World War ll..Why is the European War covered more than the Pacific War?

But, the Americans were fighting an enemy that was fanical for their emperor. They were prepared to die. Plus, the area where they fought was hot and humid. My dead never got the smell of death out of his nostrils!

But, the Americans were fighting an enemy that was fanical(SP) for their emperor. They were prepared to die. Plus, the area where they fought was hot and humid. My dead never got the smell of death out of his nostrils!
[

good point op

Yes, very, very interesting!

Noone interesed,I see.

My guess is that many people during the 1940's era had close ties to Europe. For many their fathers and grandfathers were probably born in Europe. Most Americans during the 1940's didn't know alot about the Pacific or had close ties to any of the Islands.

In fact, all wars after that have been ignored for the most part. I am referring to Korea and Vietnam. Seems like the main focas is on the European war. Almost nothing is said about WWI.

This WWI of which you speak.... What is it? I have a Wii.

Maybe so. When one starts researching the Pacific, it is very interesting. The Japanese were a formidable enemy! I think the regular German soldier was a normal human! Whereas, the SS were fueled by drug addiction.The Japanese were raised to fight for their Emperor. He was God on earth.

Go make to your Wii! This doesn't concern you.

My thinking is the Allies needed to stomp out National Socialism in all its entirety. It was and still is the greatest threat still to the banking interests, fiat currency,false economics. Hitler was the only one to try and govern by the state the banking system. That was a big no no. Thus he and National Socialism had to go. And then the holocaust became the focal point for Germans born and unborn to inherit the guilt for generations based on a myth.

Democracy is and always will be bullshit.
51 percent get their way 49 percent get it up the ass.

More established meeja (ie fake) coverage in Eurape compared to the Pacific.

There weren't any Jews to liberate in the Pacific, so who cares.

Pacific war?

your premise in your thread title is incorrect. an incident is covered to the extent it affects others. the population density in europe at the time was about 100 times what it was in the pacific. the european theater affected more people. if you or your loved ones lived, fought, or died, in the pacific theater, then you yourself would "cover" the events in the pacific theater more. the european theater would not matter near as much to "you". so, as you can see, your opening question is just not even relevant.

Europe and russia was the main event of the show. All out war between countries that had been there for thousands of years.
Lots of borders being changed and extended and countries being toppled etc.

Yea you got pearl habour attacked by the japs, and then later on the japs kept trying to surrender, but President Truman, badly wanted to use the atomic bomb, practically just to show off to the world and the Russians. which of course you did and the rest is history.

And dont forget you took part in the european part of it in the end, so thats even more reason to concentrate on that area.

Well, as you just explained, to me it is!

All a misdirection.

Thread: I met Hitler in 1967

and supported by documentation

[link to www.amazon.com]