Snow that does not melt when you put fire to it...

Seeking a scientific rational explanation for this. (rain, not snow)

Why do people think the moment you put fire to snow or ice it will melt? I live in the snow belt and I can tell you when my car is covered in snow and I start the defroster after my car has warmed it takes a long time to melt its not instant at all. They get a little snow in the south and suddenly its a conspiracy of epic proportions. Its obvious the worldwide weather is changing, but its not the nwo dropping fake snow on everyone. People need to calm down and just get their snow shovels out.

Around here they call it ice pellets. .

A few points:

There are many different kinds of snow depending on conditions. The snow in the video is very dense corn or granular snow. Snow handled or brought into a warm enviroment will transform into corn snow before it melts. This snow is caused by partial melting and refreezing and is very resistant to melting. Snowbanks created by plows have been known to last well into the winter months in northern states

It takes over 100 calories to heat 1 gram of ice from 32 to 33 degrees This is called heat of fusion. It only takes 1 calorie to heat water from 33 to 34 degrees. There is nothing unusual about the way the snow is melting in the video. The blackness is soot. Snow does not burn. When it melts the water doesn't drip off because it is absorbed into the mass of snow. It takes quite a bit of melt before it will become saturated and start to drip off.

edit content' bolded

I just ate some snow and swallowed a lit candle at the same time and shit pure water everywhere

Hey all you snowtards and melt tards. Do this experiment.

1. Get some snow and let it melt naturally into water
2. Use that same melted snow which has become water and put it in an ice tray and freeze it.

3. Take one ice cube and put a ligter to it. Now do you see water dripping.

snowtards

I was/am tired. The water wasn't falling on the burner Slick. Didn't watch it huh? It truely is priceless when a debunk video debunks itself.

I just tried this and I can confirm: it doesn't melt and parts of it turn black

Ice Pellets? This is the powdered residue that remained after everything was dry and warm. It had to be hosed off.

Is that what Ice Pellets do? Does this happen often where you are? Large, wet, raindrops leave a powder, and you call this phenomenon Ice Pellets?

Also - I put on gloves, scraped some of the powder off with a razor blade, and placed it in a sealed jar where it remains. Do Ice Pellets always leave this residue? Please explain.

Okay so from some of the comments I read, snow does not melt when you put fire to it? What we are being shown in these video's is accurate and snow will not melt when you put fire on it?

Not fake snow, enhanced snow, that has different properties due to chems.

nah, I call that a geo engineering fuckup. But thats not what this thread is about . A didn't watch your vid, I assumed you were bleating about the snow that wouldn't melt as well. If you collect and analyze any sample of precipitation you will find all kinds of crap in it.Some of it is pollution, some is natural, and some is geo engineering and god knows what else

BTW every single snowflake has a particle of something at the center called a condensation nuclei. When I was a kid we warned not to eat snow because of the nearby aluminum plant. If there were not particulate matter in the atmosphere snowflakes could not form. It isn't a big leap of logic to conclude different nuclei result in different types of snow. Needle or 'shard' snow is not at all uncommon

YAY! Somebody that has actually seen different types of snow before!

Seriously, the snow is full of air pockets that can absorb the melted water and the cold temperature of the snow causes it to refreeze. That's one of the reasons you can't eat snow straight for hydration, it is full of more air than water.

Also wtf is everybody using a bic lighter for? Much less smothering the flame against the snow and holding it sideways. Try to flick a bic a few millimeters from your hand and see how it ignites, after a few tries right? The lighter fuel can't ignite and hold enough heat if there's no airflow and oxygen to allow it to transition into a gaseous state. The hottest part is right at the tip of the flame when it's held straight up (the bright white-orange). That's where you get the best mix of heat, fuel and oxygen.

The other dude uses a blowtorch, but that shit is so hot and high pressure that the jet of heat basically vaporizes the water before it escapes the jet and has time to condensate. You can see it behind the ice cube (which has more water/volume aka density btw)in that dark patch. That dark spot is all the vaporized water being sprayed onto the plate by the pressure of the blowtorch.

The ice cubes melt because they're basically solid water on the surface. They're waaaaaay denser than snow so they produce more water in a less amount of time.

Trust me on this. I'm studying wildland fire and firefighting right now. We talk all about fuel moisture content, fire behavior, weather and similar shit ALL THE TIME!

Get off the damn illuminati/chemtrail/them-against-us train for once and do some observation and experimentation. There is a sheeple group forming as a result of questioning things but getting the wrong answers.

I am doing all sorts of tests on the snow here and pictures will be included. Thanks for the suggestion, but what is a ligter?
The snow here is flammable so letting it melt might not tell the whole story, but I couldn't hurt.
I will update with everything I can find out myself and again after I get this stuff sent out for other testing.
The tests I've done so far are weight,density, ph,ammonia,and nitrate NO2 and NO3.
I will be putting some stains & slides together hopefully later today.

The iron, copper, lead, bacteria, pesticides, chlorine, cyanuric acid,yeast and calcium tests from my yard and from a few sites around my county.
I'll try to put some more work in on these later but sleep deprivation is kicking my ass and I'm really slowing down.

I'm open to suggestions on any other test people can think of.

One thing I have to add that I found suspicious. The black sooty looking remnant on that German guys snow.

I'm not denying variance in the snow composition. It could very well be affected by geoengineering. After all, we do have stuff like acid rain and cloud seeding that produce unnatural precip. from injection of materials.

But snow not melting? C'mon

the black soot is the carbon from the combusted lighter fluid.

the reason snow does not melt is because of the air pockets in between the snowflakes, the snow crystals are 'airy', just like the pink fiberglass insulation in your house.

that is why an igloo made of snow will keep you warm and not melt on the inside, snow has an R value equal to or better than the pink insulation in your house because of it's crystalline, open structure.

Why did it turn black?

Interesting all around information.

This video is fake. Look carefully before she opens the door to go outside, she has something white in the same hand she is holding the lighter.



Last Edited by Ozone Baby on 01/30/2014 01:16 PM

This is what the snow looks like once it has been allowed to melt down at room temperature. All utensils used were freshly cleaned. The water was run through a colander to remove debris, then it was run through a Brita filter. Within a cpl days this happened. It smells like model cement, and has a snotty consistency


IMAGE ( [link to s1.postimg.org] )

Like i said, put it in a pot and melt it.

:thefacepalm11:

+1