Circumcision and original sin

"The Allegory of the Serpent may have been intended to illustrate the effects of the entire field of the fictions that interpose the free flowing of love. The circumcision was evidently a 'debated' topic in ancient times where the practice began, but which also may have been just one of many similar topics. The circumcision inhibits the flow of love, both of the victim to itself and to wards others."

[link to www.circumcisioncomplex.com]

[link to www.circumcisioncomplex.com]

Hahahahahaha!

What a load of utter, utter bullshit.

If 'receptor loss' from just a small area affects 'concrete thinking', then why oh why can Stephen Hawking, who has MOTOR NEURON disease, attain such a high level of 'concrete thinking' as required in advanced mathematics and physics? The article goes on to say it causes 'detachment from reality'. How would Professor Hawking even be able to confront the NATURE of reality with such a detachment. Later still it says 'accurateness of discrimination'? Surely Professor Hawking has a great ability to discriminate.


What a load of pseudo-science psycho-babble bullshit. The article offers no links to any sort of study to confirm it's hypothesis WHATSOEVER. It is ALL conjecture.

Thanks for the LULZ!! :)

Because the foreskin is not just a piece of skin but the most sensitive part of the penis. The neurons are "pleasure specificed" and not just any ordinary neuron.

The foreskin is essential for couple bonding and therefore circumcision has not only sexual effects but also psycho-social.

one would have to read the rest of the website anyways, which explains further.

You poor gullible fool.

The glans is the most sensitive part of the penis, not the foreskin. Surely losing sensitivity in most of your body, including your entire penis, would be more serious and have more of the deleterious effect described in the article than a mere foreskin? And did I mention the lack of any referenced medical studies?

No, I don't think I will read any more of their vacuous prevarications, thankyou.

It certainly makes a lot easier and more fun! I couldn't imagine having to use friction and lotion!!

Sensitive to what? The glans often hurts and does not feel pleasure at least not as much as the foreskin.

I think this assumption needs to be looked at. Perceptions may have been colored due to the prevalence of circumcision to tell people that the foreskin has no value.

"Some people assert that the mucous membranes of their genitalia can experience taste-like sensations. Others can feel electric fields or bioenergy from a distance. Different ESP phenomena including the so called finger-reading that is the ability of the skin to sense images and colours show how little we know about perception. The multivaluence sensitivty of the free nerve endings may be responsible for these fine sensitivities. But the other types of cutaneous receptors may be also involved. Most probably all of us have such extraordinary sensitivities without realizing them because we are equipped with the same receptors. The greater art of the action of somatosensory system is unconscious. It is possible that mucous membranes not only secrete sex hormones but are able to detect them. This only comes to show that we don't know what we cut off with the foreskin.

Can you describe the electricity of a kiss by the pressure, vibrations, temperature and taste that accompany it? Maybe you could but the description would be unsatisfactory.

Even if the action of receptors was known the human feelings coud be reduced because perceptions form in the brain."

[link to www.circumcisioncomplex.com]

history.
good stuff, you should look into it.

Freud Circumcised.
[link to www.booksie.com]

Freud's Oedipal complex is a fictitous hoax; he suffered from a circumcision complex of being weaned away from the familiarity of comfort called his mother land, and being subject to the victimization of the law of the father, in an alien father land.

hawking is a mind-controlled puppet

Circumcision is not a decision any parents should be allowed to make on their children, period.

If someone wants to snip away part some of his most sensitive part of the body later in life, he can do it.

Parents doing this is the most brutal form of oppressing their will onto their children, without any way to rectify it later in life.

The children should be given legal support to sue such parents and the doctors involved, unless they can prove there were imminent medical reasons for such an intervention.

www.circumcisioncomplex.com/original-sin-neurosis/ The Original Sin Neurosis

Two-thirds of the world's population is uncircumcised.

I wonder how many God-haters and religion haters defend this religious custom.

We miss you, Chris!