Cloward-Piven Strategy, Learn it, Know it, Because You're Living IT!!! | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 57454458 United States 06/24/2014 06:47 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 19876247 United States 06/24/2014 06:48 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | 1. what is that $$$$$$$ that sarah palin INCREASED, for all adult residents of alaska ????? Quoting: Anonymous Coward 59114262 that $$$$$$$ they get for free, every year, just for being there ??? 2. Capitalism is just about DEAD. WHY PAY top dollar for proructs. when you can PRINT THEM OUT, YOURSELF, for PENNIES ??? the newest generation of HOME USE printers will be about 250 $$$. EVER SEE A LAUNDRAMAT ??? a building full of machines, and noboby ever buys them. they are not for sale. they pay to use them, and go home. THAT is the future of 'stores'. a building full of high teck printers, (for things their basic home unit, cannot handle) and noboby ever buys them. they pay to use them, and go home. The check Alaskans get is a protion from their OIL revenues. The Norwegians also return OIL profits. Some people think that natural resources are PUBLIC and should show that to those that live where they will have the impact of extraction. |
Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 35410860 United States 06/24/2014 06:51 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I'm a woman and I'm very outspoken against the radical feminist movement because...feminism stems from Marxism and the end game won't be in women's favor. Quoting: Melrox smart, smart, smart girl. I got suspicious many years back. No feminist of note led anywhere near a normal life. Bravo I am a woman as well and I have yet to meet a feminist who is not a socialist!! Very narrow minded view of the world. One of their defining moments was their lack of support for Monica Lewinsky in the wake of her affair with Clinton. If they were really for women's rights and best interests they would have called Clinton out for his abuse of power with a subordinate woman....which is really just the tip of that iceberg!! They did nothing & even helped drag her through the mud along with the media. There are many more women on this site than is known. I believe many, like myself have a male mind and see through the holes of this anti-family feminism. Colleges brainwash women that they don't need men or children to be happy, and some don't. Government teaches that to the children of welfare. ALL an attempt to slow population growth - as is the gay movement. ALL social engineering to pacify the masses that they don't WANT a home life - they want to work for THINGS and be good consumers and producers of anything but children. They looked at me like I had two heads when I was in the MBA program and visibly pregnant. In the eighties that was not accepted - you had to choose one or the other - children or "serious" career. I was asked why I was taking the spot of a woman serious about contributing to the working world, since I was only one of about four women accepted - out of 200 students. I answered -because I CAN. Most of what you listed is all part demoralizing. Their goal of feminizing or equalizing genders reaches far deeper. Females tend to avoid conflict. Marxists desire this emasculation that's why and how Marxism and Feminism go hand in hand. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 59569017 Canada 06/24/2014 06:53 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 42656405 Well, I hate to burst your bubble ,,, but, the idea of a basic annual income has some support from the right wing as well. [link to en.wikipedia.org] Recently voted in to Switzerland. They got tired of the homeless and youth beggars. Um NO, Swiss did NOT vote in worlds highest minimum wage. Nice try at sharing your own ignorance. Excuse me, I stand corrected. It was widely reported that it would pass - not the minimum WAGE - the subsistence INCOME. [link to news.msn.com] [link to www.nytimes.com] [link to rt.com] You cant just apologize for promoting a lie, you still need to justify yourself and with Marxist/Putin media sources to boot... |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1044117 United States 06/24/2014 07:10 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | The new world devised by Maurice Strong and George Soros The only change that has happened since 1992 is that Strong and Soros now have their Agent of Change coming to the White House. In other words, the world according to Maurice Strong, is unfolding as it should. In an era ridden by bankruptcies and job loss, Zombie-like cultists will swarm Washington, D.C. for the January 20, 2009 inauguration of Barack Obama. [link to canadafreepress.com] ~~~~~ From the not-so-way-back machine, an article from 2008. If you have never heard of Maurice Strong, you are in for quite the treat. A wielder of the Cloward-Piven wand, and among the most dangerous. |
Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 35410860 United States 06/24/2014 07:12 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | The new world devised by Maurice Strong and George Soros Quoting: RantProne The only change that has happened since 1992 is that Strong and Soros now have their Agent of Change coming to the White House. In other words, the world according to Maurice Strong, is unfolding as it should. In an era ridden by bankruptcies and job loss, Zombie-like cultists will swarm Washington, D.C. for the January 20, 2009 inauguration of Barack Obama. [link to canadafreepress.com] ~~~~~ From the not-so-way-back machine, an article from 2008. If you have never heard of Maurice Strong, you are in for quite the treat. A wielder of the Cloward-Piven wand, and among the most dangerous. It's been awhile, but yes very familiar with him and Gaia. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1044117 United States 06/24/2014 07:17 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | The new world devised by Maurice Strong and George Soros Quoting: RantProne The only change that has happened since 1992 is that Strong and Soros now have their Agent of Change coming to the White House. In other words, the world according to Maurice Strong, is unfolding as it should. In an era ridden by bankruptcies and job loss, Zombie-like cultists will swarm Washington, D.C. for the January 20, 2009 inauguration of Barack Obama. [link to canadafreepress.com] ~~~~~ From the not-so-way-back machine, an article from 2008. If you have never heard of Maurice Strong, you are in for quite the treat. A wielder of the Cloward-Piven wand, and among the most dangerous. It's been awhile, but yes very familiar with him and Gaia. He is not very well known, and I thought that rather odd. In America, you'll get mostly blank stares. Even today! Great choice of topic, Melrox. |
RTS REDUX User ID: 57849075 United States 06/24/2014 07:42 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | America’s Criminals In Office Hold Hands And Sing…Literally Read more at [link to patdollard.com] the song is "We shall Overcome" Last Edited by RTS REDUX on 06/24/2014 08:01 PM |
ComeGetSome User ID: 26578122 United States 06/24/2014 07:45 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | The Cloward–Piven strategy is a political strategy outlined in 1966 by American sociologists and political activists Richard Cloward and Frances Fox Piven that called for overloading the U.S. public welfare system in order to precipitate a crisis that would lead to a replacement of the welfare system with a national system of "a guaranteed annual income and thus an end to poverty". Cloward and Piven were a married couple who were both professors at the Columbia University School of Social Work. Quoting: Melrox Obama-Columbia Hillary-Columbia [link to en.wikipedia.org] Yet, no one to my knowledge has connected all the dots between Barack Obama and the Radical Left. When seen together, the influences on Obama’s life comprise a who’s who of the radical leftist movement, and it becomes painfully apparent that not only is Obama a willing participant in that movement, he has spent most of his adult life deeply immersed in it. [link to www.teapartyconnect.com] |
RTS REDUX User ID: 57849075 United States 06/24/2014 07:58 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Agenda 21 (The forth Reich) is Nazism, not Marxism or communism which is why not a single politician or talking head on the right has mentioned Soros's involvement in the coup d'état in Ukraine. The US and NATO have been trying really hard to provoke Russia into fighting WW3 which would give them the perfect excuse to crack down on any and all dissent under the guise of 'national security' George Soros emphasized the necessity of a large-scale technical and financial assistance program for Ukraine. Quoting: ... "Ukraine is a potentially attractive investment destinantion. ... The new regime in Ukraine is eager to confront that task," Soros said. ... Earlier George Soros called for an EU Marshall Plan for Ukraine. He mentioned that "Europe, true to form, demanded a lot and offered little... It's very important to respond, and to respond in the right way... Something like a European Marshall plan for Ukraine." ... Some experts allege that geopolitics is not Soros' area of [sic] expertise as a finance trader. This hardly holds as international finance requires profound knmowledge and understanding of international politics and geopolitics. That is why successful international financiers are usually well versed in many areas related to international finance. The opinion of George Soros about a Marshall Plan for Ukraine is very appropriate and timely from the geopolitical and international finance points of view. ... On April 6, 2014, George Soros somewhat unexpectedly visited Ukraine and held a number of meetings. [link to www.freerepublic.com] The U.S. has Installed a Neo-Nazi Government in Ukraine Confirmed by Assistant Secretary of State Victoria Nuland, key organizations in the Ukraine including the Neo-Nazi party Svoboda were generously supported by Washington: “We have invested more than 5 billion dollars to help Ukraine to achieve these and other goals. … We will continue to promote Ukraine to the future it deserves.” The Western media has casually avoided to analyze the composition and ideological underpinnings of the government coalition. The word “Neo-Nazi” is a taboo. It has been excluded from the dictionary of mainstream media commentary. It will not appear in the pages of the New York Times, the Washington Post or The Independent. Journalists have been instructed not to use the term “Neo-Nazi” to designate Svoboda and the Right Sector. [link to www.freerepublic.com] Last Edited by RTS REDUX on 06/24/2014 08:04 PM |
Seed Saver User ID: 32417637 United States 06/24/2014 08:32 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
s. d. butler User ID: 974819 United States 06/24/2014 08:53 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | America’s Criminals In Office Hold Hands And Sing…Literally Quoting: RTS REDUX Read more at [link to patdollard.com] the song is "We shall Overcome" Gag. well they are America's only distinctly criminal class. |
RTS REDUX User ID: 57849075 United States 06/24/2014 09:58 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Agenda 21 (The forth Reich) is Nazism, not Marxism or communism which is why not a single politician or talking head on the right has mentioned Soros's involvement in the coup d'état in Ukraine. Quoting: RTS REDUX The US and NATO have been trying really hard to provoke Russia into fighting WW3 which would give them the perfect excuse to crack down on any and all dissent under the guise of 'national security' Gleb Bazov ‏@gbazov 6m Quoting: Anti-Banderist #IMPORTANT - Warning of an imminent #FALSEFLAG by #Ukraine in #Novorossiya - PLZ RT WIDELY [link to rense.com] … Expand |
RTS REDUX User ID: 57849075 United States 06/24/2014 10:24 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Agenda 21 (The forth Reich) is Nazism, not Marxism or communism which is why not a single politician or talking head on the right has mentioned Soros's involvement in the coup d'état in Ukraine. Quoting: RTS REDUX The US and NATO have been trying really hard to provoke Russia into fighting WW3 which would give them the perfect excuse to crack down on any and all dissent under the guise of 'national security' Gleb Bazov ‏@gbazov 6m Quoting: Anti-Banderist #IMPORTANT - Warning of an imminent #FALSEFLAG by #Ukraine in #Novorossiya - PLZ RT WIDELY [link to rense.com] … Expand [link to www.youtube.com (secure)] |
BattlesightZero User ID: 57378126 United States 06/24/2014 10:32 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 42656405 Well, I hate to burst your bubble ,,, but, the idea of a basic annual income has some support from the right wing as well. [link to en.wikipedia.org] Recently voted in to Switzerland. They got tired of the homeless and youth beggars. Um NO, Swiss did NOT vote in worlds highest minimum wage. Nice try at sharing your own ignorance. Excuse me, I stand corrected. It was widely reported that it would pass - not the minimum WAGE - the subsistence INCOME. [link to news.msn.com] [link to www.nytimes.com] [link to rt.com] "Subsistence Income" is an oxymoron. Real, actual subsistence is an agrarian condition, such as existed before "civilization", when you had to be completely self-sufficient (that is, work to fulfill your own every need), and trade was limited to barter with neighbors. No money in that equation at all; certainly no "income". And by the way, "subsistence" is nowhere a guarantee. Stating that someone "subsists" means that they succeed in keeping themselves alive under adverse conditions... and carrying the clear connotation that not all people successfully do so under those conditions. Yeah, that's right - under real "subsistence" conditions, the unsuccessful people die. "Subsistence income" is the misappropriate language used by libtards to imply a right to a monetary subsidy sufficient to *guarantee* a persons survival, but this concept does not align with the actual meaning of "subsistence" in any linguistic axis at all. So I finish where I began - "Subsistence Income" is a total oxymoron, you moran. Photo of Animal Cracker #~6247 "I deserve a living wage. Yeah, really, I do." BattlesightZero YOU, and only YOU are responsible for maintaining the balance of power between you and the rest of the semi-sentient beings in this world. You cannot disclaim or delegate that responsibility; it is a function of being a living, breathing "adult" in this world. If you can't manage yourself on those terms, someone else *will* manage you on their terms. Your terms are irrelevant. Buy a rifle; prepare to defend yourself. If you don't, what happens is *your* fault. Period. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 56975212 United States 06/24/2014 10:47 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | This movie connects the dots for you: [link to vimeo.com] |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 59569017 Canada 06/24/2014 10:52 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: beeches smart, smart, smart girl. I got suspicious many years back. No feminist of note led anywhere near a normal life. Bravo I am a woman as well and I have yet to meet a feminist who is not a socialist!! Very narrow minded view of the world. One of their defining moments was their lack of support for Monica Lewinsky in the wake of her affair with Clinton. If they were really for women's rights and best interests they would have called Clinton out for his abuse of power with a subordinate woman....which is really just the tip of that iceberg!! They did nothing & even helped drag her through the mud along with the media. There are many more women on this site than is known. I believe many, like myself have a male mind and see through the holes of this anti-family feminism. Colleges brainwash women that they don't need men or children to be happy, and some don't. Government teaches that to the children of welfare. ALL an attempt to slow population growth - as is the gay movement. ALL social engineering to pacify the masses that they don't WANT a home life - they want to work for THINGS and be good consumers and producers of anything but children. They looked at me like I had two heads when I was in the MBA program and visibly pregnant. In the eighties that was not accepted - you had to choose one or the other - children or "serious" career. I was asked why I was taking the spot of a woman serious about contributing to the working world, since I was only one of about four women accepted - out of 200 students. I answered -because I CAN. Most of what you listed is all part demoralizing. Their goal of feminizing or equalizing genders reaches far deeper. Females tend to avoid conflict. Marxists desire this emasculation that's why and how Marxism and Feminism go hand in hand. DAY-AM boy! I think you just about got it. Now you only have to identify the 'their' in real life with reasonable certainty. There's no point in designation of a threat group without being able to identify the members of it before they act. Until you've repelled a threat you haven't done anything of significance. |
Anonymous Cowherder Stop the inanity! User ID: 48661115 United States 06/25/2014 05:42 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | bookmarked Repeal the 17th Amendment and the Reapportionment Act of 1929! Thread: First steps down the road to a return to the Constitutional Republic that we were intended to be. Restore the Republic. Thread: The Bill of Rights does NOT include age requirements! It's a flower, not something to be feared. - Moo! |
Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 35410860 United States 06/25/2014 08:34 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | If you like to read, this is a good one. This was written back in 1999... 'Cultural Marxism' and 'critical theory' are concepts developed by a group of German intellectuals, who, in 1923 in Germany, founded the Institute of Social Research at Frankfurt University. The Institute, modeled after the Marx-Engels Institute in Moscow, became known as the Frankfurt School [3]. In 1933, when the Nazis came to power in Germany, the members of the Frankfurt School fled to the United States. While here, they migrated to major U.S. universities (Columbia, Princeton, Brandeis, and California at Berkeley). These intellectual Marxists included Herbert Marcuse, who coined the phrase, 'make love, not war,' during the anti-Vietnam War demonstrations. [link to www.freerepublic.com] |
Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 35410860 United States 06/25/2014 09:01 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 58449258 Bravo I am a woman as well and I have yet to meet a feminist who is not a socialist!! Very narrow minded view of the world. One of their defining moments was their lack of support for Monica Lewinsky in the wake of her affair with Clinton. If they were really for women's rights and best interests they would have called Clinton out for his abuse of power with a subordinate woman....which is really just the tip of that iceberg!! They did nothing & even helped drag her through the mud along with the media. There are many more women on this site than is known. I believe many, like myself have a male mind and see through the holes of this anti-family feminism. Colleges brainwash women that they don't need men or children to be happy, and some don't. Government teaches that to the children of welfare. ALL an attempt to slow population growth - as is the gay movement. ALL social engineering to pacify the masses that they don't WANT a home life - they want to work for THINGS and be good consumers and producers of anything but children. They looked at me like I had two heads when I was in the MBA program and visibly pregnant. In the eighties that was not accepted - you had to choose one or the other - children or "serious" career. I was asked why I was taking the spot of a woman serious about contributing to the working world, since I was only one of about four women accepted - out of 200 students. I answered -because I CAN. Most of what you listed is all part demoralizing. Their goal of feminizing or equalizing genders reaches far deeper. Females tend to avoid conflict. Marxists desire this emasculation that's why and how Marxism and Feminism go hand in hand. DAY-AM boy! I think you just about got it. Now you only have to identify the 'their' in real life with reasonable certainty. There's no point in designation of a threat group without being able to identify the members of it before they act. Until you've repelled a threat you haven't done anything of significance. It's already in action and has been for a very long time. The Marxists NEED to emasculate in order to complete their goal. Hence, the gay agenda and the propping of those who "come out". The gays are to be praised, I'd even go as far to say, held as an example to others. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 59629663 United States 06/25/2014 10:21 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Hint, hint. Though the economic system might seem complicated, it functions in a plain, automated way. It's constructed of a few elementary components and a lot of uncomplicated transactions that are done repeatedly countless of times. These transaction agreements are predominantly compelled by human disposition, and they constitute three central forces that fuel the economy: 1. Productivity growth, 2. The Short term debt cycle, and 3. The Long term debt cycle. [link to topdocumentaryfilms.com] |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 59569017 Canada 06/25/2014 10:37 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | If you like to read, this is a good one. Quoting: Melrox This was written back in 1999... 'Cultural Marxism' and 'critical theory' are concepts developed by a group of German intellectuals, who, in 1923 in Germany, founded the Institute of Social Research at Frankfurt University. The Institute, modeled after the Marx-Engels Institute in Moscow, became known as the Frankfurt School [3]. In 1933, when the Nazis came to power in Germany, the members of the Frankfurt School fled to the United States. While here, they migrated to major U.S. universities (Columbia, Princeton, Brandeis, and California at Berkeley). These intellectual Marxists included Herbert Marcuse, who coined the phrase, 'make love, not war,' during the anti-Vietnam War demonstrations. [link to www.freerepublic.com] Curiously Marcus and his ilk would rather make war, not love on the gentiles and their nations. Internationalists need to open the gates and tear down the walls that would serve as natural barriers to their attempts and stealth invasion and control. What better way than to corrupt and pervert those charge with manning the borders with self indulgent sex, drugs and rock and role while the internationalists crawl over what was designed and built keep their poison outside. Liberalism has one major enemy Christianity, so ever effort is made to control it, marginalize it, pervert it and thusy destroy it. The self sufficiency, responsibiliy and meritocracy that is th very basis of Christian principles made them wealthy and a threat to those who presume themselves entitled by heredity and too privileged to provide for themselves honestly. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 59569017 Canada 06/25/2014 10:39 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Capitalism can't exist without it's foundation of credit and debt. Quoting: SuzHannah Hint, hint. Though the economic system might seem complicated, it functions in a plain, automated way. It's constructed of a few elementary components and a lot of uncomplicated transactions that are done repeatedly countless of times. These transaction agreements are predominantly compelled by human disposition, and they constitute three central forces that fuel the economy: 1. Productivity growth, 2. The Short term debt cycle, and 3. The Long term debt cycle. [link to topdocumentaryfilms.com] Bullshit and proof that you know nothing about capitalism. |
Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 35410860 United States 06/25/2014 10:43 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Socialist Revolutionary Matriarchy "Matriarchy: The First and Final Communism." Cue Hillary Clinton for President? A revolutionary matriarchy, I argue, asserts the following three principles: 1. THE ABOLITION OF GENDER AS A CONSTRUCTION OF POWER DISPARITY AND DIFFERNTIAL, AS WELL AS THE ELIMINATION OF ANY SOCIAL MEANING (eg., "masculine," "feminine," etc.). With this principle is the elimination of hetero-normative patriarchy with its requisite and hegemonic condition of binary gender identity, replaced by a completely fluid and liberatory conception of personal identity, to which sexual preference and expression has no normative-enforced dominance. Gender becomes meaningless and irrelevant, and certainly has no assignment, much less inference of, social power differential or normative social meaning. Bathroom and toilet facilities would be gender-less. Individual-created clothing styles would replace the highly gender-ized dominance of the fashion industry. A far more expressive range of notions about beauty and personal freedom of sexual expression would be great encouraged. It goes on and on...Sound familiar? It's happening... [link to static.squarespace.com] |
Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 35410860 United States 06/25/2014 10:49 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Seed Saver User ID: 32417637 United States 06/25/2014 12:02 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | It seems like we almost there already. When they no longer need the docile sheeple to mindlssly follow their agenda, they will set us at each other to reduce the "surplus" population. ISIS, by the way, is a curious name for an Islamist group. [link to www.stopthecrime.net] |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 55510809 United States 06/25/2014 04:38 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I see people on here, of all places, asking how the minorities have so much say. Answer "Marxism". They use the "oppressed" , and when one group of the "oppressed" have been used up, they move onto the next group...when they run out of groups...then what? Quoting: Melrox The answer is very simple. Those who declare themselves a permanent entitled minority need to claim some method by which they end up on top despite their lack of numbers and their location outside of their own borders. Being a minority at war with a majority they must use other minorities to do their warfare for them in order to limit their own expense in lives or resources. Sounds like a quote used by the extremely rich, the 1% to insure further tax breaks, use of $ to buy votes, favorable rulings by SC, ie: corporations are persons, etc. Also makes it sound like people getting benefits are at war with the upper classes. I am one of those people. I am on disability for mental illness. I worked for 20 years before having to use benefits I accrued. The people I know in the same situation are like me struggling to get by. We wish we had more but by no means are aiming to topple society or those in higher income levels. Having said that, plans to improve the lot of the poor and low class historically go nowhere. Why? No money in it for those with money. Go back to Watergate. Deepthroat said it best: "Follow the Money!" |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 60115844 United States 07/10/2014 08:39 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |