I know smart people: this isn't one of them. He also doesn't write like a professional. What are his credentials, really? Doesn't 'read' as a psychologist to me.

He collects and projects the actions of a limited study group, his psychological patients, who are de facto neurotic, and paints a broad stroke onto a larger demographic, all self-identified homophiles. Like saying, because your friend is neurotic, then all friends are.

He also alleges mass brainwashing. I would say he's a power tripper, or has a saviour complex.

He uses moral terms like 'good', which is a religious term; it implies 'bad'.