I just proved the Moon landing hoax bring it on SHILLS !!!

The dark empire is far from crumbling, it's just starting to show its true face becausepeople never praised truth more than their pride. Americans were and are still proud about the moon landings, isn't it? It would be to hard to admit they have been fooled for a long time.

threat
noun \thret\

: a statement saying you will be harmed if you do not do what someone wants you to do

: someone or something that could cause trouble, harm, etc.

: the possibility that something bad or harmful could happen
Full Definition of THREAT
1
: an expression of intention to inflict evil, injury, or damage
2
: one that threatens
3
: an indication of something impending <the sky held a threat of rain>
See threat defined for English-language learners »
See threat defined for kids »
Examples of THREAT

He was willing to use violence and threats to get what he wanted.
She ignored their threats and continued to do what she felt was right.
a country under threat of civil war

Origin of THREAT
Middle English thret coercion, threat, from Old English thr&#275;at coercion; akin to Middle High German dr&#333;z annoyance, Latin trudere to push, thrust
First Known Use: before 12th century

Last Edited by Shadowy_Planet on 10/11/2013 05:54 PM

Dominoes are black for a reason. When they start failing, it is a spectacle. The hoax is not confined to the moon missions, but is the matrix itself.

funny, though, how the "identical" images in your 11 second video are different images...

I'm not a child you fucking idiot.

Look at the Ladder footage from the simulation it is the same as the supposed live event.. it's over the hoax is exposed.

Are you blind? Same footage. I can prove it with a motion track program. Its over the hoax is exposed.

Now lets get to the moon and beat China

so these are different events?

the images are not identical. it' only takes eyes to tell that.

Be clearer.

All we can see is you pointing at clips containing the same video and claiming they contain...the same video.

If you have a specific clip in which you can show what is clearly the Apollo EVA video, in which it was identified as something else, then you need to clearly point that moment out.

Be clearer.. So you are saying the lunar landing footage is not from the moon?

The simulation, states simulation

The 'real' one broadcast to the world

Same footage of the ladder scene.

This is impossible.. How could CBS have footage of the ladder scene with different dialogue, this means they got it before it happened.

Watch it again. The ladder scene is the same in the simulation !
If it switched over to a 'live' feed - then how!? This was a script read through with different dialogue to the one used in the one broadcast.

It's over this footage exposes it.

Be clearer.. So you are saying the lunar landing footage is not from the moon?

The simulation, states simulation

The 'real' one broadcast to the world

Same footage of the ladder scene.

This is impossible.. How could CBS have footage of the ladder scene with different dialogue, this means they got it before it happened.

Watch it again. The ladder scene is the same in the simulation !
If it switched over to a 'live' feed - then how!? This was a script read through with different dialogue to the one used in the one broadcast.

It's over this footage exposes it.

Search for yourself ! The broadcast moon landing footage..
Then compare to the CBS simulation - the simulation obviously happened before the event because the dialogue is different, yet it has the same ladder decent scene!

Proving finally they at least faked the footage..

Again, NASA currently a bunch of empty fucking offices because those shit flinging monkeys in Washington can't even operate a fucking government, are able to control all space faring nations on the planet Earth, and fake highly sophisticated output from modern Indian and Chinese satellites that have orbited the Moon and have proof of the landing sites.

Fucking using Russia, India or China to sort your debt and energy problems for decades, the only use NASAs control of these governments is to fake satellite imagery

It's done, over.

The truth will set you free

This is clearer?

I'd hate to see you at obfuscation!

What do you mean by "dialog?" The broadcaster commentary?

The audio isn't lined up on the isolated clip, by the way. There is at least one edit in it.

NASA in the Sixties decided to fake developing India into a modern industrial, nuclear and economic powerhouse over 50 years, fake an Indian Space program, fake an Indian satellite launch, fake its trip to the moon, fake the satellites orbit around the Moon, fake all of the output from its radar and cameras to show Apollo landing sites for one reason only, because geniuses on the internet had spotted a few glitches in some 50 year old TV footage, and were about to crack their "faked" moon landings wide open.

YUP. THAT MAKES SENSE.

What is amazing (or is it sad?) is that you either don't realize (or are deliberately lying) that the CBS footage STARTS with a simulation but then turns to the live footage of Armstrong when he was stepping out. That part is NOT a simulation. It looks like the same footage because it IS the same footage. It was the footage being broadcast live. Quit lying.

Prove it. If you need moisture then why can one make a clear print in DRY Portland cement?

I'm reminded of a bit -- I think it is "Duck Soup" -- where Groucho Marx tells Chico's character that he looks just like...Chico's character in the same movie.

To which the unflappable Chico laughs. "He think I look alike!"

Here are some things suggesting that the Soviets also faked their moon missions.

The Lunokhod program was hastily developed and managed to land and operate two remotely-controlled rovers on the lunar surface (in 1970 and 1973), scoring another Soviet first. After the US successes, the support for a Moon landing mission evaporated and the Russian space program focused on orbital stations.
[link to rationalwiki.org]

The Luna 21 spacecraft landed on the Moon and deployed the second Soviet lunar rover (Lunokhod 2) in January 1973.
As of June 26, 2013, its journey remained the longest any robotic rover, or any vehicle, that had ever driven on another celestial body.
The rover stood 135 cm (4 ft 5 in) high and had a mass of 840 kg (1,850 lb).
The lander and rover together massed 1814 kg.
Launcked by a Proton K rocket.
[link to en.wikipedia.org]

Proton K rocket had countless launch failures. TEN OF THEM WERE INTENDED TO REACH THE MOON, see link bellow..
Length 21.2 metres (70 ft) Diameter 7.4 metres (24 ft) Empty mass 31,100 kilograms (68,600 lb) Gross mass 450,510 kilograms
[link to en.wikipedia.org]

Lunar lander
Lunar Roving Vehicle 463 pounds (210 kg)

Rocket Saturn V
Height 363.0 feet (110.6 m) Diameter 33.0 feet (10.1 m) Mass 6,200,000 pounds (2,800,000 kg)
[link to en.wikipedia.org]

Now who's going to tell me how Soviets using a five times smaller rocket, that had 10 failures to reach the moon, delivered a 840 kg rover to the moon in a hastily made mission, while Americans using a 5-6 times larger rocket delivered a 210 kg rover to the moon.

the americans can't handle the truth.

Lunar regolith is not "dust".

It has rather unique mechanical properties.
It is a known and demonstrated fact that it is quite well possible to leave imprints on materials with those properties.


Because, unlike you, they are actually informed about Apollo.
Prolly better informed than anyone outside NASA.


The Saturn V delivered a complete Lunar Module to the surface of the Moon.
Six and a half tonnes of it.

It also brought along a manned spacecraft with enough fuel to return to Earth.




Why would anyone give Bart the Stalker the light of day?
That video only proves that none of the Apollo astronauts liked Bart the Stalker.

"Knowing you, Mr. Sibrel, that's probably a fake Bible." -- Neil Armstrong

_____________________________________________________________​___________________
I will give a hundred bucks (EUR100,-) to the first person who can prove a single relevant evidential fact ever claimed by any hoaxmonger.
The Halcyon Dayz EVIDENCE or STFU! Challenge.

Proof means it has to pass scientific muster, relevant means it must actually be evidence for hoaxing and nothing else.
Any suggestions on how to organise this are welcome.

If someone will send me the plans and specs for the
equipment, I'll prove they couldn't have gone to the
moon and come back on the power they had.

Based on weight of power source vs use and length of
use.

Not the power of the fuel. The electrical power to
support life, keep lights on etc.

Why are hoaxies always so lazy?

I disbelieve.

If you had the ability to understand the equipment and parameters, you'd have the ability to find the information. There is no lack of documents on the Apollo spacecraft.

That is idiotic, the CBS one is a practice run with entirely different audio.
What's sad is that shills still can say something so utterly ridiculous in the face of irrefutable evidence and people on here will be stupid enough to believe it!

The simulation is not what was broadcast on the night of the 'real' event.
So how does something with different audio which was a script run through contain a scene that hadn't had not happened yet?

So you are saying the simulation was a simulation up until the ladder decent scene? But there is entirely different scripted dialogue, which proves the ladder decent was a per-recorded scene.

I think you are confused? I would get NASA to remove that CBS simulation ASAP. If you look at Walter Kroncite's commentary of the supposed 'real' landing and ladder decent.. The commentary is entirely different .. Same live event with different audio, but both with Walter in means..

Walter had a twin brother.. Or Walter had pre-recorded commentary, predicting what the moon landing would look like .

The CBS simulation is not supposed to be int public domain, someone cocked up ! Or are trying to blow the whistle.

There is no way to argue our if this one..

Idiot...

you know that will never happen.
there's too much at stake for usa.

yes you are.