ww3 will never be allowed

Granted, ruining what you want to acquire is not to bright.

Many of us know this to be true, but you OP should explain why since you posted this






Last Edited by SW Fla Pirate on 03/16/2014 06:57 PM

Never underestimate the stupidity of politicians.

Don't forget, they get to survive.
To do it all over again.
They have their bunkers already prepped.

We are the ones who are fucked.

OP is correct.

[link to www.foxnews.com]

Captain Robert Salas was on duty in Montana in 1967 when a UFO shut down the nuclear missiles on his base. And he's hardly the only one to make such a claim.

On Monday, six former U.S. Air Force officers and one former enlisted man will break their silence about similar events at the National Press Club, all centering around unidentified flying objects and nuclear missiles. They plan to urge the government to publicly confirm the incidents, stating that they were ordered never to discuss the events.

"We're talking about unidentified flying objects, as simple as that," Salas told FoxNews.com. "They're often known as UFOs, you could call them that," he added. Salas, a former U.S. Air Force nuclear missile launch officer, will host the event along with researcher Robert Hastings, author of "UFOs and Nukes: Extraordinary Encounters at Nuclear Weapons Sites.

According to the pair, witness testimony from more than 120 former or retired military personnel points to an ongoing and alarming intervention by unidentified aerial objects at nuclear weapons sites, as recently as 2003. In some cases, several nuclear missiles simultaneously and inexplicably malfunctioned while a disc-shaped object silently hovered nearby.

"I was on duty when an object came over and hovered directly over the site," Salas said, regarding the March 16, 1967, event at Malmstrom AFB in Montana. "The missiles shut down, 10 Minuteman missiles. And the same thing happened at another site a week later," he said.

Correctamundo





.

Correct because nuclear missiles have been made for ???

my question is why did 'they' allow hiroshima and nagasaki?

it ended the war

They were traveling here they had a flat on the way !

WW III will be short and will be nuclear. WW IV will follow shortly after, be longer and non nuclear.

I would hope nuclear weapons will never be used again. I do believe though some rouge nation or terrorist group will use one. It is just a matter of when and where. I don't think those who have nuclear capability now are crazy enough to use it.

Japan tried to surrender in late 1944 but the US declined.

The weapons were to scare the Soviets, not to end the war. MacArthur wanted to invade the main island regardless of casualties.

I recently noted the above commentary regarding UFO interference with ICBM sites at Malmstrom AFB in March 1967, and decided to correct a few misconceptions that the authors of the associated bits – in tandem with Robert Salas and Robert Hastings – seem to be so obsessed with. This apparently stems, for the most part, from their refusal to accept the claims of the only two people who were actually present at Echo Flight: Eric D. Carlson, the commander of Echo Flight, and Walt Figel, his deputy commander. Both men have repeatedly asserted that UFOs were not involved with those events in 1967. You are welcome to believe whatever you like, but Robert Salas, author of "Faded Giant", and Robert Hastings, author of "UFOs and Nukes" have been repeatedly accused of lying about and/or embellishing details of these incidents by those military veterans who served their nation well during the hottest period of the Vietnam War and the coldest stretch of the Cold War. The fact that there is not even one single condition of evidence to prove the claims these men have addressed is a point that very few of you have shown any willingness to consider.

If you wish to know exactly what happened in 1967, and why the missiles at Echo Flight actually failed, and why the Oscar Flight claims are so pointlessly irresponsible, I encourage you to examine (without any cost, a deal Hastings and Salas have been unwilling to match) the following narratives:

[link to www.scribd.com]

[link to www.scribd.com] [this one is an examination of the issues for those unfamiliar with the case]

[link to www.realityuncovered.net]

[link to www.realityuncovered.net]

[link to www.realityuncovered.net]

I would also recommend that you examine the numerous interviews and articles at the Reality Uncovered website: [link to www.realityuncovered.net] Many of the articles discuss the events at Echo Flight and Oscar Flight in March 1967, and include interviews with both the commander and the deputy commander at Echo Flight on March 16, 1967. To this day, Robert Salas insists that both men confirm his claims of UFO interference, which both men deny strongly. Robert Hastings refuses entirely to discuss these matters in detail or to answer any questions regarding the testimonies of these two men, preferring instead to attack the integrity and credibility of those publically raising such issues. He refuses to offer anything substantial in the way of evidence, and fails entirely to explain the details of his claims or to answer any of the valid questions raised by his insistence. What he has done is rely on the craven use of blatant lies and baseless insults in regard to his critics without once managing to refute or even discuss their criticisms. Even worse, he has neglected to defend his own theories against numerous accusations of massive fraud and profiteering on a scale UFO proponent communities have only rarely been subjected to.

A lot information regarding these alleged "UFO" incidents can be found at the Reality Uncovered forum, in particular the Echo Flight Incident thread at [link to www.realityuncovered.net] Every single detail, digression, discussion or subject of argument asserted by both of these dishonest and irresponsible men has been explained and discussed in great detail in the documents and on the websites you've been directed to. Not one question has been left unanswered, a statement that neither Hastings nor Salas can honestly affirm. Both men, in fact, are proven liars who have created fiction and called it fact, something anyone willing to actually do the research can determine very readily for himself, as the events they've wrapped their pathetic clams around – contrary to their prior assertions – have been completely declassified since before 1980.

They tried to end the war under terms more favorable to themselves than could possibly be justified to the American public -- that is NOT a surrender. A surrender is what happened after we blew up two of their cities, and we were able to accept that surrender without another 300,000 Americans dying in a protracted invasion effort of Japan. History can be pretty interesting if you take the time to learn it...