Why do terrorists alway target civilians? | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 9742629 United States 07/11/2013 09:36 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 23467366 United Kingdom 07/11/2013 09:37 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 10401141 United States 07/11/2013 09:37 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | If terrorists are mad at foreign governments, why is it always the civilians they target and not the governments themselves? Quoting: rexxturbo Because a loss of a soldiers life is "acceptable", or at least MORE acceptable. The figting often occur on battlefields, which limit to some extent the exposure of civillians. When you attack the civillian population, You strike right at the country's ability to function. look at 9/11, air traffic shut down for weeks, economy stagnated immediately etc. etc. It's a visible attack that forces the government of that country to make changes, (patriot act). A soldier dying might induce a training change, or better equipment, but that's about it. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 42537488 Slovakia 07/11/2013 09:37 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 42537488 Slovakia 07/11/2013 09:38 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 42785961 United States 07/11/2013 09:39 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | EXAMPLE: Taliban hiding in Pakistan mountains They get droned attacked a lot So they start blowing up bombs in Pakistan markets, saying they will keep doing so until Pakistan government stops allowing US drones to attack eventually the civilians get upset with Government for not just meeting terrorists demands, as they have nothing to lose being civilians and would rather not be blown up It's pretty simple |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 41064841 Canada 07/11/2013 09:39 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
rexxturbo (OP) User ID: 15690235 United States 07/11/2013 09:42 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | If terrorists are mad at foreign governments, why is it always the civilians they target and not the governments themselves? Quoting: rexxturbo Because a loss of a soldiers life is "acceptable", or at least MORE acceptable. The figting often occur on battlefields, which limit to some extent the exposure of civillians. When you attack the civillian population, You strike right at the country's ability to function. look at 9/11, air traffic shut down for weeks, economy stagnated immediately etc. etc. It's a visible attack that forces the government of that country to make changes, (patriot act). A soldier dying might induce a training change, or better equipment, but that's about it. Why not gov. institutions? or gov. civilian employees? |
rexxturbo (OP) User ID: 15690235 United States 07/11/2013 09:42 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
rexxturbo (OP) User ID: 15690235 United States 07/11/2013 09:45 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | EXAMPLE: Quoting: Anonymous Coward 42785961 Taliban hiding in Pakistan mountains They get droned attacked a lot So they start blowing up bombs in Pakistan markets, saying they will keep doing so until Pakistan government stops allowing US drones to attack eventually the civilians get upset with Government for not just meeting terrorists demands, as they have nothing to lose being civilians and would rather not be blown up It's pretty simple You become worse than your enemy. kind of goes against being a freedom fighter. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 43198003 United States 07/11/2013 09:47 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 10401141 United States 07/11/2013 09:47 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | If terrorists are mad at foreign governments, why is it always the civilians they target and not the governments themselves? Quoting: rexxturbo Because a loss of a soldiers life is "acceptable", or at least MORE acceptable. The figting often occur on battlefields, which limit to some extent the exposure of civillians. When you attack the civillian population, You strike right at the country's ability to function. look at 9/11, air traffic shut down for weeks, economy stagnated immediately etc. etc. It's a visible attack that forces the government of that country to make changes, (patriot act). A soldier dying might induce a training change, or better equipment, but that's about it. Why not gov. institutions? or gov. civilian employees? Pentagon 9/11 The effect is the same, which asks why a terrorist would risk the increased security around such a target. If you could get the same effect at less risk of failure, you would be crazy to attack the tougher target. Look at the Oklahoma City bombing. It was a federal building, but that was because he had a bone to pick with that particular target. Now think about what was reported, people were MORE upset because there was a daycare center there. You want the most effect, you attack either the emotional (children) or the substructure (financial WTC) |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 43198003 United States 07/11/2013 09:48 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | If terrorists are mad at foreign governments, why is it always the civilians they target and not the governments themselves? Quoting: rexxturbo Because a loss of a soldiers life is "acceptable", or at least MORE acceptable. The figting often occur on battlefields, which limit to some extent the exposure of civillians. When you attack the civillian population, You strike right at the country's ability to function. look at 9/11, air traffic shut down for weeks, economy stagnated immediately etc. etc. It's a visible attack that forces the government of that country to make changes, (patriot act). A soldier dying might induce a training change, or better equipment, but that's about it. Why not gov. institutions? or gov. civilian employees? Timothy McVeigh did. I have yet to hear one person say he was some sort of noble terrorist for doing so. Nor did it serve his cause in any way, shape or form |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 21061993 Ireland 07/11/2013 09:49 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 41869971 United States 07/11/2013 09:49 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 43197424 Malaysia 07/11/2013 09:49 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 2226485 United States 07/11/2013 09:54 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
rexxturbo (OP) User ID: 15690235 United States 07/11/2013 10:02 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 23467366 United Kingdom 07/11/2013 10:02 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
rexxturbo (OP) User ID: 15690235 United States 07/11/2013 10:05 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | If terrorists are mad at foreign governments, why is it always the civilians they target and not the governments themselves? Quoting: rexxturbo Because a loss of a soldiers life is "acceptable", or at least MORE acceptable. The figting often occur on battlefields, which limit to some extent the exposure of civillians. When you attack the civillian population, You strike right at the country's ability to function. look at 9/11, air traffic shut down for weeks, economy stagnated immediately etc. etc. It's a visible attack that forces the government of that country to make changes, (patriot act). A soldier dying might induce a training change, or better equipment, but that's about it. Why not gov. institutions? or gov. civilian employees? Pentagon 9/11 The effect is the same, which asks why a terrorist would risk the increased security around such a target. If you could get the same effect at less risk of failure, you would be crazy to attack the tougher target. Look at the Oklahoma City bombing. It was a federal building, but that was because he had a bone to pick with that particular target. Now think about what was reported, people were MORE upset because there was a daycare center there. You want the most effect, you attack either the emotional (children) or the substructure (financial WTC) Lets say the attacks came from the middle east. All it acomplished was to bring more heat, troops, death back to the middle east area. The terrorists are losing more freedoms. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 42964619 United States 07/11/2013 10:13 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
rexxturbo (OP) User ID: 109891 United States 07/11/2013 10:16 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Because the so called terrorists are actually the government intelligence organizations pushing the agenda of fear at the behest of the world bankers. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 42964619 Elementary my dear Watson. Yea, Im just trying to remove contradictions from my reality. Last Edited by rexxturbo on 07/11/2013 10:16 AM |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 42964619 United States 07/11/2013 10:20 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Because the so called terrorists are actually the government intelligence organizations pushing the agenda of fear at the behest of the world bankers. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 42964619 Elementary my dear Watson. Yea, Im just trying to remove contradictions from my reality. Understood. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 23467366 United Kingdom 07/11/2013 10:24 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Because the so called terrorists are actually the government intelligence organizations pushing the agenda of fear at the behest of the world bankers. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 42964619 Elementary my dear Watson. Yea, Im just trying to remove contradictions from my reality. I come from the land of the creepy news actor (no, not the UK, lol). I've seen people I personally know attached to a shit ton of crap that has hit the media. Either the world is reallllly reallllllyyy tiny, or it's all pre-scripted bullshit. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 43125135 United States 07/11/2013 10:26 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
rexxturbo (OP) User ID: 109891 United States 07/11/2013 10:31 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Because the so called terrorists are actually the government intelligence organizations pushing the agenda of fear at the behest of the world bankers. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 42964619 Elementary my dear Watson. Yea, Im just trying to remove contradictions from my reality. I come from the land of the creepy news actor (no, not the UK, lol). I've seen people I personally know attached to a shit ton of crap that has hit the media. Either the world is reallllly reallllllyyy tiny, or it's all pre-scripted bullshit. Sounds interesting, would you mind elaborating? |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 38940141 United States 07/11/2013 10:39 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 23467366 United Kingdom 07/11/2013 10:44 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Because the so called terrorists are actually the government intelligence organizations pushing the agenda of fear at the behest of the world bankers. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 42964619 Elementary my dear Watson. Yea, Im just trying to remove contradictions from my reality. I come from the land of the creepy news actor (no, not the UK, lol). I've seen people I personally know attached to a shit ton of crap that has hit the media. Either the world is reallllly reallllllyyy tiny, or it's all pre-scripted bullshit. Sounds interesting, would you mind elaborating? Long story. Short of it: Raised in CIA training land. Watched people learn how to become believable "street actors" (i.e. believable acting - think witnesses in the news or the guy you meet on the street). Saw some of the behind the scenes prep work for some of the major events that have "impacted how the nation thinks"... not comfortable getting into half of it. They were major events and even though I was young and just a witness, I don't want to place myself there. I'll talk openly all day about weird stuff - but when it comes to those events my brain screams Danger Danger. I often see people from home in major news - as witnesses for the Batman shooting, as key actors in the beginning stages and control stages of occupy, as some of the actors in the CT school shooting, etc,etc,etc,etc. These are people I grew up with, spent significant time with, know the mannerisms of, know the beliefs of, etc - it would be like if your best friend popped up on tv - it's not "Oh that sort of looks like Clareese", it's more like "Oh wow, looks like Clareese got involved in that one". |
Arete11 User ID: 8545334 United States 07/11/2013 10:58 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
rexxturbo (OP) User ID: 100741 United States 07/11/2013 11:05 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I come from the land of the creepy news actor (no, not the UK, lol). I've seen people I personally know attached to a shit ton of crap that has hit the media. Either the world is reallllly reallllllyyy tiny, or it's all pre-scripted bullshit. Sounds interesting, would you mind elaborating? Long story. Short of it: Raised in CIA training land. Watched people learn how to become believable "street actors" (i.e. believable acting - think witnesses in the news or the guy you meet on the street). Saw some of the behind the scenes prep work for some of the major events that have "impacted how the nation thinks"... not comfortable getting into half of it. They were major events and even though I was young and just a witness, I don't want to place myself there. I'll talk openly all day about weird stuff - but when it comes to those events my brain screams Danger Danger. I often see people from home in major news - as witnesses for the Batman shooting, as key actors in the beginning stages and control stages of occupy, as some of the actors in the CT school shooting, etc,etc,etc,etc. These are people I grew up with, spent significant time with, know the mannerisms of, know the beliefs of, etc - it would be like if your best friend popped up on tv - it's not "Oh that sort of looks like Clareese", it's more like "Oh wow, looks like Clareese got involved in that one". I guess you are lucky to have been aware so long ago. I cant imagine if I knew what I know now 15 years ago. Im sure its not easy to deal with however. |