Godlike Productions - Discussion Forum
Users Online Now: 1,834 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 730,372
Pageviews Today: 948,930Threads Today: 242Posts Today: 3,363
08:11 AM


Rate this Thread

Absolute BS Crap Reasonable Nice Amazing
 

How long will WW3 last with ONLY conventional weapons? And who wins?

 
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 33689832
Canada
09/08/2013 06:58 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
How long will WW3 last with ONLY conventional weapons? And who wins?
if no nukes are ever used then how long can it last?
usa, uk, europe vs china, russia and arabs.
who do you think will win with only using conventional weapons.hiding
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 46594144
Canada
09/09/2013 08:38 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: How long will WW3 last with ONLY conventional weapons? And who wins?
CNN bullshit is still claiming that Assad used chemical weapons without any evidence.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 46595019
Brazil
09/09/2013 10:25 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: How long will WW3 last with ONLY conventional weapons? And who wins?
Assad is against the use of WMD's.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 46605000
Canada
09/09/2013 10:40 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: How long will WW3 last with ONLY conventional weapons? And who wins?
if no nukes are ever used then how long can it last?
usa, uk, europe vs china, russia and arabs.
who do you think will win with only using conventional weapons.hiding
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 33689832


Until the gas runs out or something blows up the Saudi Oil wells and flatten the Oil sands in Canada.

Then, once the gas runs out, then the nukes come out.

I believe the last estimates were two weeks if a World War broke out. THink the world consumes alot of oil now? Wait until all the military equipment is rolled out for 200 million men and women.

There would be only one option left...nukes.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 46594144
Canada
09/09/2013 10:49 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: How long will WW3 last with ONLY conventional weapons? And who wins?
We have to raise skepticism.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 25687053
United States
09/09/2013 10:52 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: How long will WW3 last with ONLY conventional weapons? And who wins?
it will last until all known records of bankster fuckery have been located and destroyed
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 27337211
United States
09/09/2013 11:05 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: How long will WW3 last with ONLY conventional weapons? And who wins?
if no nukes are ever used then how long can it last?
usa, uk, europe vs china, russia and arabs.
who do you think will win with only using conventional weapons.hiding
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 33689832


In 1987 the Russians had about 2,500 long-range missiles, ICBM and SLBM and 9,847 warheads. The total has been reduced but they could easily re-arm 2000+ missiles with conventional multi-warhead payloads.

The USA has less than 1/3 of what the Russians have. We wouldn't stand a chance against Russia in a MISSLE to Missile shootout.

Why do ya think Reagan wanted to develop a StarWars Laser system? Its because we are out gunned over 2 to 1.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 46488057
Australia
09/09/2013 11:09 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: How long will WW3 last with ONLY conventional weapons? And who wins?
It would probably last 4-6 years.

American air power would last as long as its carriers, which would eventually be sunk by a combination of Silkworm and Iskander missiles (notwithstanding the occasional lucky sub). The US has a big economy and some kick ass hardware but it would soon find itself struggling to procure the necessary funds in a tanking economy. In the event of war Russia and China would dump their holdings of US debt while the Arabs strangle the oil supply. It would be a painful start to any hypothetical conflict like this that involves these players.

In the end it would come down to WHERE the war is being fought. If it was in Asia then the US would be horribly outnumbered and outgunned. If it was on North American soil, the US would have the odds in its favour and the help of Canada.

In a nuclear war, Russia would win with sheer warhead numbers and land-mass size. Then again, the world would be uninhabitable afterwards.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 25687053
United States
09/10/2013 11:32 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: How long will WW3 last with ONLY conventional weapons? And who wins?
if no nukes are ever used then how long can it last?
usa, uk, europe vs china, russia and arabs.
who do you think will win with only using conventional weapons.hiding
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 33689832


In 1987 the Russians had about 2,500 long-range missiles, ICBM and SLBM and 9,847 warheads. The total has been reduced but they could easily re-arm 2000+ missiles with conventional multi-warhead payloads.

The USA has less than 1/3 of what the Russians have. We wouldn't stand a chance against Russia in a MISSLE to Missile shootout.

Why do ya think Reagan wanted to develop a StarWars Laser system? Its because we are out gunned over 2 to 1.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 27337211

assuming a russian icbm all in strike

So when a couple hundred nuke reactors all go critical meltdown in the western countries. All that radiation shit blows where ?

Tens of thousands of oil wells all spewing oil on land/sea cause there is no way to shut them off. All that stuff goes where ?

Natural gas is toxic , explosive and has no smell in its natural state.
So all that again goes where ?


LOL the russians nuke us and by proxy meltdowns nuke themselves a short while later .

Most of america would be a toxic wasteland afterwards as well.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 34387228
Canada
09/10/2013 09:51 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: How long will WW3 last with ONLY conventional weapons? And who wins?
Why is the west pooh poohing the threat of nuclear war?
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 34387228
Canada
09/11/2013 06:12 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: How long will WW3 last with ONLY conventional weapons? And who wins?
We need peace.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 5373869
Canada
09/11/2013 10:41 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: How long will WW3 last with ONLY conventional weapons? And who wins?
It would probably last 4-6 years.

American air power would last as long as its carriers, which would eventually be sunk by a combination of Silkworm and Iskander missiles (notwithstanding the occasional lucky sub). The US has a big economy and some kick ass hardware but it would soon find itself struggling to procure the necessary funds in a tanking economy. In the event of war Russia and China would dump their holdings of US debt while the Arabs strangle the oil supply. It would be a painful start to any hypothetical conflict like this that involves these players.

In the end it would come down to WHERE the war is being fought. If it was in Asia then the US would be horribly outnumbered and outgunned. If it was on North American soil, the US would have the odds in its favour and the help of Canada.

In a nuclear war, Russia would win with sheer warhead numbers and land-mass size. Then again, the world would be uninhabitable afterwards.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 46488057


And to think that's what we just risked.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 25795452
Canada
09/12/2013 05:01 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: How long will WW3 last with ONLY conventional weapons? And who wins?
Who knew?
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 2226485
United States
09/12/2013 05:20 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: How long will WW3 last with ONLY conventional weapons? And who wins?
It (WW) has been going on since July 28th 1914 so you tell me.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 43559948
United States
09/12/2013 05:24 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: How long will WW3 last with ONLY conventional weapons? And who wins?
potentially forever, and who would win.... almost impossible to predict, urban and jungle warfare in asia and middle east and africa would go on forever. America air power would probably be able to gain air superiority over china to considerably degrade the ability of its ridiculously huge ground army.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1167398
Austria
09/12/2013 05:27 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: How long will WW3 last with ONLY conventional weapons? And who wins?
Thread: ***WW3 PROPHECIES FROM EUROPE*** ISON, THE REAL 2012 AND A NEW AGE (My personal story)
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 46353517
United States
09/12/2013 05:29 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: How long will WW3 last with ONLY conventional weapons? And who wins?
I'm pretty much counting on it. You are talking a bunch of paper champion losers who don't know anything but to do what their handlers tell them. That's why Putin is like the rest of us....wtf I really have to nuke you scumbags? Whatever at this point, the radiation speeds up natural selection. We are definitely at that point where I would know SHTF, before S actually HTF.
Aye-aye

User ID: 46729022
Bulgaria
09/12/2013 05:32 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: How long will WW3 last with ONLY conventional weapons? And who wins?
kimmajortom
Aye-aye
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 46758069
Canada
09/15/2013 01:09 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: How long will WW3 last with ONLY conventional weapons? And who wins?
Degrade? Who the fuck talks that way, Hitler?
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 48262966
Canada
10/12/2013 03:40 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: How long will WW3 last with ONLY conventional weapons? And who wins?
OBAMA SAVED THE WORLD AGAIN.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 48349419
Brazil
10/14/2013 10:49 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: How long will WW3 last with ONLY conventional weapons? And who wins?
The world slept through the blink.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 32069520
United States
10/14/2013 10:51 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: How long will WW3 last with ONLY conventional weapons? And who wins?
if no nukes are ever used then how long can it last?
usa, uk, europe vs china, russia and arabs.
who do you think will win with only using conventional weapons.hiding
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 33689832


In 1987 the Russians had about 2,500 long-range missiles, ICBM and SLBM and 9,847 warheads. The total has been reduced but they could easily re-arm 2000+ missiles with conventional multi-warhead payloads.

The USA has less than 1/3 of what the Russians have. We wouldn't stand a chance against Russia in a MISSLE to Missile shootout.

Why do ya think Reagan wanted to develop a StarWars Laser system? Its because we are out gunned over 2 to 1.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 27337211


We're getting close to having laser weapons...
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 32069520
United States
10/14/2013 10:55 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: How long will WW3 last with ONLY conventional weapons? And who wins?
It would probably last 4-6 years.

American air power would last as long as its carriers, which would eventually be sunk by a combination of Silkworm and Iskander missiles (notwithstanding the occasional lucky sub). The US has a big economy and some kick ass hardware but it would soon find itself struggling to procure the necessary funds in a tanking economy. In the event of war Russia and China would dump their holdings of US debt while the Arabs strangle the oil supply. It would be a painful start to any hypothetical conflict like this that involves these players.

In the end it would come down to WHERE the war is being fought. If it was in Asia then the US would be horribly outnumbered and outgunned. If it was on North American soil, the US would have the odds in its favour and the help of Canada.

In a nuclear war, Russia would win with sheer warhead numbers and land-mass size. Then again, the world would be uninhabitable afterwards.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 46488057


[link to www.spacedaily.com]

Well, US Navy is supposed to have laser weapon ready in 2014... that could be the difference seeing that laser moves at the speed of light and could potentially easily counterattack Silkworm and others.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 39473326
Canada
10/19/2013 03:10 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: How long will WW3 last with ONLY conventional weapons? And who wins?
Hopefully, sanity will be restored.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 47705711
United Kingdom
10/19/2013 03:40 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: How long will WW3 last with ONLY conventional weapons? And who wins?
if no nukes are ever used then how long can it last?
usa, uk, europe vs china, russia and arabs.
who do you think will win with only using conventional weapons.hiding
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 33689832


Given the recent deals inked between the UK and Russia/China are you really counting them on Obamas side?
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 47686690
Argentina
10/19/2013 04:04 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: How long will WW3 last with ONLY conventional weapons? And who wins?
Years?
Who wins? None
With much of the infrastructure damaged, destroyed or inoperative, famine, lack of fuel, and so on.....conventional WW wars (not nuclear) will burn themselves down.
Too big of a planet, for tiny ants (humans)
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 39473326
Canada
10/19/2013 01:19 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: How long will WW3 last with ONLY conventional weapons? And who wins?
ABSOLUTELY, NO WINNERS NOW. WE ARE DESTROYING THE PLANET.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 48701470
Canada
10/21/2013 03:51 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: How long will WW3 last with ONLY conventional weapons? And who wins?
True. Who needs war. Even the Pacific Ocean is now DEAD!
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1018748
United States
10/21/2013 03:56 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: How long will WW3 last with ONLY conventional weapons? And who wins?
First OP, it would not stay conventional for long... it would eventually go nuke once side X started to lose... after the first launch, you have about 20-25 minutes depending on launch origin. After that, 50% out right die, others follow in days/weeks due to illness, disease, etc. Within a few months 98% dead. Those that survive would inherit a world (assuming they did not launch Omega devices) of misery...eventuality is that 100% of life would die... thus proxy wars will only be fought, chances of WWx escalating to the point of no return is too great...
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 48061882
United Kingdom
10/21/2013 03:59 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: How long will WW3 last with ONLY conventional weapons? And who wins?
China by a landslide.

Undetectable subs that just piss about off the coast of LA

Billions of the fuckers for a land invasion.

Job done.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1018748
United States
10/21/2013 04:00 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: How long will WW3 last with ONLY conventional weapons? And who wins?
China by a landslide.

Undetectable subs that just piss about off the coast of LA

Billions of the fuckers for a land invasion.

Job done.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 48061882


Unless they are packed like pickup trucks (like our neighbor to the South - Mexico), I don't think you are getting billions of chinese on subs...





GLP