|
REPORT ABUSIVE REPLY
|
|
Message Subject
|
Big earthquake on October 17th? This asteroid has a history
|
|
Poster Handle
|
Anonymous Coward |
|
Post Content
|
...The asteroid as I already stated passed just hours after it was discovered on the 27th september, not the 30th which was when most news agencies reported it so that quake is irrelevant. If you are so sure that the theory hold some credibility then why do you come here of all places to try and prove yourself? it is because there is always that part of the lunatic fringe that will believe you. Have you tried to get your theory published or at least looked at by a geologist? I just did a bit of research after typing that and came across a very telling article written by a geologist who states that anyone with this theory is nothing more than a fraud and lo and behold YOU were quoted in that article. [ link to www.wired.com] Would you like to lay on the table your calculations and findings of ALL quakes you think are caused by fly bys and why quakes that were not caused by fly bys happened? Quoting: Anonymous Coward 48458098 I have nothing to prove. I try to stick to the facts, see where the chips fall, hit or miss. You can research my past GLP posts and predictions, with full details and results of each. I think I have the best record on GLP. Happy to get press in Wired :) Of course I have never solicited or accepted donations. I looked again and see that the flyby was indeed September 27th at 22:50 UT [ link to www.astronomerstelegram.org] BTW... A magnitude 6.8 earthquake struck Pakistan, on September 28 Now you are making no sense at all. You state that you believe asteroids cause quakes because of the electric universe, a charge between earth, the sun and the asteroid. Electricity travels at 300.000 kms, so why would it take 9 hours for the asteroid to cause a quake in pakistan? Facts? i see none, I think Erik Klemetti was spot on with that article. You bring the theory to the table and say you have nothing to prove? oh but you do, the onus is on you to provide proof to your outrageous claims. I am not looking through the mountain of threads to find your work, you should have it at hand all calculated out ready to back up your claims. Lucky guess on the date, I bet you have had windows before now. This is getting old. I have made no claims. I answered questions folks ask with my opinions and impressions and state as so. I can't answer questions about "cause" because I can only guess. Facts I focus on are referenced to data and reports from NASA, JPL, USGS, etc. If that data is enough for me to announce a quake watch window I do. During this window I expect to see an event, not that the event will definitely occur. For most it is fun to watch. For others they look to debunk and argue. There is nothing to debunk. I am not here to prove a theory, just demonstrate it in action, live, in real time, for anyone to see. I am happy to answer questions for anyone really looking for an answer. This has been my first post and prediction in about 6 months when I let my GLP subscription lapse. For your benefit I researched the last "scoreboard" I could find. From here you can research the related threads: UPDATE/SCOREBOARD:
Mar 20 is next target date (currently 7 NEOs)
Mar 06 was target date - Miss
Feb 20 could be a target if more NEOs found by then
Feb 15 was target date - Hit on Feb 16
Feb 15 was target date - Hit on Feb 14
Feb 06 was target date - Hit on Feb 06
Jan 30 was target date - Hit on Jan 30
Jan 25 was target date - Miss
Jan 11 was target date - Miss
Jan 05 was target date - Hit on Jan 05 (post)
Dec 21 was target date - Hit on Dec 21
Dec 18 was target date - Hit on Dec 17 - but Miss as only 6.1
Dec 08 was target date - Hit on Dec 07
Nov 30 was target date - Miss - one hour after window!
Nov 04 was target date - Miss
Oct 28 was target date - Hit on Oct 28
Oct 17 was target date - Hit on Oct 16
Oct 11 was target date - Hit on Oct 12
Oct 11 was target date - Hit on Oct 10
Oct 03 was target date - Miss but had the 4.1 in Calif Oct 2 and had a 4 quake swarm Oct 04-05 on Northern Mid-Atlantic Ridge (Mag 5.5, 4.8, 5.5, 5.7)
Sep 26 was target date - Hit on Sep 26
Sep 26 was target date - Hit on Sep 25
Sep 17 was target date - Miss
Sep 14 was target date - Hit on Sep 14
Sep 07 was target date - Hit on Sep 07
Sep 02 was target date - Hit on Sep 03
Aug 26 was target date - Hit on Aug 26
Aug 18 was target date - Hit on Aug 18
Aug 08 was target date - Hit on Aug 08
Aug 06 was target date - Hit on Aug 06
Jul 21 was target date - Hit on Jul 20
Jul 12 was target date - Miss
Jul 05 was target date - Hit on Jul 06
Jun 29 was target date - Hit on Jun 29
Quoting: TheTruthWorker Most of those you call hits are dates after the date you predicted, if it down to electric as you say then there is no way that will happen, electricity travels too fast for a window (which i guessed right that you used windows before). You also failed to mention the misses in this thread including 8 neo's that produced nothing Next target date is May 5th
:20130414n:
Quoting: TheTruthWorker That shows your theory is nothing more than a stab in the dark, 8 neo's would have produced at least one large quake considering you got ""hits"" on less neo's. I also had a quick look and noticed that when you tried to predict quakes in a 24 hour window |EVERYONE failed. This is nonesense.
|
|
|
Please verify you're human:
|
|
|
Reason for reporting:
|
