Who were the 9/11 workers who actually did (not planned) the demolition?

Just a hunch..

1st rule of any planned assassination is to kill the assassin.

So they can't speak...I'm guessing they were taken care of long befor 9/11...most likely as soon as the buildings were wired.

I saw somewhere that Mossad had offices in one of the towers.

Possibly blackwater?

Great question though.

Most people just don't get the fact that secrets CAN be kept. The Manhattan Project encompassed more than 100,000 people and no word was leaked. 9/11 would have required far less than 1000 direct participants.

People's entire lives are trained to handle such events, intelligence agencies, "defense" contractors etc. The people are soulless robots just carrying out orders.


With all that said, the hardest part for people to get over when they realize someone had to have been planting explosives is the fact that they believe it would be incomprehensible and that these people [demolition people] must feel bad. The problem with this guilty conscience assumption is that it's baseless and just that, an assumption, just because the average person is for the most part moral, and wouldn't participate in mass murder, corporations around the world DAILY commit mass murder for profits or power.

Corporations, and Government, are willing to sacrifice people for a "greater good", be that, profit and power for their shareholders, or to drive an agenda forward.

At the end of the day, the only thing that matters in regards to 9/11 truth is the fact that the official conspiracy theory, put forth by the treasonous Government, is 100% fully debunked. The "who/what/where/when/why" are really irrelevant until the majority of people know they've been lied to.

and how could they be persuaded to knowingly commit mass murder?
Not of course, by now they are all suicided.

Mossad

Wasn't there lots of 'building work' going on inside the towers in the months leading up to 911?

No Jews died. Just 2700+ subhuman gentiles.

Who are the most likely suspects.

Yes -- but particularly during the week (or so) immediately preceding 9/11. PLEASE see the video. (I am not computer savvy enough to post the link, but it is on You Tube if you search "911 Mysteries Part 1 Demolitions.)

The people working on the renovations some months before.

They included respraying concrete on the supporting beams.

The problem is that thermite and fire proofing cement look almost identical and if the foreigners doing the labor were not experienced they wouldnt know that they were spraying on thermite and not cement.

That's the beauty of it, it only takes a few insiders to do this and later set igniter devices to initiate the thermite.

That's why the wreckage smoldered for weeks in spite of a million gallons of water being poured on it.
Nothing else gets that hot.

Yes, initially they talked about it openly, then later they scrubbed the net of all references, only a few screenshots of the anouncment are left and now they deny that anything at all of the sort existed and now they play dumb about it.
This was a major revision of 911 history.

every corporate employee works under what's called a Non Disclosure Agreement.

Legally, they agree to do whatever the fuck their boss tells them -- compliance is written into the wording of their contract.

Why SHOULD they expose themselves to 'contract breaking'? Them's some serious (legal) repercussions, they'd face. Huuuuuuuuuuuuuuuge fines.

And FINES is what keeps us all schtum.

A lot of building contractors would have to have set up the WTC's 1, 2 and 7 ... unless it was 'some other external technology like 'nuke under the basement' or 'space beam' or ... name that fuckin' shit.

It happened and SOMEONE DID IT, on a VERY BIG CORPORATION scale i.e. USA is a corporation, UK is a corporation, Canada is a corporations, as is France Israel Germany.................... it'll be potentially a massive blame list.

Wow, talk about serendipity!!

Thanks to the comments about Mossad, I Googled "Mossad and 9/11" and came across the following article POSTED JUST TWO DAYS AGO!

It explores in depth the "Mossad theory" . . . and, people, I have to tell you -- it gave me plenty of consider.

I apologize for not being able to provide a link, but if anyone wants to explore this article, the title and most of the first paragraph follow (bold and italics are mine):

“Was 9/11 an Inside Job, or a Mossad Job?”
by LAURENT GUYENOT JULY 16, 2013

The role of the Israeli Deep State in the Sept. 11th terror attacks, which have laid the foundation for the 21st century on the biggest lie in human history, is surrounded by a taboo even within the so-called 9/11 Truth Movement. Most activists groups remain focused on the slogan “9/11 was an Inside Job”, and keep their eyes “wide shut” on the evidence incriminating the secret services of the Jewish State.

Warning: The article is long and detailed, but I think that it might be worth your time to read.

If anyone has any thoughts or opinions about the case that Guyenot presents, I would be very glad to read them.

[link to www.google.com]

Mossad

Thanks for the link!!

Well, speculation PROVES nothing.

Those who DID THIS, and it didn't demolish itself because of fucking 'office fires' (it just didn't), they KNOW what they did.

They're shameless fucking pussies for whom no amount of ridicule will never be enough, but that's life i.e. full of queerfuckers who'll kill your ass for $$$

aka PROFIT, it's the whole PROFIT-making game You The People are STILL refusing to admit you're IMPRISONED BY.

Daily.

9/11 happened because DOLLAR BILL.

Most participants in secret ops have no knowledge of the extent of the operation (the full picture)they are involved in.

They may be planting a bomb but think it is a data transmitter or a dummy device.

Someone may be part of an operation but only as a diversion. And they know only their small part.

Compartmentalization of knowledge is a key factor in the structure of modern secret operations.

I also believe tho I have no proof that there exist forms of mind control that can cause people to forget things.

I think 9/11 was an ongoing plan for several decades.

At most today, theres 3 people left alive that know the whole sinister plan.

Jus me sayin...

You mean like the way the WALLS WERE FIREPROOFED with that red nanothermite paint on those relevant floors prior to The 9/11 Event?

Or the liftshafts were 'renovated'?

Or the EMPTY FLOORS and the Israel Art Student installation?

All or any of this shit could be COVER STORY for what really happened and ONLY THE PEOPLE WHO DID IT will know, even if they were 'part of the cell-mind structure of the operation' they'll know TODAY (if they're alive) if they were paid to DO IT or not.

They'll know.

This is how. Spot on.

Kosher gremlins.

I wonder if there is a mind control technology that would not only cause loss of memories but to have new memories put in their place?

If there exists some such ability, it would be the perfect crucial technology to enable an operation of this scope, I think. Again, I have no proof, i'm just trying to understand how a operation of this size goes live and the majority of sheep just fall into place in believing the official story. MSM is totally complicit. Virtually all politicians act like robots. Of all the people I know personally, I cannot talk to one who believes anything but the total official story. Its maddening being in this bubble of knowing.



Answers would be great but why arent the majority of people even questioning the offial BS story

Last Edited by 1066 on 07/18/2013 02:21 PM

you would have to go back to the 1960s when the construction began

Most people are not educated enough in the topics to thing for themselves and dont comprehend the many glaring inconsistencies and impossiblities. One of the greatest is that the impact site was cool enough for surviviors to look out the impact hole, but somehow the metal melted enough to collapse the structure.
People are stupid, knowledge isnt taught nor is any critical thinking.

television

I only have one question

WHERE THE FUCK IS JUSTICE IN THE LAND OF THE FREE?

Probably a faction of the CIA and/or Mossad. And to answer your question about how could they do it: They'd have to be human before they could worry about the number of people their handiwork would eventually kill, and they don't qualify.

The name of the judge that's handling all these 9/11 cases is Hellerstein.

That should answer your question.

[link to www.bollyn.com]

Click the link.

They can now talk to the Jesuit pope by Twitter and he will forgive them?

Jesuit? What do they do?
Clearly they cannot be Christians if they dont follow Christs teachings, so the only question becomes who are they pretending to be Christians for and why are they making war by deception?

No it doesn't. It made a series of provably false assumptions.

Video Claim: The towers would have survived the impact of the planes on 911.


Lets listen to the *rest* of what DeMartini had to say on the topic on why he didn’t think the WTC would collapse if hit by a 707:


“because this structure is like the mosquito netting on your screen door - this intense grid - and the jet plane is just a pencil puncturing that screen netting. It really does nothing to the screen netting."


As the severed outer panels and severely deformed inner columns demonstrate quite elegantly, yes the plane does do damage to the netting. Catastrophic damage.

Demartini also didn’t have a thing to do with the construction of the WTC. The WTC was began construction in 1965. DeMartini died in 2001 at the age of 49. That means he would have been 13 when the WTC began. And if you believe that they made a 13 year old the Construction Manager of the world’s tallest buildings at the time….I have some swamp land in Florida I’d love to sell you.

Also, Demartini was in the WTC when it was hit. He inspected the columns and outer panels immediately below the impact zone immediately after the plane hit the tower. And he reported no explosives…despite the system of explosives that would have been necessary to take down the WTC being extensive , involving tens of thousands of charges.

Further, the *actual* designer of the WTC Leslie Robertson , who was there when the WTC was constructed indicated it wasn’t designed to withstand an impact of the magnitude it received. The 757 that hit the WTC was far larger and more massive than the 707 and hit at a speed far higher than what the WTC had been designed to withstand.

More mass plus more speed equals MUCH more energy.

And then there was the fire. The WTC wasn’t designed to burn with massive quantities of accelerant spread across half a dozen floors simultaneously. Per Robertson, the WTC didn’t have a fire suppression system that could have possibly withstood that fire. And it was the fire that ultimately doomed the WTC. Not simply the initial impact.

Video Claim: Where are the cores at ground zero?

Into the 9 story debris pile with the outer panels and all the rest of WTC 1 and 2.

First off,. The core wasn’t ‘indestructible’ Nothing is. The premise offered by the youtube video is comically inaccurate. And the core didn’t ‘disapear’. It collapsed *after* the outer panels did. The youtube video shows a grand total of ONE picture of a small portion of the debris, and then concludes that the core disappeared.

That’s nonsense. There are pictures galore of the core columns in the debris field. Instantly debunking their theory that the core ‘disappeared’. And that it was ‘indestructible’.

And remember, the premise that the core ‘disappeared’ is the beating heart of the entire video. Yet the assertion is provablely false. The core columns are in the debris.

The video makers just don’t know what they are talking about.


Video Claim: Fires not hot enough to melt steel

You don’t have to turn the steel into a liquid before a steel structure will collapse. Heating steel weakens it. Steel will lose its structural integrity *long* before it turns into a liquid. At 1800F, steel has already lost 90% of its structural integrity.


"Steel loses about 50 percent of its strength at 1100°F," notes senior engineer Farid Alfawak-hiri of the American Institute of Steel Construction. "And at 1800° it is probably at less than 10 percent." NIST also believes that a great deal of the spray-on fireproofing insulation was likely knocked off the steel beams that were in the path of the crashing jets, leaving the metal more vulnerable to the heat.

[link to www.popularmechanics.com]


The idea that steel must be a liquid before it can collapse is false. Thus, the ‘melting point’ of steel is irrelevant. The weakening of the steel as it is heated is relevant.

How do the makers of the video reconcile this fact with their claims regarding ‘melted steel’? They don’t. They ignore it. And no one is obligated to ignore what some random youtube video does when assessing what actually happened.

And then there’s the elephant in the livingroom: explosives and fire don’t play well together.

The fires burning *more* than hot enough to destroy any explosive demolition system we’ve ever invented. Blasting charges would have exploded, detonators detonated, timers or remote receivers melted into bubbling pools of plastic in the midst of these massive fires. There’s a very good reason why we don’t do explosive demolition on a burning building.

How to the creators of the video resolve this *enormous* problem with their theory? They ignore it and pretend it doesn't exist.

If only reality worked that way. And that’s just the tip of the iceberg. The videos assertions on the collapse being ‘just like explosive demolition’ is wrong. The video laughably contradicts itself…..asserting that explosive demolition blew out enormous chunks of the building…..then positing that it was actually thermite that *melted* the steel.

Um, guys…thermite doesn’t explode. It burns. Killing your ‘explosive demolition’ theory.

And its claims against Silverstein are laughable, contradicting themselves again. First off, in the quote of telling ‘them’ to ‘pull it’,…who was Silverstein talking to?

That’s right, the FDNY. They are the people the video accuses of ‘pulling’ WTC 7…if you follow the videos ridiculous logic. Problem is, the FDNY doesn’t do demolitions. They never have. So why would they suddenly start on 911? And start on a *burning* building? It makes no sense. And if the FDNY was in on 911, why then did 343 of its member’s die in the collapses? Another truck sized hole.

Worse, ‘Pulling’ a building is quite literal. They attach cables to the building, attach other bulldozers and literally ‘pull’ small buildings over. But that’s not what the video says happened to WTC 7, is it? The video debunks itself on that claim.

What Silverstein was referring to was pulling the fire fighting effort. Something the FDNY *can* do. Something the FDNY did. And referred to the end of their efforts as ‘pulling’ the firefighters out.

Oh, and its not just the NY Times that say that the WTC 7 ‘burned like a giant torch’. The FDNY backs this as well, pulling their firefighting efforts *hours* before the building’s collapse. They watched the building burn, measured its structural failure and correctly predicted its collapse by more than 3 hours.

All of which your video makers know. But *really* hope you don’t.

Sorry guys, but the video’s ‘explosive demolition’ theory just doesn’t work. And you don’t need workers to plant imaginary explosives.

2 foot by 2 foot 2 inch thick tempered steel box beams wouldnt have been barely scratched by an 1/4 inch aluminum airframe hitting them after going through the concrete facade, it would have been like a snowball hitting a tree.

Most of the fuel burned off in the fireball in a second or two, not much left to burn, and the impact site was cool enough for people in the building to look out the hole and signal for rescue, so it must not have been that hot on that floor or below.