Godlike Productions - Conspiracy Forum
Users Online Now: 1,727 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 13,328
Pageviews Today: 18,200Threads Today: 3Posts Today: 102
12:09 AM


Rate this Thread

Absolute BS Crap Reasonable Nice Amazing
 

Circumcision and original sin

 
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 7138989
United States
02/25/2013 11:42 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Circumcision and original sin
[link to www.ice-age-ahead-iaa.ca]

"It is interesting to note that the writer of the allegory combines the effect of 'eating' fiction with the victims self-recognition of its nakedness. So the allegory is a sexual story then, isn't it? The term nakedness may have referred to the circumcision. The subject appears to have been a critical one in early times. The priests may have demanded the circumcision in ancient times of both men and women, and called this demand wisdom. The patriarch Abraham is said to have demanded it of all the men. But when the deed was done, most likely the victims could only see a gaunt nakedness. Something vital was suddenly missing. The loss had cut so deep that it had felt like a curse, because the loss that had been incurred could never be recovered. The victims of such a loss would live self-condemned, cursing their own stupidity, by which they had exiled themselves to a lower state of existence, a more primitive state of existence with no chance of going back. "
Anonymous Coward (OP)
User ID: 7138989
United States
02/25/2013 11:43 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Circumcision and original sin
"The Allegory of the Serpent may have been intended to illustrate the effects of the entire field of the fictions that interpose the free flowing of love. The circumcision was evidently a 'debated' topic in ancient times where the practice began, but which also may have been just one of many similar topics. The circumcision inhibits the flow of love, both of the victim to itself and to wards others."
Anonymous Coward (OP)
User ID: 7138989
United States
02/25/2013 11:43 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Circumcision and original sin
[link to www.circumcisioncomplex.com]
Anonymous Coward (OP)
User ID: 7138989
United States
02/25/2013 12:12 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Circumcision and original sin
[link to www.circumcisioncomplex.com]
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 35047860
02/25/2013 12:36 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Circumcision and original sin
Hahahahahaha!

What a load of utter, utter bullshit.

If 'receptor loss' from just a small area affects 'concrete thinking', then why oh why can Stephen Hawking, who has MOTOR NEURON disease, attain such a high level of 'concrete thinking' as required in advanced mathematics and physics? The article goes on to say it causes 'detachment from reality'. How would Professor Hawking even be able to confront the NATURE of reality with such a detachment. Later still it says 'accurateness of discrimination'? Surely Professor Hawking has a great ability to discriminate.


What a load of pseudo-science psycho-babble bullshit. The article offers no links to any sort of study to confirm it's hypothesis WHATSOEVER. It is ALL conjecture.

Thanks for the LULZ!! :)
Anonymous Coward (OP)
User ID: 7138989
United States
02/25/2013 12:43 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Circumcision and original sin
Because the foreskin is not just a piece of skin but the most sensitive part of the penis. The neurons are "pleasure specificed" and not just any ordinary neuron.
Anonymous Coward (OP)
User ID: 7138989
United States
02/25/2013 12:46 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Circumcision and original sin
The foreskin is essential for couple bonding and therefore circumcision has not only sexual effects but also psycho-social.
Anonymous Coward (OP)
User ID: 7138989
United States
02/25/2013 12:51 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Circumcision and original sin
one would have to read the rest of the website anyways, which explains further.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 35047860
02/25/2013 01:05 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Circumcision and original sin
Because the foreskin is not just a piece of skin but the most sensitive part of the penis. The neurons are "pleasure specificed" and not just any ordinary neuron.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 7138989


You poor gullible fool.

The glans is the most sensitive part of the penis, not the foreskin. Surely losing sensitivity in most of your body, including your entire penis, would be more serious and have more of the deleterious effect described in the article than a mere foreskin? And did I mention the lack of any referenced medical studies?

No, I don't think I will read any more of their vacuous prevarications, thankyou.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 30366502
02/25/2013 01:09 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Circumcision and original sin
The foreskin is essential for couple bonding and therefore circumcision has not only sexual effects but also psycho-social.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 7138989


It certainly makes jerkit a lot easier and more fun! I couldn't imagine having to use friction and lotion!!
Anonymous Coward (OP)
User ID: 7138989
United States
02/25/2013 01:15 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Circumcision and original sin
Because the foreskin is not just a piece of skin but the most sensitive part of the penis. The neurons are "pleasure specificed" and not just any ordinary neuron.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 7138989


You poor gullible fool.

The glans is the most sensitive part of the penis, not the foreskin. Surely losing sensitivity in most of your body, including your entire penis, would be more serious and have more of the deleterious effect described in the article than a mere foreskin? And did I mention the lack of any referenced medical studies?

No, I don't think I will read any more of their vacuous prevarications, thankyou.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 35047860


Sensitive to what? The glans often hurts and does not feel pleasure at least not as much as the foreskin.

I think this assumption needs to be looked at. Perceptions may have been colored due to the prevalence of circumcision to tell people that the foreskin has no value.
Anonymous Coward (OP)
User ID: 7138989
United States
02/25/2013 01:24 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Circumcision and original sin
"Some people assert that the mucous membranes of their genitalia can experience taste-like sensations. Others can feel electric fields or bioenergy from a distance. Different ESP phenomena including the so called finger-reading that is the ability of the skin to sense images and colours show how little we know about perception. The multivaluence sensitivty of the free nerve endings may be responsible for these fine sensitivities. But the other types of cutaneous receptors may be also involved. Most probably all of us have such extraordinary sensitivities without realizing them because we are equipped with the same receptors. The greater art of the action of somatosensory system is unconscious. It is possible that mucous membranes not only secrete sex hormones but are able to detect them. This only comes to show that we don't know what we cut off with the foreskin.

Can you describe the electricity of a kiss by the pressure, vibrations, temperature and taste that accompany it? Maybe you could but the description would be unsatisfactory.

Even if the action of receptors was known the human feelings coud be reduced because perceptions form in the brain."
Anonymous Coward (OP)
User ID: 7138989
United States
02/25/2013 02:24 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Circumcision and original sin
[link to www.circumcisioncomplex.com]
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 19160070
United States
02/25/2013 02:34 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Circumcision and original sin
history.
good stuff, you should look into it.
Anonymous Coward (OP)
User ID: 7138989
United States
02/25/2013 02:46 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Circumcision and original sin
Freud Circumcised.
[link to www.booksie.com]

Freud's Oedipal complex is a fictitous hoax; he suffered from a circumcision complex of being weaned away from the familiarity of comfort called his mother land, and being subject to the victimization of the law of the father, in an alien father land.

News