Dr Judy Wood's 9/11 theory.

we need an honest investigation that we never received.

I've never heard of them, but I have developed theoretical possibilities of blown transformers being exposed to large amounts of water, and electrolyzing into hydrogen... that would be the only other rational theory to explain how the steel beams were cut like that.

The explosion in the basement must have been the large transformer that rectify power.

The only reason they would cover it up is for the same reasons they never exposed us to Nikola Tesla in school. They don't want us to know about water electrolysis.

i love her and john hutchison's work together on 911.
the pictures on her page of the melted cars with tires intact are amazing.

She cant even explain her 'own' work and has ground to a halt ever since her friend changed her mind instantly when offered a wall street job

Haven't read the book, but familiar with her theory. It seems plausible to me. Just the way those "elite" tards think--don't want to damage any valuable surrounding real estate owned by them or their cronies. So they use a method that accomplishes destruction of the towers without collateral damage.

We all saw the "dustification." There isn't any publicly-known technology that can accomplish that.

IMO, several methods were used. Again, that's how they roll. Overkill. If one method fails, you have multiple backups. So you have the main destroyer, a free-energy device, plus nano-thermite and maybe a couple other things too. Accomplishes the objective and creates the desired confusion. Focusing on evidence of the other modalities serves to mask the use of the free-energy device.

I think Judy Wood is right-on. That's why there has been such a huge attempt to discredit her. Richard Gage's group, Architects and Engineers for 911 Truth I used to think was really great - until they started ignoring and then dissing Wood. Also Jim Fetzer - pretends to support her but then slyly tries to discredit her as well. That there is a smoking gun, folks.

This lady has some good points indeed
I remember getting right into Tesla,john Hutchinson, Tom Bearden, Edward grey etc. years ago. As fascinated as i was i didn't put two and two together.

In the past i saw the towers come down i always thought to my self "that's a lot of energy" Explosives seemed the most logical. Even though i worked underground as charge crew (explosives) and i knew there is always remnants of detonators and det cord after.
But then i just thought the towers just de-materialized the evidence. But that's a lot of energy! Underground i have used huge amounts of anfo and powergel and over blasted things to hell. But never turned rock in to mostly dust. It's mostly gravel still. But always evidence of explosives.

I was in an iron, zinc mine and sometimes we have a dusty or secondry explosion of the dust that forms. It burns at thousands of degrees but still there is visible evidence of explosives.

Thermite would of made those towers light up like the sun and blinded everyone

If it was gravity alone?, well i have to sarcastically say they were the worst design and built buildings in the world ever. All three.
If it were gravity that means these building were on the brink of failing anyways. Seeing as though the kinetic energy of the falling top piece of the tower was being converted into angular momentum but on a nano level (dust)I would of thought the fall would of been slowed down by Massive steel beams and concrete turning to dust.
All that material seemed to do is make the collapsing top piece angry as it plunged through to the ground (presumed). Maybe the massive crushing forces involved was enough to induce a low level fusion or fission of some elements in the material? lol
The ground stopped over a million tons of near free falling kinetic energy dead. No structural damage to near by buildings out side of the trade complex. An underwhelming siesmic graph that seems to support the notion that not much of these buildings hit the ground

Whatever Tesla stumbled across way back then, it doesn't seem to be as crazy as they made him out to be.
i stole this from someone elses thread

[link to www.drjudywood.com]

just a radio interview with her. Suits my low bandwidth
I found plenty of vids on the tube as well

oops
i meant copper and zinc mine.

Great info and analyis.

JW's work is consistent with a "5d" approach. O's razor suggest that this is true.

The source of this is the key - and many will be surprised to find that this source is obvious, yet (still) unseen.

Great info and analyis.

JW's work is consistent with a "5d" approach. O's razor suggest that this is true.

The source of this is the key - and many will be surprised to find that this source is obvious, yet (still) unseen.


Thanks
Tesla struck me as someone that had the keys to ... something
and that coral castle guy.
Fascinating stuff

Dr Woods book is based on the facts and evidence available to her at the scene of 9/11 and therefore her comments are not based on theory. If you do have her book and have heard her speak she clearly states that she does not have any theories about 9/11. Dr Woods discusses the available and visable evidence of the events that took place that day and nothing more.

Another thing i am always fascinated with is the idea of an electric universe. Particularly electric magnetic dust storms
when i was i child of about 12 years . i was picked up by a willie willie or dust storm in the bush.
It gently picked me up and placed me about 20 mtres away. I did not feel the wind on my skin nor did i feel my own weight or momentum.
If i talk to any one about this which i do not. they will all say it is impossible and i imagined it. Maybe?

here are some short vids. that i don't know how to embed. Also i can't check because my internet is to slow :)
I am moran

[link to www.youtube.com]

[link to www.youtube.com]

[link to www.youtube.com]

[link to www.youtube.com]

thermite was INSIDE the box beams placed there through inspection ports.
These are what held up the structures and thermite running down them after burning through the ends at each connection is why it ended up in the basements.
Thermite on the outside would run off no matter how much, but contained inside the beams even in smallish amounts it is unstoppable and need not even be seen or heard but would weaken the supporting beams from the top down as it ran down the inside of the contained box beams to the bottom levels.

There is only one remotely possible way that flowing or pooled molten metal can be explained either in the basement levels or in vids of it pouring out the side, and that is the 4000 degree molten iron that thermite generates instantly upon being ignited.
There is no other explanation, no normal ie non-pressurize oxygen source can melt anything yellow hot. As a welder and metal caster this should be obvious.

I doubt that thermite adequately accounts for molten steel WEEKS after the 9-11 event. Thermite, as indicated in samples from the dust, seems to have played a role. But something additionally had to be going on to melt steel and keep it melted for that period of time.

that ain't no rational theory

For a long time I thought it was controlled demolition... until Dr. Judy Wood raised the questions. She's correct in asking, 'Where did the towers go?' I have her book, it's a must read.

I just watched the new movie 'The Anatomy of a Great Deception', it just re-states the theory of demolition. Demolition may have been included, but I think there is evidence of a greater power we don't know about. As she describes it, 'Evidence of directed free-energy technology'. Follow the evidence. And follow the money.

1913-1921 28th President of the United States Dr. Thomas Woodrow Wilson

“Some of the biggest men in the United States, in the field of commerce and manufacture, are afraid of somebody, are afraid of something. They know that there is a power somewhere so organized, so subtle, so watchful, so interlocked, so complete, so pervasive that they had better not speak above their breath when they speak in condemnation of it.”

Sometimes our Presidents try to warn us.

I have her book too, and it fucks me off how she wont be drawn on who,why,what,where,how etc. same old line since 2009 etc.

I hadn't paid attention to her work but I heard her on Noory the other night and she is very disjointed

She believes in the energy weapon but cannot elaborate on its origination, its manufacture or any details.

Her insistence upon referring to the jumpers as 'people who left the building early' (I may not have that exactly correct) is really bizarre.

After hearing her I immediately went to Judy Wood debunked.

From what I can tell she uses selective photos, data and info to produce her theories.

Her reasoning as to why it couldn't have been a controlled detonation was that when you drive past blasting sites they have signs that say no radio or cell phone use. Which obviously only applies to radio controlled detonation.

She does not come off as someone who is credible or sane

Here is my answer about Judy Wood the complete moran:



What a moran!

Could it have been a small, underground nuke like the Russians have been saying? I dunno

They were NUKED. What else turns granite into LAVA?? VT has covered this exhaustively with data dumps by Russian intel and nuclear "fingerprints" verified by U.S. scientists from Sandia labs.

Nukes, not DEW, ETs, nano-thermite. NUKES! Read the articles and look at the pictures.

I initially bought into controlled demolition, but after reading Dr. Woods thoughts, and the fact that rubble pile of both towers is way too small. Just using each buildings 47 core columns, there was close to 24 miles in just the columns. There was obviously not 24 miles of twisted columns seen in any photos of ground zero, let alone thousands of tons of concrete and outer steel. Also, where is any photo proof of the massive amounts of duct work, wiring, plumbing, etc, that should have been very visible in the rubble.

Those half melted cars and trucks that were around a mile away from the towers are also a good indication that some type of advanced weaponry was used on 9/11. There is a photo showing the top 20-30 floors of one of the towers begin to topple off to the side, and then just disappears in a cloud of dust. This large portion of the building is clearly seen falling and should have continued down in a large chunk, but it simply turned to dust.

It's amazing how so many people never really looked at all of this evidence right in front of them. I always like to discuss this with construction worker friends and ask them these questions above, and typically I hear, "yeah, that is weird".....