|
REPORT COPYRIGHT VIOLATION IN REPLY
|
|
Message Subject
|
CHALLENGE TO EVOLUTIONISTS
|
|
Poster Handle
|
John Kimble |
|
Post Content
|
No, it isn't falsification. Did the discovery of the coelacanth or blood cells in dino bones cause anyone to stop believing in ToE? Not at all, though any other theory would be considered debunked at that point. If a theory predicts certain things cannot happen, but they are discovered to have happened, then that theory should be discarded. Yet there is nothing any evo will accept as proof against their theory, as these discoveries show. Even if a pterodon were to fly across their university campus, they would refuse to abandon ToE. That is the meaning of unfalsifiable.
Quoting: Keep2theCode How do coelacanth or blood cells in dino bones provide evidence against the mechanism of evolution? It doesn't. Species don't HAVE to adapt/evolve. Red blood cells in dino fossils only proofs that red blood cells can remain intact after millions of years, it has nothing to do with evolution but rather with the mechanism of fossilisation. A dog buried next to trilobites would infact disprove evolution cause evolution says life evolved from common ancestors. Trilobites are considered the ancestor for most vertebrates. If you would find a dog fossil (or any other fossil that is assumed to have formed millions of years after trilobites) that would mean animals didn't evolve from a common ancestor hence disproving one of the most fundamental principles of evolution.
|
|
|
Please verify you're human:
|
|
|
Reason for copyright violation:
|
