Is this the real reason why flight 370 disappeared? | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 56211662 United States 03/30/2014 09:32 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | The guy in OP's video, Ambellas, is not even listed on this patent as an inventor or assignee. The video is Bullshit. You moran hes the guy who found the evidence he was not on the patent..... you are right about that but if you click my earlier link it shows the ownership of the patent and the inventors assigned it to their employer two month's before the patent was filed. Which is typical when working for a company. The inventors would be listed as an assignee if they had any ownership of the patent. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 48923552 United Kingdom 03/30/2014 09:33 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 56177550 United States 03/30/2014 09:33 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 25159219 United States 03/30/2014 09:37 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Éireann User ID: 56239180 United States 03/30/2014 09:37 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Holy! Freaking! Shit! I can not believe I didn't make the connection with 9/11, the Bin Ladens, the Bush's, and the Carlyle Group. No wonder I was thinking that the most plausible explanation for the missing plane was the PressTV's assertion that it was disappeared in order to use it (actually a supposed copy of the plane stored somewhere in Tel Aviv) as a FF attack to bring about world support for an attack on Iran. Well damn. Thanks for the vid, OP. How about that! FreeScale was the property of Carlyle all this time and they now get 100% of the profits for those patents! These people will stop at nothing and spare NO one to get what they want. Unbelievable! Eireann~ I am crucified with Christ: nevertheless I live; yet not I, but Christ liveth in me: and the life which I now live in the flesh I live by the faith of the Son of God, who loved me, and gave himself for me. - Galatians 2:20 |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 56244827 United States 03/30/2014 09:38 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
abhie User ID: 56253975 India 03/30/2014 09:38 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | This theory has been floating around for a week and more now. Summary; 4 of the engineers onboard mh 370 owned 20% of shares each of Freescale semi conductors. Once dead the ownership goes full to the Carlyle group. Nothing new in the video. (I'm male, mid-40's, and live and work in India as a designer. Writing is a passion of mine, as is painting. My avatar represents my protagonist against the Illuminati -a female warrior.) :laotszungb: |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 48095265 United States 03/30/2014 09:38 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Éireann User ID: 56239180 United States 03/30/2014 09:40 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | But how can the four employees simultaneously be patent holders with their employer? Quoting: Anonymous Coward 56177550 Some companies don't demand that all physical and intellectual property created while under employment contract become the sole property of the company. Little companies, like FreeScale Semiconductor, would be better served by encouraging employee/employer partnerships in discovery patents. Eireann~ I am crucified with Christ: nevertheless I live; yet not I, but Christ liveth in me: and the life which I now live in the flesh I live by the faith of the Son of God, who loved me, and gave himself for me. - Galatians 2:20 |
TTX8K82 User ID: 43682209 United States 03/30/2014 09:41 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Travis Bickle Vigilantes need love too.... User ID: 26788702 United States 03/30/2014 09:41 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 56244441 United States 03/30/2014 09:42 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 55698711 Singapore 03/30/2014 09:42 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | can you put this "reason in question" into one sentence? its hard to answer if yes or no. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 53848324 Did the carlye group arange to have the plane disappear to increase their share of the semiconductor patent ownership from 20% to 100%? The patent is titled "method to determine the number of dies to use on a semi-conductor wafer" if the patent is upheld, and is what i think it is, it would be worth about a trillion dollars over the next 20 years or so. This would be like owning the patent on the cardboard box nearly everything in the world gets shipped in. Normally, these MIC people can print as much money as they want. but ownership of the patent is worth more than money. it is worth an unreal amount of power. They could shut down semiconductor plants all over the world if they felt their patent was infringed. if a government does not shut down a plant based on a claim from this patent, they could be considered in breach of treaty, so the MIC gets rich mitigating these situations, whether with bombs or lawyers. So having the inventors have control of the patent would limit the ability of the carlye group to use it in the way they wanted. if the patent rights are distributed to the families of the victims, they will not protest any decision and use the revenue as a multi-generational meal ticket. Jut like the carlye group is doing, except the carlye group did not invent it, and they will make a million times more money and power than the families. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 56244441 United States 03/30/2014 09:44 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | But how can the four employees simultaneously be patent holders with their employer? Quoting: Anonymous Coward 56177550 Some companies don't demand that all physical and intellectual property created while under employment contract become the sole property of the company. Little companies, like FreeScale Semiconductor, would be better served by encouraging employee/employer partnerships in discovery patents. Yes, and the claims, or errors in claims of the vid render it as rubbish......not a bad vid, but incomplete or slightly infactual....And that is all it takes..... something smelly going on.. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 56211662 United States 03/30/2014 09:45 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | But how can the four employees simultaneously be patent holders with their employer? Quoting: Anonymous Coward 56177550 Some companies don't demand that all physical and intellectual property created while under employment contract become the sole property of the company. Little companies, like FreeScale Semiconductor, would be better served by encouraging employee/employer partnerships in discovery patents. They would be listed as the assignee of the patent but they are not. It's very rare for an American company to even give a 3% royalty to a person they employ. If you look at this link it shows the employee's assigned the patent to their company in 2012, two month's before the patent was filed. [link to assignments.uspto.gov] |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 25159219 United States 03/30/2014 09:46 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 56244441 United States 03/30/2014 09:50 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | But how can the four employees simultaneously be patent holders with their employer? Quoting: Anonymous Coward 56177550 Some companies don't demand that all physical and intellectual property created while under employment contract become the sole property of the company. Little companies, like FreeScale Semiconductor, would be better served by encouraging employee/employer partnerships in discovery patents. Yes, and the claims, or errors in claims of the vid render it as rubbish......not a bad vid, but incomplete or slightly infactual....And that is all it takes..... something smelly going on.. I as a contract worker am immune to having my intellectual property automatically belonging to my employer...of course, like Eireann says, it all depends... |
Floki User ID: 9643019 Australia 03/30/2014 09:51 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 56211662 United States 03/30/2014 09:51 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Éireann User ID: 56239180 United States 03/30/2014 09:51 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | But how can the four employees simultaneously be patent holders with their employer? Quoting: Anonymous Coward 56177550 Some companies don't demand that all physical and intellectual property created while under employment contract become the sole property of the company. Little companies, like FreeScale Semiconductor, would be better served by encouraging employee/employer partnerships in discovery patents. They would be listed as the assignee of the patent but they are not. It's very rare for an American company to even give a 3% royalty to a person they employ. If you look at this link it shows the employee's assigned the patent to their company in 2012, two month's before the patent was filed. [link to assignments.uspto.gov] Huh. Thanks for the link. Now I'm not sure what the hell is going on. But that Carlyle has it's claws in Freescale doesn't set well with me either. Eireann~ I am crucified with Christ: nevertheless I live; yet not I, but Christ liveth in me: and the life which I now live in the flesh I live by the faith of the Son of God, who loved me, and gave himself for me. - Galatians 2:20 |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 56211662 United States 03/30/2014 09:53 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | But how can the four employees simultaneously be patent holders with their employer? Quoting: Anonymous Coward 56177550 Some companies don't demand that all physical and intellectual property created while under employment contract become the sole property of the company. Little companies, like FreeScale Semiconductor, would be better served by encouraging employee/employer partnerships in discovery patents. Yes, and the claims, or errors in claims of the vid render it as rubbish......not a bad vid, but incomplete or slightly infactual....And that is all it takes..... something smelly going on.. I as a contract worker am immune to having my intellectual property automatically belonging to my employer...of course, like Eireann says, it all depends... Would you assign your patent to your employer 2 month's before filing the patent? |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 56244441 United States 03/30/2014 09:58 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Éireann Some companies don't demand that all physical and intellectual property created while under employment contract become the sole property of the company. Little companies, like FreeScale Semiconductor, would be better served by encouraging employee/employer partnerships in discovery patents. Yes, and the claims, or errors in claims of the vid render it as rubbish......not a bad vid, but incomplete or slightly infactual....And that is all it takes..... something smelly going on.. I as a contract worker am immune to having my intellectual property automatically belonging to my employer...of course, like Eireann says, it all depends... Would you assign your patent to your employer 2 month's before filing the patent? Please elaborate... |
Geaux User ID: 986107 United States 03/30/2014 10:02 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 52410732 United States 03/30/2014 10:05 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 56211662 United States 03/30/2014 10:06 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 56244441 Yes, and the claims, or errors in claims of the vid render it as rubbish......not a bad vid, but incomplete or slightly infactual....And that is all it takes..... something smelly going on.. I as a contract worker am immune to having my intellectual property automatically belonging to my employer...of course, like Eireann says, it all depends... Would you assign your patent to your employer 2 month's before filing the patent? Please elaborate... That's what they did [link to campaign.soylent.me (secure)] |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 56211662 United States 03/30/2014 10:07 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 56244441 I as a contract worker am immune to having my intellectual property automatically belonging to my employer...of course, like Eireann says, it all depends... Would you assign your patent to your employer 2 month's before filing the patent? Please elaborate... That's what they did [link to campaign.soylent.me (secure)] Sorry wrong link. Look at my post near the top of the page it is there to the USPTO |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 54402047 United States 03/30/2014 10:08 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
stillhere User ID: 29204297 United States 03/30/2014 10:09 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Too Dark Park User ID: 53498617 United States 03/30/2014 10:12 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Rickster58 User ID: 55541560 Australia 03/30/2014 10:15 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | You know, with the ever-changing story from the Malaysian Government regarding the fate of MH-370, along with their recent statement about "sealed evidence" that cannot be released, the version of events seems plausible, even possible. The 2nd vid CatSscratchfever put up from Anonymous highlights the direct links to Jacob Rothschild. |