|
REPORT ABUSIVE REPLY
|
|
Message Subject
|
Hey, IDIOTS, don't you see that FOR THE FIRST TIME SINCE 1781, the Queen of England just took part in a GOVERNMENT meeting?
|
|
Poster Handle
|
Defj@m |
|
Post Content
|
...
Even if that were true and i'm not saying it's not possible, it wouldn't be done in the public eye. It would happen in secret and I doubt the entire cabinet would even find out about it. It certainly wouldn't put put on the BBC website under some guise of receiving commemorative place mats.
What amazed me is the conclusion you have personally jumped to about what this meeting really is about. Try and keep a truly open mind instead of getting blind sided into one particular possible outcome based on a single meeting that the queen is having.
Waking up is the easy part. Staying awake is somewhat more difficult.
Quoting: Defj@m I thought I would be the one more open minded exploring very plausible scenarios and you are the one closed minded not exploring such scenarios. Talking about meetings.....Have you heard of PNAC? Well, that meeting resulted in 9/11 and guess what? It was public. You must be new to all this and I can undertake it can be mind boggling. You will get a handle on it as time progresses, that is if there is time. A president once said that there is a conspiracy so monstrous that people will deny it even exists. No, i'm not new to any of this. Exploring possibilities in one thing. Jumping to conclusions without any hard evidence to back in up is another. For example; Which scientists have come out and said the mayans were far more advanced mathematically than we are in this day and age? Sure, i've heard lots of conspiracy theorists come out and say this, but scientists with any real credibility, no! They were advanced as far as early civilisations go. But by today's standards, No! Oh you mean the mainstream ones like Michio Kaku, a NWO stooge? I knew this was getting no where. When you are done Research Pierce Corbyn and so many others I can't even begin to mention. More importantly, your mind/heart connects dots and I can't help in that area. NASA for instance have said there is nothing to this date and I guess you believe them. If you do, you must believe they can start and stop earthquakes too? Now I wonder why they didn't stop the Japan earthquake or predict it......could it be that they didn't know? But they somewhat know bout this 21st that nothing will happen? Hmmmmmm! Anyway, nice talking to you and enjoy the rest of the day. I said credible scientists. You know, like the majority of mathematicians. If what you had said were true then it would be woven into every mathematicians mind. Credible sources these days seem to mean someone who came up with the idea and another few guys who like the idea and endorse it. Why not point some of the evidence as to why they were more advanced than we are instead of piss balling around claiming that I listen to NASA and michio kakface. Evidence to all these theories. Is that not what we are truly seeking, instead of some guys opinion that, although may seem convincing, has nothing tangible to back it up with other than a few other people's opinion. There's plenty of real scientists out there that aren't in the government or main stream medias pocket. Where's the evidence from all these people?
|
|
|
Please verify you're human:
|
|
|
Reason for reporting:
|
