.

thats pretty cool if you ask me,

Sure I can. How? By having observed it for the last decade or more and witnessed the level of pure BS, misrepresented facts and outright lies it produces. Oh... and knowing just enough about astronomy to know horseshit when I see it. Also by witnessing the caliber of people who believe in it and the ridiculous things they believe for no good reason at all.



Sitchin's work is just made-up nonsense. AND... no orbit like he describes is possible. Either you know enough about astronomy to GET that, or you don't.



There is not. If you disagree, then present SPECIFICS, not vague innuendo.



I think you said it was a "nice presentation". I asked you what was "nice" about it. Funny... you didn't answer. Soooo typical.



Of course. You HAVE to in order to maintain belief. It is THE most important part of the Nibiru hoax.



I'm not, but don't worry about appologizing. Instead- LEARN SOME ASTRONOMY!



What do you expect me to offer? You are asking me to prove a negative. It is for you people who believe this thing exists to show evidence of that. Why don't you people ever GET that? YOU have to say what/where it is, because YOU say it exists. Only THEN can people show that your evidence is faulty. That has been done over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over again for over a DECADE now!

If you claim it exists, then SHOW WHY! I am willing to bet that you only end up fixating on a giant conspiracy, because you can't present ANYTHING concrete to verify its alleged existence.

You're welcome to point out where I have lied.

Right... and you're a wonderful person for supporting the Nibiru hoax.

Why?



Evidence of a hoax: The lie that a large planet can exist anywhere near the solar system which could only be seen in infrared.

hjmmm

You mean no one who has a fanatical belief in Nibiru will accept the reality he brings to the table.

Now you will cite where he proves that Sitchin's 3600 year repeating orbit into the inner solar system is possible.

Clearly, Nibiru has a cloaking device!

Because you never looked at it with the 2MASS layer of WWT before? Seriously though, the 2MASS mosaic on WWT sucks compared to the raw data. It's blotchy and pixelated, it's a lot better to get the raw fits data and process it yourself. That's always true of course, but it's especially true in this case. Here's what my processed version of the 2MASS image of CW Leonis looks like:
[link to i319.photobucket.com]
There are still seams from where separate images from the 2MASS survey were combined, but I don't think it's going too far for me to say that my processing of the raw data is better than microsoft's in every conceivable way. It's far higher resolution; this is like zooming in on CW Leonis nearly all the way in WWT. If you're wondering why Microsoft didn't do it the way I did it, ask them, but I did process it by hand which just isn't practical for the whole sky. Still, I think I could have done a better batch job then they did if I had their computer equipment. They really need to hire a dedicated astrophotographer to handle the sky survey image data.

Last Edited by Astromut on 12/06/2012 12:20 AM

He's mad I took the doom toys away.

Yeh, if only you could look there first. Ha

any conclusions yet?

There is no stop to this Nibiru nonsense!!!

I appreciate your expertise here, just keep doing what you're doing.

Did you think there was? :p

Ugh probably not.

More input, any conclusions.

I can always count on you astro, thanks for the info, wasn't too sure what I was looking at until you explained. Thanks again.

Wow I guess that is not a complement to the maker of the video?

There is no planet x, no niribu, bible was a load of bullshit.

Dude what?

Where are you getting this faked information?

He had no "astrophysicist brother"

None of Sitchens works were ever backed by "science"

Well the raw data is easily available from multiple websites, but if you're referring to Microsoft not wanting us to have access to better images... maybe there's some conspiracy at Microsoft to deliberately provide less than ideal quality stitched mosaics so that people will conspiracy monger regarding the problems and that will drive additional hits to their site as people gawk over pixelated low quality images. Just playing devil's advocate there for a second :)

then you need to go do some reading, you fucking shill

he absolutely had an astrophysicist brother, and he thanked him in the dedication to Genesis Revisited



stop contributing in way that expose your ignorance...it's not helping anyone...least of all yourself.

Last Edited by Mordier L'eft on 12/06/2012 03:03 PM